Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-f9ccc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-15T10:30:23.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Repeated Morph Constraint: Toward an Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Lise Menn  and
Brian MacWhinney
Lise Menn
Affiliation:
Boston University
Brian MacWhinney
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many languages use haplology, suppletion, and the blocking of derivations to achieve avoidance of ‘accidental’ repetition of surface morphs. At the same time, many languages permit accidental repetition and even encourage ‘deliberate’ repetition through reduplication. Strong universal constraints against morph repetition therefore fail. This furthermore implies the inadequacy of accounts of morphological processes in terms of matching templates or schemas. We present a psycholinguistic processing model built on evidence from language acquisition, and drawing on activation theory, which affords a unification of the linguistic data while allowing for their variety.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 519 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abraham, R. C. 1940. The principles of Tiv. Farnborough, England: Gregg.Google Scholar
Aitchison, Jean, and Bailey, Guy. 1979. Unhappiness about not unhappy people. JL 15.245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John. 1983. A.C.T. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Marc A. 1974. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan. 1978. Language samples. Universals of human language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph et al., I.153–202. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14.150–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler Platt, Carole, and MacWhinney, Brian. 1983. Solving a problem vs. remembering the solution: Error assimilation as a strategy in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10.401–14.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., and Slobin, Dan I. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past. Lg. 58.265–89.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1968. On haplology in Indo-European. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, Courtney. 1968. The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development 39.433–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Desmond T. 1955. An introduction to Tswana grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and language typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L., and Baker, William J. 1979. Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. Language acquisition, ed. by Fletcher, Paul & Garman, Michael, 209–24. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1977. Phono-morphological dissimilation. Phonologica 1976 (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 19), ed. by Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Pfeiffer, O., 41–8. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1982. Comparative natural morphology: Child language, aphasia, and morphological universals. Collitz Lecture, given at LSA Summer Institute.Google Scholar
Ervin, Susan. 1964. Imitation and structural change in children's language. New directions in the study of language, ed. by Lenneberg, Eric. 163–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Espinosa, Aurelio M. 1946. Estudios sobre el español de Nuevo Méjico, II: Morfología. Traducción, reelaboración y notas de Á. Rosenblat. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Filología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Fortune, George. 1960. Elements of Shona. Cape Town: Longmans Southern Africa.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Lg. 47.27–52.Google Scholar
Garrett, Merrill. 1982. Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. Normality and pathology in cognitive functions, ed. by Ellis, A. M. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
George, Leland M. 1980. Analogical generalizations of natural language syntax. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Grammont, Maurice. 1895. La dissimilation consonantique dans les langues indoeuropéenes et dans les langues romanes. Dijon: Imprimerie Darantière.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Paul. 1927. Le développement des éléments formels dans le langage de l'enfant. Journal de Psychologie 24.203–29. [Translation in Studies of child language development, ed. by Charles A. Ferguson & Dan I. Slobin, 240–51. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.]Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1979. Phonology and noun structure, 4: Noun modifiers. Aghem grammatical structure, ed. by Hyman, Larry, 1–72. Los Angeles: Dept. of Linguistics, USC.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V. 1972. Rol' usečenija v russkom slovoobrazovanii. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 15.95–125.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Ellen Schauber. 1974. Navajo spatial enclitics: A case for unbounded right-ward movement. LI 5.507–34.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, Stan A. II. 1977. The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15.589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, Stan A. II.. 1978. Children's judgements of grammatical and ungrammatical irregular past tense verbs. Child Development 49.319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, Werner F. 1949. Speech development of a bilingual child, IV. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. L. 1975. Turkish grammar (revised edn.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 1976. On the structure of morphological relations. Linguistische Berichte 44.1–29.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L., and Rumelhart, David E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88.375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, Marlys A. 1980. The child's lexical representation: The ‘puzzle-puddle-pickle’ evidence. JL 16.1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1974. How Hungarian children learn to speak. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1978. The acquisition of morphophonology. (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43:1–2.) Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1982. Basic syntactic processes. Language acquisition: Syntax and semantics, ed. by Kuczaj, Stan A. II. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1983a. Miniature linguistic systems as tests of universal operating principles. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 12.467–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1983b. Hungarian language acquisition as an exemplification of a general model of grammatical development. To appear in The cross-cultural study of language acquisition, ed. by Slobin, Dan I. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, Michael, and Chalkley, C. 1980. The internal language of children's syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. Children's language, II, ed. by Nelson, Keith, 127–214. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
Maratsos, Michael, and Kuczaj, Stan A. II. 1978. Against the transformationalist account: A simpler analysis of auxiliary overmarking. Journal of Child Language 5.337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Lise. 1979. Pattern, control, and contrast in beginning speech: A case study in the acquisition of word form and function. Urbana: University of Illinois dissertation. [Duplicated by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1979.]Google Scholar
Menn, Lise, et al. 1982. A psycholinguistic model for paragrammatic speech. Paper read at the BABBLE meeting, Niagara Falls, Ont.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1977. On rules of infixing. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Nicklas, Thurston D. 1972. The elements of Choctaw. University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1970. Surface structure constraints in syntax. LI 1.187–256.Google Scholar
Platt, Diana. 1981. Old Provençal. Working papers in morphology (UCLA occasional papers in linguistics, 4), ed. by Thomas-Flinders, Tracy, 41–71.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1977. Counter-filtering rules. York Papers in Linguistics 7.7–45.Google Scholar
Réger, Zita. 1975. Közös törvényszerűségek az anyanyelvi-elsajátítás és a gyemekkori idegennyelvi-elsajátítás folyamatában. Magyar Nyelvőr 99.343–50.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1972. Doubl-ing. LI 3.61–86.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul M. 1974. Constraints on clitic order in Tagalog. Parangal kay Cecilio López (Philippine Journal of Linguistics, Special Monograph 4), ed. by Gonzales, Andrew, 214–31. [Also in UCLA Papers in Syntax 5.96–118, 1974.]Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1971. On the learning of morphological rules: A reply to Palermo and Eberhart. The ontogenesis of grammar: A theoretical symposium, ed. by Slobin, Dan I., 215–23. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. Studies of child language development, ed. by Ferguson, Charles A. & Slobin, Dan I., 175–208. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, Neilson V. 1973. The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Martha Bellamy. 1972. Stem endings and the acquisition of inflections. Language Learning 22.43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. 1981. Morphological haplology. Lg. 57.791–817.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. 1982. The lexicon in a model of language production. San Diego: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Tegey, Habibullah. 1975. A study of Pashto clitics and implications for linguistic theory. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 5:1.154–96.Google Scholar
Tegey, Habibullah. 1977. The grammar of clitics: Evidence from Pashto and other languages. Urbana: University of Illinois dissertation.Google Scholar
Thibadeau, Robert, Just, Marcel A.; and Carpenter, Patricia A. 1982. A model of the time course and content of reading. Cognitive Science 6.157–203.Google Scholar
Walter, S. 1975. Zur Entwicklung morphologische Strukturen bei Kinder. Heidelberg: Diplomarbeit.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1970. A case of non-chronological rule insertion. LI 1.525–7.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1973. The phonology of reduplication. Urbana: University of Illinois dissertation. [Duplicated by Indiana University Linguistics Club.]Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1969. Phonological constraints in syntactic descriptions. Papers in Linguistics 1.411–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1982. An expanded view of morphology in the syntax-phonology interface. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress of Linguists, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Pullum, Geoffrey. 1983. The phonology/syntax interface. To appear, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar