Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-23T14:43:28.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simplified model for designing large KrF amplifiers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

J. A. Sullivan
J. A. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simplified model for determining the performance of large krypton-fluoride laser amplifiers is presented. The model includes a straightforward treatment of the controlling kinetics, an exact solution for energy extraction, and an approximation to amplified spontaneous emission losses; it can be easily programmed to run on personal computers. The inclusion of the controlling basic physics for KrF lasers makes the model ideally suited for the many calculations that are necessary to optimize the design of a specific amplifier. The basic parameters determined in the model are compared to experimental data wherever possible, and the large amplifier performance predictions are compared to the results from the most sophisticated kinetics and a 3-D extraction model that includes a full treatment of losses due to amplified spontaneous emission.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 241 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Berger, M.J. & Selzer, S.M. 1964 NASA Report Sp-3012.Google Scholar
Czuchlewski, S.J. et al. 1989 LA–UR–89–2675, Vol. II (Los Alamos National Laboratory).Google Scholar
Edwards, C.B. et al. 1981 Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 843–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, E. et al. 1983 AIP Conf. Proc. 100, 18–25.Google Scholar
Klimek, D.E. et al. 1981 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-17, 1847–1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. et al. 1989 J. Appl. Phys. 65, pp. 4532–4541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, W.T. 1989 LA–UR–89–2675, Vol. 2 (Los Alamos National Laboratory).Google Scholar
Rice, J.K. et al. 1980 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-16, 1315–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M.J. 1983 Appl. Phys. B 30, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spectra, Technology, Inc. Final Report 9-X65-W1478–1.Google Scholar
Suda, A. et al. 1987 Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 218–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J.A. 1990 Los Alamos Internal Memorandum CLS–90–1083.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.C. et al. 1989 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25, pp. 2161–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, K. & Takuma, H. 1988 In International Symposium on Short Wavelength Lasers and Their Applications (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
U.S. DOE 1989 Report DOE/DP-0069.Google Scholar