Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-pk75h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-20T18:05:22.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Guido Vanden Wyngaerd*
Affiliation:
Catholic University, Brussels
*
Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk, Onderzoek-Vlaanderen, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel, Vrijheidslaan 17, B-1081 Brussels, Belgium [guido.vandenwyngaerd@kubrussel.ac.be]

Abstract

The telic-atelic distinction has been argued to hinge on the presence of a (bounded) internal argument measuring out the event, or, alternatively, a resultative small clause providing an end point for the event. Both perspectives are partially correct and partially incorrect. On the one hand, the resultative is more adequately seen as a measure than an end point; on the other, it is the resultative predicate rather than the internal argument that performs this measuring function. Empirical evidence is adduced in support of this point of view: resultative predicates are subject to the requirement that they denote a bounded scale. Only bounded predicates can delimit an event by providing it with minimal parts. As a matter of conceptual necessity, unbounded predicates, though potentially denoting end points, cannot function as event measures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abusch, Dorit. 1986. Verbs of change, causation and time. Stanford, CA: CSLI, MS.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1981. On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. Radical pragmatics, ed. by Cole, Peter, 6381. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The syntax of interpretation. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, and Rooryck, Johan. 1998. On the interpretation of there in existentials. Proceedings of WCCFL XVII.Google Scholar
Bauer, Gero. 1970. The English ‘perfect’ reconsidered. Journal of Linguistics 6. 189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Michael. 1981. Of tense and aspect: one analysis. In Tedeschi & Zaenen, 1329.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert. 1991. Time and the verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bunt, Harry. 1985. Mass terms and model theoretic semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. Milan: University of Milan, MS.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1981. On the definition of the telic-atelic (bounded-nonbounded) distinction. In Tedeschi & Zaenen, 7990.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1979. Aspect and the bounded/unbounded (telic/atelic) distinction. Linguistics 17. 761–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse. 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and selection. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garey, Howard. 1957. Verbal aspect in French. Language 33. 91110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher; and Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. To appear in The Proceedings of SALT 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 547–93.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1998. Negatief-polair moeten [negatively polar moeten ‘must‘]. Tabu 27. 95112.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74. 101–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1991. Small clauses everywhere. Leiden: Leiden University, MS.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1992. Aspect and theta theory. Thematic structure: Its role in grammar, ed. by Roca, I.M., 145–74. Berlin: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1996. Parallels between nominal and verbal projections. Leiden: University of Leiden, MS.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1999. Auxiliary selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun, and Mulder, René. 1990. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. Linguistic Review 7. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 305–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. Twistin' the night away. Language 73. 534–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1999. Prepositional complementizers as attractors. Probus 11. 3973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Klein, Henny. 1997. Adverbs of degree in Dutch. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1988. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. Genericity in natural language, ed. by Krifka, Manfred, 247–84. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1989. Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 559605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1991. Structures for semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3. 129.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, Alexander. 1981. Events, processes and states. In Tedeschi & Zaenen, 191212.Google Scholar
Mulder, René, and Wehrmann, Pim. 1989. Locational verbs as unaccusatives. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1989, ed. by Bennis, Hans and Kemenade, Ans van, 111–21. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1992. Secondary resultative predicates in Italian. Journal of Linguistics 28. 5390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenfelt, Lennart. 1977. Events, actions, and ordinary language. Lund: Bokförlaget Doxa.Google Scholar
Postma, Gertjan. 1995. Zero semantics. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Potts, Timothy. 1965. States, performances, activities. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 39. 6584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sybesma, Rint, and Wyngaerd, Guido Vanden. 1997. Realizing end points: The syntax and semantics of Dutch ge and Mandarin le. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, ed. by Coerts, Jane and Hoop, Helen de, 207–18. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. The relation of grammar to cognition. Topics in cognitive linguistics, ed. by Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida, 165205. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, Philip, and Zaenen, Annie (eds.) 1981. Tense and aspect. New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tortora, Christina. 1998. Verbs of inherently directed motion are compatible with resultative phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 338–45.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk. 1972. On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar