Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-z5ksc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-15T10:30:44.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peculiar Passives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Alice Davison
Alice Davison*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Passive sentences often have different meanings and communicative intent from the corresponding active sentences. It is proposed that the ‘extra’ attitudinal and modal meanings of passive sentences are derived by Gricean conversational implicature. It is therefore possible to state the relation between active and passive sentences in syntactic terms without reference to meaning. Implicatures are more likely to be associated with passive sentences if the construction is ‘marked’, as measured by the restrictions placed on which NP's may be promoted to subject position, and what other roles the derived subject may have. Conversationally conveyed meanings are based on what appears as topic in subject position.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 42 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aaltio, Maija-Hellikki. 1963. Finnish for foreigners. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian, and Heny, Frank. 1975. Introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1974. Syntactic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1965. Gujerati reference grammar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George. 1976. Subject in Sanskrit. The notion of subject in South Asian languages, ed. by Verma, Manindra (South Asian studies, 2), 1–38. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Chandola, Anoop. 1966. A syntactic sketch of Garhwali. University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory, MS. [Published by Plenum Press, New York, 1975.].Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1977. In defense of spontaneous demotion: the impersonal passive. Syntax and semantics, 8: Grammatical relations, ed. by Cole, Peter & Sadock, Jerrold, 47–58. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgish, Gerald, and Sheintuch, Gloria. 1976. On the justification for language-specific sub-grammatical relations. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 6:2.65–88.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Franklin B. 1944. The Bhagavad Gita. (Harvard Oriental series, 38.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gaeffke, Peter. 1967. Untersuchungen zur Syntax des Hindi. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonda, Jan. 1951. Remarks on the Sanskrit passive. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia M. 1974. Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts, ed. by Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry, 43–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Larry R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. UCLA dissertation. (Distributed by Indiana Linguistics Club.).Google Scholar
Hou, John Y. 1977. Passivization in Chinese: toward a relational analysis. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jain, Jagdish. 1977. The passive in universal grammar. San Francisco State University, MS.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1927, 1940. Modern English grammar. Vols. 3 and 5. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1965. Essentials of English grammar. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David. 1974. Towards a theory of relationally based grammar. University of Illinois dissertation. (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.).Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1973. An introduction to spoken Kashmiri. Urbana: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1966. Introduction to Hindi syntax. Urbana: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1975. Some universals of passive in relational grammar. CLS 11. 340–52.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L., and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–100.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert. 1976. On the subjectless ‘pseudo-passive’ in standard Dutch and the semantics of background agents. In Li, 385–415.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1970. Global rules. Lg. 46. 627–39.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1971. Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1977. Linguistic gestalts. CLS 13. 236–87.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1971. Passive resistance. CLS 7. 149–61.Google Scholar
Lazdina, Tereza B. 1966. Latvian. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Le, Tam Duy. 1976. Vietnamese passives. CLS 12. 438–49.Google Scholar
Lee, Chung-Min. 1974. Abstract syntax and Korean with reference to English. Seoul: Pan Korea Book Corp.Google Scholar
Li, Charles (ed.) 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles and Thompson, Sandra. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li, 437–89.Google Scholar
McCawley, Noriko Akatsuka. 1975. Arguments against Keenan-Shimizu's treatment of Japanese passives. To appear in Papers in Japanese linguistics, ed. by Shibatani, Masayoshi. Los Angeles: USC.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry. L. 1977. Conversational postulates revisited. Lg. 53. 277–84.Google Scholar
Noss, Richard B. 1964. Thai reference grammar. Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1977. On the semantics of passives in Hindi. Paper presented at the 187th meeting of the American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1978. The syntax and semantics of the compound verbs in Marathi. Paper presented at the 188th meeting of the American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David, and Postal, Paul M. 1977. Towards a universal characterization of passivization. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistic Society, 394–417.Google Scholar
Perry, James Whitney. 1950. Scientific Russian. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Pořízka, Vincenc. 1963. Hindi language course. Prague: Státní Pedagogické Nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poutsma, Henrik. 1926. A grammar of later modern English, Part II, Section 2. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Riddle, Elizabeth. 1975. Relational grammar and some aspects of Swahili syntax. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on African Linguistics (Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 20), 260–69. Columbus.Google Scholar
Riddle, Elizabeth, Sheintuch, Gloria; and Ziv, Yael. 1977. Pseudo-passivization: on the role of pragmatics in determining rule unity. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 7:1.147–56.Google Scholar
Roy, Jules. 1963. La bataille de Dien Bien Phu. Paris: René Julliard.Google Scholar
Saad, George. 1975. Transitivity, causation and the derivation of passives in Arabic. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar
Saksena, Anuradha. 1977. A re-analysis of the passive in Hindi. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, topic-actor, or none of the above. In Li, 491–518.Google Scholar
Schmerling, Susan. 1978. Synonymy judgements as syntactic evidence. Syntax and semantics, 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Cole, Peter, 299–313. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 1977. Raising, meaning and conversational implicature. CLS 13. 590–602.Google Scholar
Stucky, Susan U. 1976. Locatives as objects in Tshiluba: a function of transitivity. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 6:2.174–200.Google Scholar
Trithart, Lee. 1975. Relational grammar and Chichewa subjectivization rules. CLS 11. 615–24.Google Scholar
Unbegaun, Boris O. 1957. Russian grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert. 1976. Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1879. Sanskrit grammar. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Wongbiasaj, Soranee. 1977. On the passive in Thai. Urbana: University of Illinois, Dept. of Linguistics, MS.Google Scholar
Ziff, Paul. 1966. The non-synonymy of actives and passives. Philosophical Review 75. 226–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar