Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:12:07.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering the Ocampo Caves and the Era of Incipient Cultivation in Mesoamerica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bruce D. Smith
Bruce D. Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In northeastern Mexico, near Ocampo, Romero’s and Valenzuela’s caves have been central to explanations of agricultural origins in Mesoamerica for more than four decades. Along with caves in Tehuacán and Oaxaca, these "Ocampo caves" have provided almost all of the available evidence for the initial appearance of a number of key Mesoamerican crop plants, including maize, beans, and squash. This article reanalyzes the cultural and temporal context of five crop plant assemblages in the Ocampo caves: maize (Zea mays), bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), and three species of squash (Cucurbita argyrosperma, C. moschata, C. pepo). Fifteen AMS radiocarbon dates on early domesticates both confirm the stratigraphic integrity of the two caves and substantially revise the temporal framework for initial appearance of core domesticates in northeastern Mexico, showing the transition to food production in Tamaulipas took place more recently than previously thought. A substantially foreshortened chronology for Ocampo crop plants confirms the northern periphery role of Tamaulipas in the origins of agriculture in Mexico, while also underscoring the need for establishing AMS-based archaeobotanical sequences across Mesoamerica to gain an adequate context for understanding the temporal, environmental, and cultural contexts of initial plant domestication in the region.

Situadas cerca de Ocampo, Tamaulipas, en el noreste de México, las cuevas de Romero y Valenzuela fueron las más importantes para abordar las explicaciones sobre los orígenes de la agricultura en Mesoamérica por más de cuatro décadas. Junto con las cuevas de San Marcos y Coxcatlán en Tehuacán y la cueva de Guilá Naquitz en Oaxaca, estas "cuevas de Ocampo" han proporcionado casi toda la evidencia disponible desde el comienzo de la domesticación de numerosas plantas, incluyendo maíz, frijol y calabaza. Este artículo reanaliza las dimensiones culturales y temporales de cinco plantas de cosecha de las cuevas de Ocampo: maíz (Zea mays), calabaza vinatera (Lagenaria siceraria), y tres especias de calabaza (Cucurbita argyrosperma, C. moschata, C. pepo). Quince fechas de radiocarbono obtenidas por acelerdor de los cultígenos confirman la integridad estrategráfica de las dos cuevas, y revisa considerablemente la dimensión temporal de la aparición inicial de las principales plantas domésticas en noreste México. La transición hacia la producción de alimentos en Tamaulipas demuestra que este proceso se presentó en tiempos más recientes de lo que se pensaba. Inicialmente presentada en la cronología de Ocampo desde 9000 a.P., por exemplo, Lagenaria siceraria y Cucurbita pepo no aparecen en la ocupación de las cuevas hasta 4400-4000 a.C. (fechas calibradas). Cucurbita argyrosperma está presente desde 3000 a.C. (fechas calibradas), el maíz desde 2400 a.C. (fechas calibradas), y la Cucurbita moschata desde 800 a.C. (fechas calibradas). Esta cronología recortada de plantas de Ocampo confirma el papel que tuvo la periferia norte de Tamaulipas en el origen de la agricultura en México, al mismo tiempo que subraya la necesidad de establecer bases de secuencias arqueobotánicas fechadas por acelerador en toda Mesoamérica, para entender suficientemente el contexto temporal, medioambiental y cultural de la domesticación inicial de la región.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 342 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Benz, B. F., and Iltis, H. 1990 Studies in Archaeological Maize 1: The “Wild” Maize from San Marcos Cave Reexamined. American Antiquity 55:500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess-Terrel, M. 1979 A Study of Cucurbita Material from Salmon Ruin, New Mexico . Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Eastern New Mexico University, Portales.Google Scholar
Callen, E. O. 1963 Diet as Revealed by Coprolites. In Science in Archaeology, edited by D. Brothwell and E. Higgs, pp. 186–194. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B. 1958 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates II. Science 127:1098–1105.Google Scholar
Cutler, H. C., and Whitaker, T. W. 1961 History and Distribution of the Cultivated Cucurbits in the Americas. American Antiquity 26:469–485.Google Scholar
Cutler, H. C., and Whitaker, T. W. 1967 Cucurbits from the Tehuacán Caves. In Environment and Subsistence, edited by D. Byers, pp. 212–219. The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol. I. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Decker, D. 1984 Squash Seeds from NAN Ranch, New Mexico. Manuscript on file, Archaeobiology Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Decker, D. 1986 A Biosystematic Study of Cucurbita pepo. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Decker-Walters, D., Walters, T. W., Cowan, C. W., and Smith, B. D. 1993 Isozymic Characterization of Wild Populations of Cucurbita pepo . Journal of Ethnobiology 13:55–72.Google Scholar
Doebley, J. 1990 Molecular Evidence and the Evolution of Maize. Economic Botany 44:6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1968 Archaeological Systems Theory and Early Mesoamerica. In Anthropological Archaeology in the Americas, edited by B. J. Meggers, pp. 67–87. Anthropological Society of Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1973 The Origins of Agriculture. Annual Review of Anthropology 2:271–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1986 Guilá Naquitz, Archaic Foraging and Early Agriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V., and Ford, R. I. 1972 A Productivity Study of Teosinte (Zea mexicana), November 22–25, 1971. Manuscript on file, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ford, R. I. 1986 Reanalysis of Cucurbits in the Ethnobotanical Laboratory, University of Michigan. The Missouri Archaeologist 47:13–31.Google Scholar
Fritz, G. 1994a Are the First American Farmers Getting Younger? Current Anthropology 35:305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, G. 1994b Reply [to Piperno]. Current Anthropology 35:639–643.Google Scholar
Fritz, G. 1994c Precolumbian Cucurbita argyrosperma ssp.argyrosperma (Cucurbitaceae) in the Eastern Woodlands of North America. Economic Botany 48:280–292.Google Scholar
Gepts, P. 1990 Biochemical Evidence Bearing on the Domestication of Phaseolus (Fabaceae) Beans. Economic Botany 44:28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowlett, J. 1987 The Archaeology of Radiocarbon Accelerator Dating. Journal of World Prehistory 2:127–170.Google Scholar
Gremillion, K., and Sobolik, K. 1996 Dietary Variability among Prehistoric Forager-Farmers of Eastern North America. Current Anthropology 37:529–539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, K. 1996 The Preceramic Sequence from the Tehuacán Valley: A Reevaluation. Current Anthropology 37:700–716.Google Scholar
Johnson, F., and MacNeish, R. S. 1972 Chronometric Dating. In Chronology and Irrigation, edited by F. Johnson, pp. 3–55. The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol. IV. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1967 Archaeological Phaseolus from Tehuacán. In Environment and Subsistence, edited by D. Byers, pp. 201–211. The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol. I. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1993 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Dates and the Antiquity of Phaseolus Cultivation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Economic Botany, Miami.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1995 Phaseolus Beans, Accelerator Dates in the Americas. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L., and MacNeish, R. S. 1960 Prehistoric Bean Remains from Caves in the Ocampo Region of Tamaulipas, Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets 19:33–56. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. 1954a Valenzuela’s Cave (Tm c 248). Report (29 pages) on file, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. 1954b Description of Squares Dug in Tm c 248, March 1954. Notes (52 pages, typewritten) on file, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
King, F. B. 1985 Early Cultivated Cucurbits in Eastern North America. In Prehistoric Food Production in North America, edited by R. I. Ford, pp. 73–79. Anthropological Papers No. 75. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Long, A., Benz, B. F., Donahue, J., Jull, A., and Toolin, L. 1989 First Direct AMS Dates on Early Maize from Tehuacán. Radiocarbon 31:1035–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1954a Romero’s Cave. Report (69 pages) on file, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1954b Excavation Notes 1953–1954 Tm c 247 [Romero’s cave]. Notes (27 pages) on file, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1954c Catalog of Excavated Material from Romero’s Cave (Tm c 247) Municipio de Ocampo, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Catalog (153 pages, typewritten) on file, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1958 Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Transactions, vol. 48, part 6. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1959 Origin and Spread of Some Domesticated Plants as Seen from Tamaulipas, Mexico. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1967 A Summary of the Subsistence. In Environment and Subsistence, edited by D. Byers, pp. 290–309. The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol. I. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1972 The Evolution of Community Patterns in the Tehuacán Valley of Mexico and Speculations about the Cultural Processes. In Man, Settlement, and Urbanism, edited by P. J. Ucko, R. Tringham, and G. W. Dimbleby, pp. 67–93. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1991 The Origins of Agriculture and Settled Life. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S., and Flannery, K. V. 1997 In Defense of the Tehuacán Project. Current Anthropology 38:660–672.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S., and Galinat, W. 1956 Archaeological Evidence on the Diffusion and Evolution of Maize in Northeastern Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets 17:125–150. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S., and Galinat, W. 1967a Prehistoric Maize, Teosinte, and Tripsacum from Tamaulipas, Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets 22:33–63. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S., and Galinat, W. 1967b Prehistoric Wild and Cultivated Maize. In Environment and Subsistence, edited by D. Byers, pp. 178–200. The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol. I. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S., and Willey, G. R. 1964 Origins of Agriculture in Middle America. In Natural Environment and Early Cultures, edited by R. C. West, pp. 427–445. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. I. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Merrick, L. 1989 Systematics, Evolution, and Ethnobotany of a Domesticated Squash, Its Wild Relatives and Allied Species in the Genus Cucurbita. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Merrick, L. 1990 Systematics and Evolution of a Domesticated Squash, Cucurbita argyrosperma, and Its Wild and Weedy Relatives. In Biology and Utilization of the Cucurbitaceae, edited by D. Bates, R. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, pp. 77–95. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Merrick, L., and Bates, D. M. 1989 Classification and Nomenclature of Cucurbita argyrosperma . Baileya 23:94–102.Google Scholar
McClung de Tapia, E. 1992 The Origins of Agriculture in Mesoamerica and Central America. In The Origins of Agriculture, edited by C. W. Cowan and P. J. Watson, pp. 143–172. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
McClung de Tapia, E. 1994 Las primeras sociedades sedentarias. In El México antigo, sus áreas culturales, los orígenes y el horizonte Preclásico, edited by L. Manzanilla and L. López Lujon, pp. 209–246. Historia Antigua de México, vol. I. INAH-UNAM, Porrua, México.Google Scholar
Nee, M. 1990 The Domestication of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae). Economic Botany 44:56–68.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D., and Piperno, D. 1990 Antiquity of Maize Cultivation in Ecuador: Summary and Reevaluation of the Evidence. American Antiquity 55:324–337.Google Scholar
Piperno, D. 1994 On the Emergence of Agriculture in the New World. Current Anthropology 35:637–639.Google Scholar
Riley, T. J., Walz, G. R., Bareis, C. J., Forier, A. C., and Parker, K. E. 1994 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) Dates Confirm Early Zea mays in the Mississippi River Valley. American Antiquity 59:490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. M. 1995 Cucurbita ssp. and Lagenaria siceraria . In Laboratory Guide to Archaeological Plant Remains from Eastern North America. Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Rovner, I. 1996 Review of Current Research in Phytolith Analysis: Applications in Archaeology and Paleoecology , edited by D. Pearsall and D. Piperno. American Antiquity 61:430–431.Google Scholar
Schiegl, S., Lev-Yadum, S., Bar-Yosef, O., El Goresy, A., and Weiner, S. 1994 Siliceous Aggregates from Prehistoric Wood Ash: A Major Component of Sediments in Kebara and Hayonim Caves (Israel). Israel Journal of Earth Sciences 43:267–278 Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. 1992 Rivers of Change. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. 1995a The Origins of Agriculture in the Americas. Evolutionary Anthropology 3:174–184.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. 1995b The Emergence of Agriculture. Scientific American Library. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. 1997 The Initial Domestication of Cucurbita pepo in the Americas 10,000 Years Ago. Science 276:932–934.Google Scholar
Steward, J. H. 1949 Cultural Causality and Law: A Trial Formulation of the Development of Early Civilizations. American Anthropologist 51:1–27.Google Scholar
Weiner, S., Schiegl, S., Goldberg, P., and Bar-Yosef, O. 1995 Mineral Assemblages in Kerara and Hayonim Caves, Israel: Excavation Strategies, Bone Preservation, and Wood Ash Remains. Israel Journal of Chemistry 35:143–154.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. C. 1981 Archaeological Cucurbits. Economic Botany 35:460–466.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., and Cutler, H. C. 1965 Cucurbits and Culture in the Americas. Economic Botany 19:344–349 Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., and Cutler, H. C. 1986 Cucurbits from Preceramic Levels at Guilá Naquitz. In Guilá Naquitz, edited by K. V. Flannery, pp. 275–279. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., Cutler, H. C., and MacNeish, R. S. 1957 Cucurbit Materials from Three Caves Near Ocampo, Tamaulipas. American Antiquity 22:352–358.Google Scholar
Wills, W. H. 1995 Archaic Foraging and the Beginning of Food Production in the American Southwest. In Last Hunters—First Farmers, edited by T. D. Price and A. B. Gebauer, pp. 215–243. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar