Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-kmjgn Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2026-04-24T17:19:26.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stress, syntax, and meter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Paul Kiparsky
Paul Kiparsky*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The way stress is patterned in English verse depends on word and phrase structure, according to strict rules which are not accounted for by either traditional or more recent metrics. This paper is a contribution to the exploration of these rules, and an attempt to develop a formal metrical theory capable of expressing them. The presentation is organized as follows. After an introductory review of some of the problems and proposed solutions in metrics, I give (§1) a sketch of the theory to be defended here. §2 is devoted to justifying this theory on the basis of a fairly close examination of Shakespeare's verse. Then the scope of the investigation is extended in several directions: to other varieties of iambic pentameter (§§3.1–2), trochaic meter (§3.3), ternary meters (§3.4), and finally (§3.5) to some similarities and differences between the metrics of English and other languages, on which the presen: approach sheds new light.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 576 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnold, E. Vernon. 1905. Vedic metre. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Auden, W. H. 1962. The dyer's hand. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beaver, Joseph C. 1971a. The rules of stress in English verse. Lg. 47.486–614.Google Scholar
Beaver, Joseph C. 1971b. Current metrical issues. College English 33.177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, Robert. 1921. Milton's prosody. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. 1956. Robert Frost's Mowing: an inquiry into prosodic structure. Kenyon Review 18.421–451.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. 1965. A theory of meter. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, David H. 1973. Lexicality and German derivational suffixes: a contribution to the Magnuson-Ryder theory of prosody. Language and Style 6.27–38.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Freeman, Donald. 1968a. On the primes of metrical style. Language and Style 1.63–101. [Also in Freeman 1968b:448–91.].Google Scholar
Freeman, Donald. (ed.) 1968b. Linguistics and literary style. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. 1957. The rhythm of recurrence: Epos. In his Anatomy of criticism, 251–262. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1973. Stress rules in English: a new version. Linguistic Inquiry 4.451–464.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris., and Keyser, J. 1966. Chaucer and the study of prosody. College English 28.187–219. [Reprinted in Freeman 1968b:366–426.].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris., and Keyser, J. 1971a. English stress: its form, its growth, and its role in verse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris., and Keyser, J. 1971b. Illustration and defense of a theory of the iambic pentameter. College English 33.154–176.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris., and Keyser, J. 1974. On the theoretical bases of metrical verse. To appear.Google Scholar
Hascall, Dudley. 1971. Trochaic meter. College English 33.217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. Style in language, ed. by Sebeok, T. A., 350–385. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1933. Notes on metre. In his Linguistica, 249–274. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard. [Reprinted in his selected Writings 647–76. London: Allen & Unwin, 1962. An earlier version was published as Den psykologiske grund til nogle metriske faenomener, Oversigt til det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs forhandlinger, 1900:487–526 (Copenhagen)].Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1966. Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7.69–98.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Metrics and morphophonemics in the Kalevala. Studies presented to Professor Roman Jakobson by his students, ed. by Gribble, C., 137–148. Cambridge, Mass.: Slavica. [Reprinted in Freeman 1968b:165–81.].Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1972. Metrics and morphophonemics in the Rigveda. Contributions to generative phonology, ed. by Brame, M., 171–200. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. The role of linguistics in a theory of poetry. Daedalus, Summer, 231–244.Google Scholar
Lanier, Sidney. 1880. The science of English verse. New York.Google Scholar
Lee, Gregory. 1969. English word-stress. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 389–396.Google Scholar
Maas, Paul. 1962. Greek metre. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Magnuson, Karl, and Ryder, Frank. 1970. The study of English prosody: an alternative proposal. College English 31.789–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1971. Second thoughts on English prosody. College English 33.198–216.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Lisa. 1972. The phrase phonology of English and French. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Sipe, Dorothy L. 1968. Shakespeare's metrics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. 1968. Poetic closure: a study of how poems end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarlinskaya, Marina. 1973. The syllabic structure and meter of English verse from the thirteenth through the nineteenth century. Language and Style 6.249–272.Google Scholar
Whitehall, Harold. 1956. From linguistics to criticism. Kenyon Review 18.411–421.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. 1970. The rule and the norm: Halle and Keyser on Chaucer's meter. College English 31.774–788.Google Scholar
Zeps, Valdis. 1963. The meter of the so-called trochaic Latvian folksongs. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 7.123–128.Google Scholar
Zeps, Valdis. 1973. Latvian folk meters and styles. A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P., 207–211. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Zhirmunsky, Viktor. 1966. Introduction to metrics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar