Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:16:01.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Richtmyer–Meshkov instability evolution in layered system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

A.N. ALESHIN
Affiliation:
Krzhizhanovsky Power Engineering Institute (ENIN), Leninsky Prospect 19, Moscow GSP-1, 117927 Russia
E.V. LAZAREVA
Affiliation:
Krzhizhanovsky Power Engineering Institute (ENIN), Leninsky Prospect 19, Moscow GSP-1, 117927 Russia
S.V. SERGEEV
Affiliation:
Krzhizhanovsky Power Engineering Institute (ENIN), Leninsky Prospect 19, Moscow GSP-1, 117927 Russia
S.G. ZAYTSEV
Affiliation:
Krzhizhanovsky Power Engineering Institute (ENIN), Leninsky Prospect 19, Moscow GSP-1, 117927 Russia

Abstract

Presently, a great part of the attention paid to the studies on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) is focused on the case of shock passage through a system of gas layers of different densities. The interest to this problem has been induced, in particular, by multiple attempts to minimize the process of mixing between the layers of different densities in targets for inertial confinement fusion (ICF), caused by excitation of the RMI on the layer boundaries. The RMI suppression is one of the most important, but difficult problems in worldwide efforts on ICF. A direct investigation of this phenomenon in laser experiments (in NOVA, for example) is a rather difficult task. Shock tubes are a more promising tool for modeling the impulsively-driven instabilities in gas layers, for they allow us a detailed investigation of the mechanism of initiation and the pathways of evolution of the instability (Jacobs et al. 1995; Aleshin et al. 1995a). A series of shock-tube experiments for the shock passage through a system of gas layers of different densities has been carried out. The effect of a suppression of the RMI has been found. A 2.5-fold reduction of the mixing region thickness in the presence of the layer as compared to the thickness without it has been obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)