Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T05:17:42.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shape in Grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Paul Friedrich
Paul Friedrich*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article deals with some semantic categories of shape as coded in grammar. An analysis is given of three patterns in Tarascan grammar: the ‘numeral classifiers’, the covertly ‘classificatory verbs’, and the suffixes of locative space—particularly the semantically complex imagery of the so-called ‘body part suffixes’; the ‘edge-orifice’ suffix is interpreted in considerable detail. The three semantically intersecting patterns are shown to mediate between abstract geometrical features and a concrete map of reference. A brief global survey indicates that many Old and New World languages have similar patterns, and raises questions about the universality of shape categories and their role in abstract thought and metaphor.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 379 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aronson, Howard. 1967. The grammatical categories of the indicative in the contemporary Bulgarian literary language. To honor Roman Jakobson, 1. 82–98. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ashton, E. C. 1947. Swahili grammar. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Bazell, C. E. 1949. On the problem of the morpheme. Archivum Linguisticum 1. 1–15.Google Scholar
Bazell, C. E. 1952. The correspondence fallacy in structural linguistics. Studies by Members of the English Department, Istanbul University, 3. 1–41.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1968. Tzeltal numeral classifiers: a study in ethnographic semantics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911. Introduction; Kwakiutl. Handbook of American Indian languages, ed. by Boas, F. (Bureau of American Ethnology, bulletin 40, part 1.) Washington D. C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1965. How to choose a Burmese numeral classifier. Context and meaning in cultural anthropology (in honor of A. Irving Hallowell), ed. by Spiro, Melford, 243–65. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968a. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968b. Language and symbolic systems. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davison, William, Elford, L. W.; and Hoijer, Harry. 1963. Athapascan classificatory verbs. Studies in the Athapascan languages (University of California publications in linguistics, 29), pp. 30–41. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. Universais in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, E. and Harms, R., 1–91. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1969a. On the meaning of the Tarascan suffixes of space. (Indiana University publications in anthropology and linguistics, Memoir 23 of IJAL.) Bloomington.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1969b. Metaphor-like relations between referential subsets. Lingua 24. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1970. Morphotactics and grammatical meaning (ms).Google Scholar
Gregersen, E. A. 1967. Prefix and pronoun in Bantu. (Indiana University publications in anthropology and linguistics, Memoir 23 of IJAL.) Bloomington.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1942. The use of numeral classifiers in Thai. Lg. 18. 201–6.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1948. Classificatorv verbs in Muskogee. IJAL 14. 244–6.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1951. The use of numeral classifiers in Burmese. University of California publications in Semitic philology 11. 191–200.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1967. Language and taxonomy in northwestern California. AA 69. 358–62.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harry. 1945. Classificatory verb stems in the Apachean languages. IJAL 11. 13–23.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Alexander von. 1836. Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues. Berlin. (Reprinted, Bonn: Dümmler, 1960.)Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1961. On typology of cognitive styles in language. AL 3:1.22–54.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6. 240–88.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1958. Typological studies and their contribution to historical comparative linguistics. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Linguists, 17–35. Oslo: University Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael E. 1968. Noun-classification systems in Athapascan, Eyak, Tlingit, and Haida verbs. IJAL 34. 194–204.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1920. Classificatory particles in the language of Kiriwina. BSOS 1:4.33–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1935. Coral gardens and their magic, vol. 2: the language of magic and gardening. London. George Allen & Unwin. (Reprinted, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965.)Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1922. The Takelma language of southwestern Oregon. Handbook of American Indian languages, part 2, pp. 1–296. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1951. The status of linguistics as a science. Selected writings of Edward Sapir, ed. by Mandelbaum, D. G., 160–7. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1911. Haida. Handbook of American Indian languages, part 1, pp. 205–82. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Tucker, A., and Bryan, M. 1966. Linguistic analysis of non-Bantu languages of northeastern Africa. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. and Voegelin, F. M. 1957. Hopi domains. (Indiana University publications in anthropology and linguistics, Memoir 14 of IJAL.) Bloomington.Google Scholar
West, Robert C. 1948. Cultural geography of the modern Tarascan area. (Smithsonian Institution, Institute of Social Anthropology, publ. 7.) Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Whore, B. L. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: selected writings. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar