Hostname: page-component-6565fbc58-6b8jf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-13T00:22:54.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Remarks on Antonymy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Magnus Ljung
Magnus Ljung*
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The notion of ‘antonymous adjective’, as used in recent and not-so-recent literature, is discussed here; and the criteria for antonymy suggested by different researchers are found to yield largely the same results. It is suggested that only noun-based adjectives can be ‘antonymous’, and that a useful delimitation of the term 'antonymous adjective can be achieved in terms of the inherentness of the underlying nouns: all scalar nouns taken to be inherently possessed by some entity may serve as the base for a set of an-tonymous adjectives. This conclusion is supported by a comparison with adjectives derived from so-called inalienable nouns: the two types of adjective are found to share many characteristics. Finally, some implications for grammatical descriptions are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 74 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bierwisch, M. 1967. Some semantic universals of German adjectivals. Foundations of Language 3. 1–36.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. 1969. On certain problems of semantic representations. Foundations of Language 5. 153–84.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. 1970. Semantics. New horizons in linguistics, ed. by Lyons, J., 166–84. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1965. Entailment rules in semantic theory. (POLA 10.) Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, E. & Harms, R. T., 1–90. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1970. Notes on the semantic structure of English adjectives. Lg. 46.816–37.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles, VI. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Katz, J. 1964. Analyticity and contradiction in natural languages. The structure of language, ed. by Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J., 519–43. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Klooster, W. G., and Verkuyl, H. J. 1972. Measuring duration in Dutch. Foundations of Language 8. 62–95.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1970. Linguistics and natural logic. Synthèse 22. 151–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, R. B. 1970. Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds. Progress in linguistics, ed. by Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. E., 174–86. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. 1970. English denominal adjectives. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1967. Meaning and the description of languages. Kotoba no uchu 2, nos. 9–11.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. 1969. Categories and types of present-day English word-formation. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. 1971. The acquisition and development of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Salzmann, Z. 1965. Arapaho VI: noun. IJAL 31. 136–51.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1917. Review of Het identificeerend karakter der possesieve flexie in talen van Nord-Amerika, by Uhlenbeck, C. C. IJAL 1. 86–90.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1944. Grading: a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11. 93–116. (Reprinted in his Selected writings in language, culture and personality. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1949.)Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. 1970. Grammatikens indelning. Språkvård 3. 3–14.Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. 1971. Ord på gott och ont. Papers from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, publication 12.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1963. The transformational grammar of English adjectives. (Transformations and discourse analysis papers, 52.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1968. Adjectives and nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K. E. 1964. Affixal negation in English and other languages: an investigation of restricted productivity. Word 20:2, supplement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar