Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T08:03:18.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Tone Teaches Us About Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Larry M. Hyman
Larry M. Hyman*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
*
[hyman@berkeley.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In ‘Tone: Is it different?’ (Hyman 2011a), I suggested that ‘tone is like segmental phonology in every way—only more so’, emphasizing that there are some things that only tone can do. In this presidential address my focus extends beyond phonology, specifically addressing what tone tells us about the integration (vs. compartmentalization) of grammar. I discuss some rather striking examples that demonstrate problems for the strict separation of phonology, morphology, and syntax, each time posing the question, ‘What else is like this outside of tone?’. A particularly interesting property that is strictly limited to tone is what I term syntagmatic relativity. I suggest that the uniqueness of tonal phenomena is due to the versatility of pitch, which can be manipulated with a wide range of linguistic functions. Given this versatility, I end by considering the question, ‘Why isn't tone universal?’.

Keywords

toneparadigmsnonlocal phonologyphrase-level morphologyparadigmatic and syntagmatic contrasts

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 698 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahland, Michael Bryan. 2012. A grammar of Northern Mao (Màwés Aas'è). Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
Bateman, Janet. 1990. Iau segmental and tonal phonology. Miscellaneous Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia 10. 29–42.Google Scholar
Campbell, Eric. 2014. Aspects of the phonology and morphology of Zenzontepec Chatino, a Zapotecan language of Oaxaca, Mexico. Austin: University of Texas, Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Campbell, Eric. 2016. Tone and inflection in Zenzontepec Chatino. Tone and inflection, ed. by Palancar, Enrique L. and Léonard, Jean Léo, 141-62. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cassimjee, Farida, and Kisseberth, Charles W.. 1992. The tonology of depressor consonants: Evidence from Mijikenda and Nguni. Berkeley Linguistics Society (Special session on typology of tone languages) 18. 26–40. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v18i2.1543.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N., and Goldsmith, John (eds.) 1984a. Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N., and Goldsmith, John. 1984b. Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone: Introduction. In Clements & Goldsmith 1984a, 1–18.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N., Michaud, Alexis; and Patin, Cédric. 2011. Do we need tone features? Tones and features: Phonetic and phonological perspectives, ed. by Goldsmith, John A., Hume, Elizabeth, and Wetzels, Leo, 3–24. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2017. Construct forms of nouns in typological perspective. Paper presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Zurich, September 13, 2017.Google Scholar
Cruz, Emiliana. 2011. Phonology, tone and the functions of tone in San Juan Quiahije Chatino. Austin: University of Texas, Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Daly, John P., and Hyman, Larry M.. 2007. On the representation of tone in Peñoles Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics 73. 165–208. DOI: 10.1086/519057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine. 2003. The acquisition of Bantu languages. The Bantu languages, ed. by Nurse, Derek and Philippson, Gérard, 209-22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976a. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976b. An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2. 23–68.Google Scholar
Harry, Otelemate, and Hyman, Larry M.. 2014. Phrasal construction tonology: The case of Kalabari. Studies in Language 38. 649-89. DOI: 10.1075/sl.38.4.01hym.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey, and McPherson, Laura. 2013. Tonosyntax and reference restrictions in Dogon NPs. Language 89. 265-96. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2013.0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey. 2018. The computational nature of phonological generalizations. Phonological typology, ed. by Hyman, Larry M. and Plank, Frans, 126-95. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hoeschele, Marisa (ed.) 2017. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 12. (Special issue on animal music perception.) Online: http://comparative-cognition-and-behavior-reviews.org/vol_12/.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31. 213-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2011a. Tone: Is it different? The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., ed. by Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason, and Yu, Alan, 197–239. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2011b. Do tones have features? Tones and features: Phonetic and phonological perspectives, ed. by Goldsmith, John A., Hume, Elizabeth, and Wetzels, Leo, 50–80. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Kisseberth, Charles W.. 1998. Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Schuh, Russell G.. 1974. Universals of tone rules: Evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 81–115. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177809.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Udoh, Imelda. 2006. Relic noun-class structure in Leggbo. West African linguistics: Papers in honor of Russell G. Schuh (Studies in African Linguistics, supplement 11), ed. by Newman, Paul and Hyman, Larry M., 75–99. Columbus: The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics and Center for African Studies.Google Scholar
Jardine, Adam. 2016. Computationally, tone is different. Phonology 33. 247-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675716000129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W. 1984. Digo tonology. In Clements & Goldsmith 1984a, 105-82.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W., and Abasheikh, Mohammed I.. 2011. Chimwiini phonological phrasing revisited. Lingua 121. 1987–2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1977. The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 4. 185-99. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000900001598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013. Tone. The world atlas of language structures online, ed. by Dryer, Mat thew S. and Haspelmath, Martin, Ch. 13. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Online: http://wals.info/chapter/13, accessed December 22, 2017.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael R., Mwita, Leonard Chacha; and Paster, Mary. 2014. Kuria tone melodies. Africana Linguistica 20. 277-94. DOI: 10.2143/AL.20.0.3062073.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael R., Mwita, Leonard Chacha; and Paster, Mary. 2015. Problems in Kuria H tone assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33. 251-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-014-9251-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1947. Où en est la phonologie? Lingua 1. 34–58. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(49)90044-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumori, Akiko. 2017. Prosodic units and phonological processes of the Miyako-jima and Tara-jima systems in Miyako Ryukyuan. Paper presented at the Workshop on Prosody and Prosodic Interfaces in Japanese and Korean, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, October 11, 2017.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Justin Daniel. 2015. Aspects of phonology and morphology of Teotepec Eastern Chatino. Austin: University of Texas, Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura. 2014. Replacive grammatical tone in the Dogon languages: A factorial typology. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura. 2017. Tone features revisited: Evidence from Seenku (Mande, Burkina Faso). Diversity in African languages: Selected papers from the 46th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. by Payne, Doris, Pacchiarotti, Sara, and Bosire, Mokaya, 5–21. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.17169/langsci.b121.280.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura, and Heath, Jeffrey. 2016. Phrasal grammatical tone in the Dogon languages: The role of constraint interaction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34. 593–639. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-015-9309-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David, and Bickmore, Lee (eds.) 2014. Africana Linguistica 20. (Special issue on melodic H tone.).Google Scholar
Olawsky, Knut J. 2006. A grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2016. A typology of tone and inflection: A view from the Oto-Manguean languages of Mexico. Tone and inflection: New facts and new perspectives, ed. by Palancar, Enrique L. and Léonard, Jean Léo, 109-39. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary. 2003. Tone specification in Leggbo. Linguistic description: Typology and representation of African languages, ed. by Mugane, John M., 139-50. Trenton: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Patel, Aniruddh D. 2003. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience 6(7). 674-81. DOI: 10.1038/nn1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolle, Nicholas. 2017. A hybrid OT-DM model: Support from a morphological conspiracy in Degema. Handout from a paper presented at the Syntax-Prosody in OT (SPOT) Workshop, University of California, Santa Cruz, November 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas. 2018. Grammatical tone: Typology, theory, and functional load. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation, to appear.Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah. 2017a. Process morphology in a realizational theory. North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 47. 91–104.Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah. 2017b. Distributing morphologically conditioned phonology: Three case studies from Guébie. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah. 2018. Cross-word morphologically conditioned scalar tone shift in Guébie. Morphology. DOI: 10.1007/s11525-018-9327-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sande, Hannah, and Jenks, Peter. 2017. Cophonologies by phase. Handout from paper presented at the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 48, Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Sullivant, John Ryan. 2015. The phonology and inflectional morphology of Cháʔknyá, Tataltepec de Valdés Chatino, a Zapotecan language. Austin: University of Texas, Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Villard, Stéphanie. 2015. The phonology and morphology of Zacatepec Eastern Chatino. Austin: University of Texas, Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Volk, Erez. 2011. Mijikenda tonology. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University dissertation.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1959. Tonemics, morphotonemics, and tonal morphemes. General Linguistics 4. 1–9.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Kay. 1972. Igbo English dictionary. Benin City: Ethiope Publishing.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2019. Verb inflection in the Chatino languages: The separate life cycles of prefixal vs. tonal conjugational classes. Inflectional complexity and verb classes: A view from the Otomanguean languages of Mexico, ed. by Baerman, Matthew, Feist, Timothy, and Palancar, Enrique. Berlin: Language Science Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hyman supplementary material

Hyman supplementary material
Download Hyman supplementary material(File)
File 1.6 MB