Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T15:46:06.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Older Burial Disturbance: Postfunerary Manipulation of Graves and Corpses in Precontact Northeastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Ana Solari Open the ORCID record for Ana Solari [Opens in a new window] ,
Sergio F. S. M da Silva ,
Anne Marie Pessis ,
Gabriela Martin  and
Niede Guidon
Ana Solari*
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Arqueologia, Paleontologia e Ambiente do Semiárido do Nordeste do Brasil and Fundação Museu do Homem Americano, São Raimundo Nonato, Brazil
Sergio F. S. M da Silva
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arqueologia–UFPE, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Recife, Brazil
Anne Marie Pessis
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Arqueologia, Paleontologia e Ambiente do Semiárido do Nordeste do Brasil and Fundação Museu do Homem Americano, São Raimundo Nonato, Brazil
Gabriela Martin
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Arqueologia, Paleontologia e Ambiente do Semiárido do Nordeste do Brasil and Fundação Museu do Homem Americano, São Raimundo Nonato, Brazil
Niede Guidon
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Arqueologia, Paleontologia e Ambiente do Semiárido do Nordeste do Brasil and Fundação Museu do Homem Americano, São Raimundo Nonato, Brazil
*
(anasolari74@gmail.com, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At times funerary practices do not end with the deposition of the corpses in their final resting place, because occasionally these supposedly definitive burials are disturbed later. When we can confirm that people were mainly responsible for these disturbances, even when other natural taphonomic factors are present, then we have a situation of anthropic postfunerary manipulation of bodies and graves. Some precontact sites in northeastern Brazil have mortuary contexts with “anomalies” in the deposition of bodies into their graves. Applying a taphonomy-based approach, we analyze these cases and compare them to other burials with similar characteristics from central-eastern Brazil in our discussion of the “alternative” phenomenon of postburial manipulation. The evidence suggests that the anthropic disturbance of older burials and corpses should be understood not as a random event, but as an integral and meaningful part of the mortuary practices of ancient inhabitants from across different regions of Brazil throughout the Holocene. With this work we highlight not only unusual mortuary patterns of precontact human groups in Brazil and South America but also the importance of a taphonomic approach to understanding the complexity and variability of funerary and postfunerary actions.

Às vezes as práticas funerárias não terminam com a deposição dos cadáveres em seu local de descanso final, porque ocasionalmente esses sepultamentos supostamente definitivos são posteriormente perturbados. Quando podemos confirmar que as pessoas foram as principais responsáveis por esses distúrbios, mesmo quando outros fatores tafonômicos naturais estão presentes, então temos uma situação de manipulação antrópica pós-funerária de corpos e sepulturas. Alguns sítios pré-contato no nordeste do Brasil evidenciam contextos mortuários com “anomalias” na deposição dos corpos em suas sepulturas. Aplicando uma abordagem baseada na tafonomia, analisamos esses casos e os comparamos com outros sepultamentos com características semelhantes do centro-leste do Brasil, para discutir o fenômeno “alternativo” da manipulação pós-funerária. As evidências sugerem que a perturbação antrópica de sepultamentos e corpos mais antigos deve ser entendida não como um evento fortuito, mas potencialmente como parte integrante e significativa das práticas mortuárias dos antigos habitantes de diferentes regiões do Brasil durante todo o Holoceno. Com este trabalho, contribuiremos para somar conhecimentos sobre padrões mortuários incomuns de grupos humanos pré-contato no Brasil e na América do Sul. Além disso, destacamos a importância de uma abordagem tafonômica para compreender a complexidade e variabilidade das ações funerárias e pós-funerárias.

Keywords

burial disturbancepostfunerary manipulationarchaeothanatologyfunerary practicesBrazilian archaeologysepultamentos perturbadosmanipulação pós-funeráriaarqueotanatologiapráticas funeráriasarqueologia brasileira
Type
Article
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 824 - 837
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, Bradley J., and Byrd, John E. (editors) 2008 Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains. Humana Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaza, Bernardo, Rivera, Mario A., Schiappacasse, Virgilio, and Wise, Karen 1994 Tipología de las momias chinchorro y evolución de las prácticas de momificación. Chungara 26:11–47.Google Scholar
Aspöck, Edeltraud 2011 Past ‘Disturbances’ of Graves as a Source: Taphonomy and Interpretation of Reopened Early Medieval Inhumation Graves at Brunn am Gebirge and Winnall II. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 30:299–234. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2011.00370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspöck, Edeltraud, Klevnäs, Alison, and Müller-Scheeßel, Nils (editors) 2020 Grave Disturbances: The Archaeology of Post-Depositional Interactions with the Dead. Oxbow, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berón, Mónica, and Luna, Leandro 2007 Modalidades de entierro en el sitio Chenque I: Diversidad y complejidad de los patrones mortuorios de los cazadores-recolectores pampeanos. In Arqueología en las Pampas, edited by Bayón, Cristina, González, Isabel, Flegenheimer, Nora, Pupio, Alejandra, and Frère, Magdalena, pp. 129–142. Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Botella, Miguel C., Alemán, Inmaculada, and Jiménez, Sylvia A. 2000 Los huesos humanos: manipulación y alteraciones. Ediciones Bellaterra, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Cauwe, Nicolas 2001 Skeletons in Motion, Ancestors in Action: Early Mesolithic Collective Tombs in Southern Belgium. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 11:147–163. DOI:10.1017/S0959774301000087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Della C., and Mendonça de Souza, Sheila M. F. 2012 Tocas do Gongo, São Raimundo Nonato, Piauí, Brasil: Uma bioarqueologia retrospectiva. Revista de Arqueologia SAB 24(2):30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crangle, Jennifer N. 2016 A Study of Post-Depositional Funerary Practices in Medieval England. PhD dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Cunha, Eugénia 2014 Análise antropológica de 15 esqueletos da região do Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara. In Os biomas e as sociedades humanas na pré-história da região do Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara, Brasil, Vol. IIA, edited by Pessis, Anne-Marie, Martin, Gabriela, and Guidon, Niede, pp. 318–379. FUMDHAM, Sao Raimundo Nonato, Brazil.Google Scholar
Dillehay, Tom D. (editor) 1995 Tombs for the Living: Andean Mortuary Practices. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Duday, Henry 2009 The Archaeology of the Dead: Lectures in Archaeothanatology. Studies in Funerary Archaeology 3. Oxbow, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, William N. 2005 Understanding Veneration and Violation in the Archaeological Record. In Interacting with the Dead: Perspectives on Mortuary Archaeology for the New Millennium, edited by Rakita, Gordon F. M., Buikstra, Jane E., Beck, Lane A., and Williams, Sloan R., pp. 207–227. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Fahlander, Fredrik 2010 Messing with the Dead: Post-Depositional Manipulations of Burials and Bodies in the South Scandinavian Stone Age. Documenta Praehistorica 37:22–32. DOI:10.4312/dp.37.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahlander, Fredrik 2016 The Materiality of the Ancient Dead: Post-Burial Practices and Ontologies of Death in Southern Sweden AD 800–1200. Current Swedish Archaeology 24:137–162.Google Scholar
Fahlander, Fredrik 2018 Grave Encounters: Ontological and Material Aspects of Post-Burial Practices in South Scandinavian Late Iron Age. Primitive Tider 20:51–63. DOI:10.5617/pt.6631.Google Scholar
Fahlander, Fredrik, and Oestigaard, Terje (editors) 2008 The Materiality of Death: Bodies, Burials, Beliefs. Archaeopress, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleize, Yves 2020 Disturbance of Early Medieval Graves in Southwestern Gaul: Taphonomy, Burial Reopening and the Reuse of Graves. In Grave Disturbances: The Archaeology of Post-Depositional Interactions with the Dead, edited by Aspöck, Edeltraud, Klevnäs, Alison, and Müller-Scheeßel, Nils, pp. 115–135. Oxbow, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gligor, Mihai (editor) 2014 Archaeothanatology: An Interdisciplinary Approach on Death from Prehistory to Middle Ages. Editura Mega, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.Google Scholar
Guidon, Niede, and da Luz, Fátima 2009 Sepultamentos na Toca do Enoque (Serra das Confusões–Piauí) Nota prévia. Fumdhamentos 8:115–123.Google Scholar
Guidon, Niede, Pessis, Anne-Marie, and Martin, Gabriela 2009 Pesquisas arqueológicas na região do Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara e seu entorno (Piauí, 1998–2008). Fumdhamentos 8:1–61.Google Scholar
Guidon, Niede, Vergne, Cleonice, and Vidal, Irma A. 1998 Sítio Toca da Baixa dos Caboclos: um abrigo funerário do enclave arqueológico do Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara. Clio–Série Arqueológica 13:127–138.Google Scholar
Hoernes, Matthias, Heitz, Christian, and Laimer, Manuele 2019 Revisiting the Dead: Tomb Reuse and Post-Burial Practices at Ascoli Satriano (Pre-Roman Apulia, Seventh–Fourth Century BC). Cambridge Archaeological Journal 29:261–285. DOI:10.1017/S0959774318000537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knüsel, Christopher, and Robb, John 2016 Funerary Taphonomy: An Overview of Goals and Methods. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10:655–673. DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.031.Google Scholar
Maranca, Silvia 1976 A Toca do Gongo I: Abrigo com sepultamentos no estado do Piauí. Revista do Museu Paulista 23:155–173.Google Scholar
Maranca, Silvia 1987 Agricultores ceramistas da área de Säo Raimundo Nonato. Clio–Série Arqueológica 4:95–97.Google Scholar
Martin, Gabriela 1992 La antigüedad del hombre en el Nordeste de Brasil. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia da Universidade de São Paulo 2:7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Gabriela 1994 Os rituais funerários na Pré-História do Nordeste. Clio–Série Arqueológica 10:29–46.Google Scholar
Martin, Gabriela 2008 Pré-história do Nordeste do Brasil. Editora Universitária da UFPE, Recife, Brazil.Google Scholar
Martínez, Gustavo, Flensborg, Gustavo, and Bayala, Pablo D. 2012 Human Corpse Manipulation and the Body as Symbol: A Case Study from the Eastern Pampa–Patagonia Transition (Argentina) during the Final Late Holocene. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31:215–226. DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2011.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendonça de Souza, Sheila M. F., Vidal, Irma A., Oliveira, Claudia, and Vergne, Cleonice 2002 Mumificação natural na Toca da Baixa dos Caboclos, sudeste do Piauí: Uma interpretação integrada dos dados. Canindé 2:83–102.Google Scholar
Millaire, Jean-François 2004 The Manipulation of Human Remains in Moche Society: Delayed Burials, Grave Reopening, and Secondary Offerings of Human Bones on the Peruvian North Coast. Latin American Antiquity 15:371–388. DOI:10.2307/4141584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naji, Stepha, Camille Becdeliévre, Sélim Djouad, Henri Duday, Aurelié André, and Rottier, Stéphane 2014 Recovery Methods for Cremated Commingled Remains: Analysis and Interpretation of Small Fragments Using a Bioarchaeological Approach. In Commingled Human Remains: Methods in Recovery, Analysis, and Identification, edited by Adams, Bradley J. and Byrd, John E., pp. 33–56. Elsevier, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, Walter A., Hubbe, Mark, and Araujo, Astolfo G. M. 2002 A Late-Paleoindian Secondary Burial from Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Current Research in the Pleistocene 19:83–85.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, Liv, and Larsson, Lars 2016 Disturbing the Dead: Archaeothanatological Analysis of the Stone Age Burials at Zveijnieki, Latvia (Excavated 2006–2009). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10:715–724. DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.034.Google Scholar
Pessis, Anne Marie 1992 Identidade e classificação dos registros gráficos pré-históricos do nordeste do Brasil. Clio–Série Arqueológica 8:35–68.Google Scholar
Pessis, Anne Marie, Martin, Gabriela, and Guidon, Niede (editors) 2014 Os biomas e as sociedades humanas na pré-história da região do Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara, Brasil, Vol. IIB. FUMDHAM, Piaui, Brazil.Google Scholar
Prous, André 1992–1993 As estruturas aparentes: os sepultamentos do Grande Abrigo de Santana do Riacho. Os sepultamentos da escavação no 1. Arquivos do Museu de História Natural da UFMG 13–14:21–77.Google Scholar
