Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-7hcng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-20T18:05:26.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Positional Neutralization: A Case Study from Child Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Sharon Inkelas  and
Yvan Rose
Sharon Inkelas*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Yvan Rose*
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland
*
Inkelas, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, 1203 Dwinelle Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 [inkelas@berkeley.edu]
Rose, Department of Linguistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's NL A1B 3X9, Canada [yrose@mun.ca]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new longitudinal diary study of a child (E) learning American English reveals two patterns of segmental neutralization: velar fronting, in which /k/ and /g/ are realized as [t] and [d], and lateral gliding, in which /l/ is realized as [j]. Both phenomena are restricted to prosodically strong positions, affecting only consonants in word-initial position or in the onsets of stressed syllables. An explanation for positional velar fronting that combines phonetic and grammatical considerations is proposed to account for the occurrence of the effect in children but not adults: the greater gestural magnitude of prosodically strong onsets in English interacts with the anatomy of the young child's vocal tract to produce coronalization of prosodically strong velars. E extended the resulting pattern to lateral gliding, which developed later and has similar grammatical conditioning but less direct phonetic motivation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 707 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albright, Adam. 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. Paradigms in phonological theory, ed. by Downing, Laura, Hall, Tracy Alan, and Raffelsiefen, Renate, 17–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1977. Analogy. (Trends in linguistics: State-of-the-art reports 10.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo, and Brewer, Warren A.. 1977. Analogy: A basic bibliography. (Library and information sources in linguistics 1.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 2002. Positional neutralization: A phonologization approach to typological patterns. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill. 1997. Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14. 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas. 1995. Sound change in child language: A study of inter-word variation. Language and Speech 38. 331–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Barbara Handford, Gilbert, John; and Ingram, David (eds.) 1996. Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Barbara Handford, and Stemberger, Joseph P.. 1998. Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bills, Shannon, and Golston, Chris. 2002. Prosodic and linear licensing in English acquisition. Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (2001), ed. by Carmichael, L., Huang, C.-H., and Samiian, V., 13–26. Fresno: California State University, Fresno.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette, and Garrett, Andrew. 1998. The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis. Language 74. 508–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2004. *T to K: An Austronesian sound change revisited. Oceanic Linguistics 43. 365–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosma, James F. 1975. Anatomic and physiologic development of the speech apparatus. The nervous system, vol. 3: Human communication and its disorders, ed. by Tower, Donald B., 469–81. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Brett, Linda, Chiat, Shula; and Pilcher, Christine. 1987. Stages and units in output processing: Some evidence from voicing and fronting processes in children. Language and Cognitive Processes 2. 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Eugene L. 2003. Children's unnatural phonology. Berkeley Linguistics Society 29. 523–34.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene L., and Seidl, Amanda. 2005. On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1. 289–316.Google Scholar
Chiat, Shula. 1983. Why Mikey's right and my key's wrong: The significance of stress and word boundaries in a child's output system. Cognition 14. 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, Shula. 1989. The relation between prosodic structure, syllabification and segmental realization: Evidence from a child with fricative stopping. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 3. 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Abigail. 1990. Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Crelin, Edmund S. 1987. The human vocal tract: Anatomy, function, development, and evolution. New York: Vantage Press.Google Scholar
DeLacy, Paul. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. 1992. Variation in developing and fully developed phonetic inventories. Phonological development: Models, research, implications, ed. by Ferguson, Charles A., Menn, Lise, and Stoel-Gammon, Carol, 191–210. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. 1996. Context effects in the acquisition of fricatives. In Bernhardt, et al., 136–48.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. 2002. On the composition and treatment of children's phonological error patterns. Paper presented at GLOW Workshop on Language Acquisition, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Dunphy, Carla. 2006. Another perspective on consonant harmony in Dutch. St. John's: Memorial University of Newfoundland dissertation.Google Scholar
Echols, Catherine, and Newport, Elissa. 1992. The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 2. 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jan, Gibbon, Fiona; and Fourakis, Marios. 1997. On discrete changes in the acquisition of the alveolar/velar stop consonant contrast. Language and Speech 40. 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Mary Louise. 1996. Word position and the production of fricatives. In Bernhardt, et al., 149–58.Google Scholar
Fey, Marc E., and Gandour, Jack. 1982. Rule discovery in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 9. 71–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fikkert, Paula. 1994. On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Dordrecht: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fikkert, Paula. 1998. The acquisition of Dutch prosody. The acquisition of Dutch, ed. by Gillis, Steven and de Houwer, Annick, 163–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh, and Giedd, Jay. 1999. Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106. 1511–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, Samuel G. 1973. Maturation of the speech mechanism. Folia Phoniatrica 25. 161–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, Samuel G. 1989. Palatometric specification of stop, affricate and sibilant sounds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32. 736–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Fougeron, Cécile. 1999. Prosodically conditioned articulatory variations: A review. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 97. 1–73.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, and Keating, Patricia A.. 1996. Articulatory strengthening in prosodic domain-initial position. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 92. 61–87.Google Scholar
Gerken, LouAnn. 1996. Prosodic structure in young children's language processing. Language 72. 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona. 1999. Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/phonological disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 42. 382–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, Fiona, Murdoch, Bruce E., Hardcastle, William J., Theodoros, Deborah; and Cahill, Louise. 2001. Q2: A procedure for profiling impaired speech motor control of the tongue using electropalatography. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 8. 239–42.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona, and Scobbie, James M.. 1997. Covert contrasts in children with phonological disorder. Australian Communication Quarterly Autumn 1997. 13–16.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan W. 2002. The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32. 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goad, Heather. 1997. Consonant harmony in child language: An optimality-theoretic account. Focus on phonological acquisition, ed. by Hannahs, S. J. and Young-Scholten, Martha, 113–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goodell, Elizabeth W., and Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1993. Acoustic evidence for the development of gestural coordination in the speech of 2-year-olds: A longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 707–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Haas, Mary. 1968. Notes on a Chipewyan dialect. International Journal of American Linguistics 34. 165–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark, and Reiss, Charles. 1998. Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 656–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2004. Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: The early stages. Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition, ed. by Kager, Rene, Pater, Joe, and Zonneveld, Wim, 158–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett, Nigel. 1988. Acoustic properties of /k/ and /t/ in normal and phonologically disordered children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2. 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd edn. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoijer, Harry. 1942. Phonetic and phonemic change in the Athapaskan languages. Language 18. 218–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2005. Segmental structure and phonological change: The irrelevance of acquisition. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Huffman, Marie. 1997. Phonetic variation in intervocalic onset /l/'s in English. Journal of Phonetics 25. 115–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1976. Phonologization. Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by Juilland, Alphonse, 107–18. Saratoga: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. 1974. Fronting in child phonology. Journal of Child language 1. 233–41.Google Scholar
Ingram, David. 1989. First language acquisition: Method, description, and explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Mester, Armin; and Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 571–613.Google Scholar
Iverson, Greg, and Salmons, Joseph. 2003. The ingenerate motivation of sound change. Motives for language change, ed. by Hickey, Raymond, 199–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Catalina Maria. 1995. Verb errors in the early acquisition of Mexican and Castilian Spanish. Proceedings of the 27th annual Child Language Research Forum, ed. by Clark, Eve V., 175–86. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W. 1997. The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1988. The phonology-phonetics interface. Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. 1: Linguistic theory: Foundations, ed. by Newmeyer, Frederick J., 281–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Margaret, and Stoel-Gammon, Carol. 1997. The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of children's prosodic development. Language 73. 113–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Raymond D. 1976. Anatomical and neuromuscular maturation of the speech mechanisms: Evidence from acoustic studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 19. 421–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, Raymond D. 1981. Articulatory-acoustic perspective on speech development. Language behavior in infancy and early childhood, ed. by Stark, Rachel E., 105–26. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kent, Raymond D. 1992. The biology of phonological development. Phonological development: Models, research, implications, ed. by Ferguson, Charles A., Menn, Lise, and Stoel-Gammon, Carol, 65–90. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Raymond D., and Miolo, Giuliana. 1995. Phonetic abilities in the first year of life. The handbook of child language, ed. by Fletcher, Paul and MacWhinney, Brian, 303–34. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1988. Phonological change. Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. 1: Linguistic theory: Foundations, ed. by Newmeyer, Frederick J., 363–415. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kjparsky, Paul. 1995. The phonological basis of sound change. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Goldsmith, John, 640–70. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Menn, Lise. 1977. On the acquisition of phonology. Language and thought, ed. by Macnamara, John, 47–78. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi (ed.) 2003. Analogy, levelling, markedess: Principles of change in phonology and morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Clara. 1994. On the acquisition of place. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1985. A secret language in Taiwanese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 13. 91–121.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Macken, Marlys. 1979. Developmental reorganization of phonology: A hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua 49. 11–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, Marlys, and Barton, David. 1979. A longitudinal study of the acquisition of the voicing contrast in American-English word-initial stops, as measured by voice onset time. Journal of Child Language 7. 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, John. 1982. Names for things: A study of child language. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Chloe, and Chiat, Shula. 2003. A foot domain account of prosodically-conditioned substitutions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17. 645–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, John. 2005. Taking a free ride in morphophonemic learning. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4. 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. Chicago Linguistic Society 17.2.178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. The production of speech, ed. by MacNeilage, Peter F., 189–216. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe. 1997. Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition 6. 201–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2002. Form and substance in phonological development. Proceedings of the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Mikkelsen, Line and Potts, Chris, 348–72. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe, and Werle, Adam. 2001. Typology and variation in child consonant harmony. Proceedings of HILP5, ed. by Féry, Caroline, Green, Antony Dubach, and van, Ruben Vijver, de, 119–39. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Priestly, Tom. 1977. One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language 4. 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, Der-Hwa V. 2000. Phonological variation and sound change in Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 39. 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, Leslie A. 1980. Overextension in early language development. Journal of Child Language 7. 321–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, Keren. 1978. A note on Fort Resolution Chipewyan. International Journal of American Lingustics 44. 144–45.Google Scholar
Rose, Yvan. 2000. Headedness and prosodic licensing in the L1 acquisition of phonology. Montreal: McGill University dissertation.Google Scholar
Rvachew, Susan, and Andrews, Ellen. 2002. The influence of syllable position on children's production of consonants. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16. 183–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salidis, Joanna, and Johnson, Jacqueline S.. 1997. The production of minimal words: A longitudinal study of phonological development. Language Acquisition 6. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scobbie, James M. 1998. Interactions between the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society 34.2.343–58.Google Scholar
Smit, Ann Bosma. 1993. Phonologic error distribution in the Iowa-Nebraska Articulation Norms Project: Consonant singletons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 533–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, Jennifer. 2000. Prominence, augmentation, and neutralization in phonology. Berkeley Linguistics Society 26. 247–57.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2002. Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1973. The acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard, and Fujimura, Osamu. 1993. Allophonic variation in English /1/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21. 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stertade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, ms.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation. The role of speech perception in phonology, ed. by Hume, Elizabeth and Johnson, Keith, 219–50. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, Carol. 1996. On the acquisition of velars in English. In Bernhardt, et al., 201–14.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, Carol, and Dunn, Carla. 1985. Normal and disordered phonology in children. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, Carol, and Stemberger, Joseph P.. 1994. Consonant harmony and under-specification in child phonology. First and second language phonology, ed. by Yavas, Mehmet, 63–80. San Diego: Singular.Google Scholar
Trigo, Rosario L. 1988. On the phonological derivation and behavior of nasal glides. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. Schuchhardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change: Four essays by Hugo Schuchhardt, Theo Vennemann, Terence H. Wilbur, ed. by Vennemann, Theo and Wilbur, Terence H., 115–79. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Vorperian, Houri K., Kent, Raymond D., Lindstrom, Mary J., Kalina, Cliff M., Gentry, Lindell R.; and Yandell, Brian S.. 2005. Development of vocal tract during early childhood: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117. 338–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedel, Andrew. 2004. Self-organization and the development of higher-order phonological patterns. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.Google Scholar
White, S. David. 2001. Covert contrast, merger and substitution in children's productions of /k/ and /t/. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Wrench, Alan A., Gibbon, Fiona E., McNeil, Alison M.; and Wood, Sara E.. 2002. An EPG therapy protocol for remediation and assessment of articulation disorders. Proceedings of ICSLP-2002, ed. by Hansen, John H. L. and Pellom, Bryan, 965–68. Denver, CO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Karl, and Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1992. Illustrations of the IPA: Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 22. 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl. 2003. Positional markedness, positional faithfulness and licensing. Optimality theory in phonology, ed. by McCarthy, John, 365–78. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1970. The free-ride principle and two rules of complete assimilation in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 6.1.579–88.Google Scholar