Hostname: page-component-699b5d5946-zvthx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-02T03:42:47.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems for the Pronominal Argument Hypothesis in Maliseet-Passamaquoddy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Philip S. LeSourd*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Student Building 130, 701 E. Kirkwood Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405-7100 [plesourd@indiana.edu]

Abstract

According to the PRONOMINAL ARGUMENT HYPOTHESIS, the characteristic features of many so-called nonconfigurational languages may be accounted for on the assumption that affixes of verbs or auxiliaries in such languages either function as syntactic arguments or identify null pronouns that fill this role. Overt NPs then stand as adjuncts to clauses that are formally complete without them. Several studies have proposed analyses of Algonquian languages that incorporate versions of this hypothesis. This article explores data from several areas of the morphology and syntax of the Eastern Algonquian language Maliseet-Passamaquoddy that suggest that it is not such a pronominal argument language.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anonymous. 1975. Wahant [The devil]. Indian Township, ME: Wabnaki Bilingual Education Program.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter, and Bresnan, Joan. 1996. Non-configurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14. 215–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1991. On some subject/object asymmetries in Mohawk. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9. 537–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1996. The poly synthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. Linguistic structures of native America (Viking Fund publications in anthropology 6), ed. by Osgood, Cornelius, 85129. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Montague. 1899. Maliseet vocabulary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Cooperative Society.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1987. Discontinuous constituents in Fox. Native American languages and grammatical typology, ed. by Kroeber, Paul D. and Moore, Robert E., 5373. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1979. Delaware verbal morphology: A descriptive and comparative study. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1. 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2. 3976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, William. 1911. Algonquian (Fox). Handbook of American Indian languages (Bureau of American Ethnology bulletin 40), part 1, ed. by Boas, Franz, 735873. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Junker, Marie-Odile. 1994. Syntaxe du quantifieur universel en algonquin. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 39. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathol, Andreas, and Rhodes, Richard A. 2000. Constituency and linearization of Ojibwe nominals. Proceedings of WSCLA 4: The workshop on structure and constituency in languages of the Americas, ed. by Caldecott, Marion, Gessner, Suzanne, and Kim, Eun-Sook, 7591. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Laurent, Joseph. 1884. New familiar Abenakis and English dialogues. Québec: Leger Brousseau.Google Scholar
Leavitt, Robert M. 1996. Passamaquoddy-Maliseet. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
LeSourd, Philip S. 1995. Diminutive verb forms in Passamaquoddy. International Journal of American Linguistics 61. 103–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeSourd, Philip S. 2004. The internal structure of the noun phrase in Maliseet-Passamaquoddy. Papers of the thirty-fifth Algonquian conference, ed. by Wolfart, H. C. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
LeSourd, Philip S. 2006. Tales from Maliseet country: The Maliseet texts of Karl V. Teeter. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1993. Comitative coordination: A case study in group formation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11. 347–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, J. Dyneley. 1900. Some Passamaquoddy witchcraft tales. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 38. 181–89.Google Scholar
Prince, J. Dyneley. 1921. Passamaquoddy texts. (Publications of the American Ethnological Society 10.) New York: G. E. Stechert & Co.Google Scholar
Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1995. Discontinuous constituents in Swampy Cree. Papers of the twenty-sixth Algonquian conference, ed. by Pentland, David H., 394412. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1999. On the characterization of discontinuous constituents: Evidence from Swampy Cree. International Journal of American Linguistics 65. 201–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Kevin, and Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1995. Hierarchical structure in a non-configurational language: Asymmetries in Swampy Cree. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 14. 431–45.Google Scholar
Safir, Ken. 2004. The syntax of anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Linda. 1988. Asymmetric feature distribution in pronominal ‘coordinations.‘ Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, and descriptions, ed. by Barlow, Michael and Ferguson, Charles A., 237–49. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sherwood, David Fairchild. 1986. Maliseet-Passamaquoddy verb morphology. (Canadian Ethnology Service paper 105.) Ottawa: Canadian Museum of Civilization.Google Scholar
Teeter, Karl V. 1963. Responses to stick figure pictures. Tape recording, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S., and Rhodes, Richard A. 1992. Information distribution in Ojibwa. Pragmatics of word order flexibility, ed. by Payne, Doris, 117–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar