Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T13:58:31.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simplicity, Ordered Rules, and the First Sound Shift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Joseph B. Voyles
Joseph B. Voyles*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The following article is, first, an algorithm or set of rules for deriving the phonology of Proto-Germanic from that of Indo-European. The input to this set of rules consists of individual IE lexical items specified completely (i.e. allophonically) in terms of Jakobsonian distinctive features; the output consists of the corresponding lexical items of Proto-Germanic. Second, the article gives a criterion of simplicity for the construction of a similar algorithm describing phonological change from a prior stage of a language to a later one. The claim made for such a set of optimally written rules is that if one orders the rules so that the fewest possible feature specifications are used in their formulation, the order in which the rules occur reflects the historical chronology of the sound changes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 43 , Issue 3-Part1 , September 1967 , pp. 636 - 660
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antonsen, Elmer. 1965. On defining stages in prehistoric Germanic. Lg. 41. 19–37.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York, Holt.Google Scholar
Boer, R. C. 1918. Oergermaansch handboek. Haarlem, Willink.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl D. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. The logical basis of linguistic theory. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, pp. 914–78. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Franklin. 1943. The Indo-European semivowels. Lg. 19. 83–124.Google Scholar
Fant, C. G. M. 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Feist, Sigmund. 1939. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der gotischen Sprache. 3rd ed. Leiden, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., and Katz, Jerrold J. (eds.) 1964. The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fourquet, J. 1948. Les mutations consonantiques du germanique. (Publications de la Faculté des Lettres de l'Université de Strasbourg, 3.) Paris, Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1961. On the role of simplicity in linguistic descriptions. Structure of language and its mathematical aspects, ed. by Jakobson, Roman, pp. 89–94. (Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 12.) Providence, R. I., American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1964a. On the bases of phonology. In Fodor and Katz 1964, pp. 324–33.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1964b. (Reprint of 1962 paper.) In Fodor and Katz 1964, pp. 334–52.Google Scholar
Hammerich, L. L. 1955. Die germanische und die hochdeutsche Lautverschiebung. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 77. 1–30, 165–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, Hermann. 1931. Handbuch des Urgermanischen, vol. 1. Heidelberg, Winter.Google Scholar
Holthausen, F. 1934. Altenglisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg, Winter.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, C. G. M., and Halle, Morris. 1961. Preliminaries to speech analysis. 4th ed. Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Halle, Morris. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Jóhannesson, Alexander. 1956. Isländisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern, Francke.Google Scholar
Karsten, T. E. 1928. Die Germanen. (Grundriss der germanischen Philologie, ed. by Paul, Hermann, vol. 9.) Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1913. Urgermanisch. 3rd ed. (Grundriss der germanischen Philologie, ed. by Paul, Hermann, vol. 2.) Strassburg, Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1926. Nominale Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialekte. Halle, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1957. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 17th ed. Berlin, de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahe, Hans. 1958. Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. 3rd ed., vol. 1. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans. 1960. Germanische Sprachwissenchaft. 4th ed. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lane, George S. 1936. The labiovelars before o in Germanic. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 35. 17–26.Google Scholar
Lane, George S. 1939. Pure labials from labiovelars in Germanic. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 38. 184–200.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1952. Proto-Indo-European phonology. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1953. The conservatism of Germanic phonology. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 52. 140–52.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1937. La gémination consonantique d'origine expressive dans les langues germaniques. Copenhagen, Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1942. Caractères généraux des langues germaniques. 5th ed. Paris, Hachette.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1954. The stops and spirants of early Germanic. Lg. 30. 1–42.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. 1. Bern, Francke.Google Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia, LSA.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1878. Zur Accent- und Lautlehre der germanischen Sprachen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literature 5. 63–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, Franklin C. 1964. Family-tree diagrams. Lg. 40. 557–66.Google Scholar
Steirtberg, Wilhelm. 1896. Urgermanische Grammatik. Heidelberg, 1896.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1909. Handbuch des Alt-Irischen, I. Teil: Grammatik. Heidelberg, Winter.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. Feeeman. 1939. The inner chronology of the Germanic consonant shift. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 38. 337–59.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, F. 1956. Das System der starken Verba und die Periodisierung im älteren Germanischen. Mededeelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, afdeeling letterkunde, nieuwe reeks, 19:1. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, N. 1903. Zur relativen chronologie urgermanischer Lautgesetze. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 28. 243–53.Google Scholar
Verner, Karl. 1877. Eine Ausnahme der ersten Lautverschiebung. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 23. 97–130.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1907. Historical German grammar, vol. 1. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar