Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-gsx72 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2026-02-23T07:41:36.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On comparative concepts and descriptive categories: A reply to Haspelmath

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Frederick J. Newmeyer
Frederick J. Newmeyer*
Affiliation:
University of Washington, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University
*
1068 Seymour St. Vancouver, BC V6B 3M6 Canada, [fjn@u.washington.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Language , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 688 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. (Studies in generative grammar 9.) Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W., and Wilkins, Wendy. 1984. Locality in linguistic theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion ‘thematic role’. Properties, types, and meaning, vol. 2: Semantic issues, ed. by Plank, Frans, 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Order of adjective and noun. The world atlas of language structures, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard, 354–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. Grammatical relations in Ktunaxa (Kutenai): The Belcourt lecture delivered before the University of Manitoba on 24 February 1995. Winnipeg: Voices of Rupert's Land.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? Essays on language function and language type, dedicated to T Givón, ed. by Bybee, Joan, Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A., 115–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Helen, and Johnson, Donald C. (eds.) 2003. Wedding dress across cultures. Oxford: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4. 333–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language 15. 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1973. Linguistics as a pilot science. Themes in linguistics: The 1970s, ed. by Hamp, Eric, 45–60. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86. 663–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, image and signal: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine, Sir Henry. 1872. Village communities in the East and West. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Moyse, Claire. 2004. Recherches en linguistique océanienne. Paris: Université Paris IV halibitation.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Theoretical implications of grammatical category–grammatical relation mismatches. Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar, ed. by Francis, Elaine and Michaelis, Laura A., 149–78. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2007. Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology 11. 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel, and Sadler, Louisa. 2004. Nominal tense in crosslinguistic perspective. Language 80. 776–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel, and Sadler, Louisa. 2008. When is a temporal marker not a tense? Reply to Tonhauser 2007. Language 84. 325–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1995. Thematic relations and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 635–62.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1975. Clausematiness. Formal semantics of natural language, ed. by Keenan, Edward L., 422–75. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2007. Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaraní nominal temporal markers. Language 83. 831–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2008. Defining crosslinguistic categories: The case of nominal tense. Language 84. 332–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Baer, Conrad J. 1998. The applicability of comparative concepts. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 2.2.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., , and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar