Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-m4fzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-01T02:06:53.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On statistical measures and ancient writing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Rajesh P. N. Rao ,
Rob Lee ,
Nisha Yadav ,
Mayank Vahia ,
Philip Jonathan  and
Pauline Ziman
Rajesh P. N. Rao*
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle
Rob Lee*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Nisha Yadav*
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Mayank Vahia*
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Philip Jonathan*
Affiliation:
University of Lancaster
Pauline Ziman*
Affiliation:
PHS Consulting Ltd.
*
Rao, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA98195 [rao@cs.washington.edu]
Lee, School of Biosciences, Geoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, United Kingdom [R.Lee@exeter.ac.uk]
Yadav and Vahia, Department of Astronomy &Astrophysics, TIFR, Mumbai 400005, India
Yadav and Vahia, Department of Astronomy &Astrophysics, TIFR, Mumbai 400005, India
Jonathan, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YF, United Kingdom
Ziman, PHS Consulting Ltd., Pryors Hayes Farm, Willington Road Oscroft, Tarvin, Chester CH3 8NL, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

An article published in Language (Sproat 2014a) questions our findings on the Indus script and Pictish symbols published in the journals Science (Rao et al. 2009a), PNAS (Rao et al. 2009b), IEEE Computer (Rao 2010), and the Proceedings of the Royal Society (Lee et al. 2010a,b). Sproat's article does not accurately present our methods and findings, and its conclusions are based on what appears to be a misunderstanding of our proposed approach. For example, the article's results on entropic measures seem to favor, rather than contradict, the inductive hypothesis that the Indus script may represent writing. The article selects results to draw a particular set of conclusions and convey a specific viewpoint. In light of these issues, we stand by our original findings.

Information

Type
Replies
Information
Language , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. e198 - e205
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, John Romilly, and Anderson, Joseph. 1993 [1903]. The early Christian monuments of Scotland. 2 vols. Balgavies: Pinkfoot.Google Scholar
Cessford, Craig. 1996. Colouring the stones. Pictish Arts Society Journal 9. 6–8.Google Scholar
Ebeling, Werner. 1993. Entropy, predictability and historicity of nonlinear processes. Statistical physics and thermodynamics of nonlinear nonequilibrium systems, ed. by Ebeling, Werner and Muschik, Wolfgang, 217–28. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Steve. 2005. Simple proof against the ‘Indus script’. Palo Alto, CA, ms. Online: http://www.safarmer.com/indus/simpleproof.html. Accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard; and Witzel, Michael. 2004. The collapse of the Indusscript thesis: The myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 11. 2. 19–57. Online: http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvsn02/ejvsn02article.pdf.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. R. 1934. The script of Harappa and Mohenjodaro and its connection with other scripts. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kenoyer, J. Mark. 2004. Quoted in Lawler, p. 2026.Google Scholar
Lawler, Andrew. 2004. The Indus script: Write or wrong? Science 306. 2026–29. DOI: 10.1126/science.306.5704.2026.10.1126/science.306.5704.2026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Rob, Jonathan, Philip; and Ziman, Pauline. 2010a. Pictish symbols revealed as a written language through application of Shannon entropy. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences 466. 2545–60. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2010.0041.Google Scholar
Lee, Rob, Jonathan, Philip; and Ziman, Pauline. 2010b. A response to Richard Sproat on random systems, writing, and entropy. Computational Linguistics 36. 791–94. DOI: 10.1162/coli_c_00029.10.1162/coli_c_00029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, Iravatham. 1977. The Indus script: Texts, concordance and tables. Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, Iravatham. 2009. The Indus ‘non-script’ is anon-issue. The Hindu, May 3. Online: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-sundaymagazine/the-indus-nonscript-is-a-nonissue/article661496.ece.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Jane R. 2008. The ancient Indus valley: New perspectives. Santa Barbara: ABC CLIO.Google Scholar
Parpóla, Asko. 1994. Deciphering the Indus script. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parpóla, Asko. 2005. Study of the Indus script. Proceedings of the International Conference of Eastern Studies 50. 28–66.Google Scholar
Possehl, Gregory. 1996. The Indus age: The writing system. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Possehl, Gregory. 2004. Quoted in Lawler, p. 2028.Google Scholar
Rao, Rajesh. 2010. Probabilistic analysis of an ancient undeciphered script. IEEE Computer 43. 3. 76–80. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2010.112.10.1109/MC.2010.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Rajesh, Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Joglekar, Hrishikesh, Adhikari, R.; and Mahadevan, Iravatham. 2009a. Entropic evidence for linguistic structure in the Indus script. Science 324.1165. DOI: 10.1126/science.1170391.10.1126/science.1170391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Rajesh, Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Joglekar, Hrishikesh, Adhikari, R.; and Mahadevan, Iravatham. 2009b. A Markov model of the Indus script. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106. 13685–90. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906237106.10.1073/pnas.0906237106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Rajesh, Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Joglekar, Hrishikesh, Adhikari, R.; and Mahadevan, Iravatham. 2010. Entropy, the Indus script, and language: A reply to R. Sproat. Computational Linguistics 36. 795–805. DOI: 10.1162/coli_c_00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Armin O., and Herzel, Hanspeter. 1997. Estimating the entropy of DNA sequences. Journal of Theoretical Biology 188. 369–77. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sproat, Richard. 2014a. A statistical comparison of written language and nonlinguistic symbol systems. Language 90.2.457–81. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0031.10.1353/lan.2014.0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, Richard. 2014b. A statistical comparison of written language and nonlinguistic symbol systems: Online supplementary materials. Language 90.2.s1–s27. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0042.10.1353/lan.2014.0042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, Rosemarie. 1989. A unifying concept for the amino acid code. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 51. 417–32. DOI: 10.1007/BF02460068.Google Scholar
Vidale, Massimo. 2007. The collapse melts down: A reply to Farmer, Sproat and Witzel. East and West 57. 333–66.Google Scholar
Wells, Bryan K. 2011. Epigraphic approaches to Indus writing. Oxford: Oxbow Books. See also http://indusresearch.wikidot.com/script, accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Yadav, Nisha, Joglekar, Hrishikesh, Rao, Rajesh, Vahia, Mayank, Adhikari, R.; and Mahadevan, Iravatham. 2010. Statistical analysis of the Indus script using n-grams. PLoS One 5. 3.e9506. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, Nisha, and Vahia, Mayank. 2011. Indus script: A study of its sign design. Scripta 3. 133–72.Google Scholar
Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Mahadevan, Iravatham; and Joglekar, Hrishikesh. 2008a. Segmentation of Indus texts. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 37. 1. 53–72.Google Scholar
Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Mahadevan, Iravatham; and Joglekar, Hrishikesh. 2008b. A statistical approach for pattern search in Indus writing. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 37. 1. 39–52.Google Scholar