Prous, André, and Schlobach, Monica C. 1997 Sepultamentos pré-históricos do Vale do Peruaçu–MG. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia 7:3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roksandic, Mirjana 2002 Position of Skeletal Remains as a Key to Understanding Mortuary Behavior. In Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspectives, edited by Haglund, William D. and Sorg, Marcella H., pp. 99–117. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Santoro, Calogero M., Standen, Vivien G., Arriaza, Bernardo T., and Dillehay, Tom D. 2005 Archaic Funerary Pattern or Postdepositional Alteration? The Patapatane Burial in the Highlands of South Central Andes. Latin American Antiquity 16:329–346. DOI:10.2307/30042497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christopher W., and Symes, Steven A. (editors) 2008 The Analysis of Burned Human Remains. Elsevier Academic, San Diego.Google Scholar
Sofaer, Joanna R. 2006 The Body as Material Culture—A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solari, Ana, da Silva, Sérgio F. S. M., Pessis, Anne Marie, Martin, Gabriela, and Guidon, Niede 2020 Applying the Bioarchaeology of Care Model to a Severely Diseased Infant from the Middle Holocene, North-Eastern Brazil: A Step Further into Research on Past Health-Related Caregiving. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 30:482–491. DOI:10.1002/oa.2876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solari, Ana, Pessis, Anne Marie, Martin, Gabriela, Barbosa, Fatima, and da Silva, Sérgio F. S. Monteiro 2020 Las termitas como agentes naturales de alteraciones tafonómicas postdepositacionales en un esqueleto humano del sitio arqueológico Toca do Enoque (Piauí, Brasil). Revista Argentina de Antropología Biológica 22:1–10. DOI:10.24215/18536387e016.Google Scholar
Solari, Ana, Pessis, Anne Marie, Martin, Gabriela, and Guidon, Niede 2018 Funerary Practices at the Toca do Gongo III Site during the Late Holocene in Serra da Capivara (Piauí, Brazil). Bioarchaeology International 2:165–181. DOI:10.5744/bi.2018.1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solari, Ana, Pessis, Anne Marie, Martin, Gabriela, and Guidon, Niede 2020 An Archaeothanatological Approach for Interpreting a Complex Funerary Deposit: The Case-Study of "Burial 2" at Toca do Enoque (Middle Holocene, Northeastern Brazil). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 12:Article 223. DOI:10.1007/s12520-020-01180-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, André 2010 As práticas mortuárias dos caçadores-coletores pré-históricos da região de Lagoa Santa (MG): um estudo de caso do sítio arqueológico ‘Lapa do Santo.’ Master's thesis, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, André 2016 Os padrões de sepultamento do sítio arqueológico Lapa do Santo (Holoceno Inicial, Brasil). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 11:243–276. DOI:10.1590/1981.81222016000100013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, André, Elias Oliveira, Rodrigo, Villagran, Ximena S., Bernardo, Danilo V., C. Salazar-García, Domingo, Bissaro, Marcos César Jr., Pugliese, Francisco, et al. 2016 Early Holocene Ritual Complexity in South America: The Archaeological Record of Lapa Do Santo (East-Central Brazil). Antiquity 90:1454–1473. DOI:10.15184/aqy.2016.220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, André, Oliveira, Rodrigo Elias, Bernardo, Danilo V., Salazar-García, Domingo C., Talamo, Sahra, Jaouen, Klervia, Hubbe, Mark, et al. 2015 The Oldest Case of Decapitation in the New World (Lapa do Santo, East-Central Brazil). PLoS ONE 10:e0137456. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0137456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, Douglas H. 2002 Approaches to the Study of Commingling in Human Skeletal Biology. In Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspectives, edited by Haglund, William D. and Sorg, Marcella H., pp. 331–351. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra 2010 Introduction: Relics and Remains. Past & Present 206(5):9–36. DOI:10.1093/pastj/gtq026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss-Krejci, Estella 2011 The Formation of Mortuary Deposits: Implications for Understanding Mortuary Behavior of Past Populations. In Social Bioarchaeology, edited by Agarwal, Sabrina C. and Glencross, Bonnie A., pp. 68–106. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss-Krejci, Estella 2020 Disturbance of Graves among the Ancient Maya. In Grave Disturbances, edited by Aspöck, Edeltraud, Klevnäs, Alison, and Müller-Scheeßel, Nils, pp. 207–224. Oxbow, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielo, Alessia 2018 After-Death Manipulation: The Treatment of the Skull in Precontact Funeral Contexts. Global Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology 6:2–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar