Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:37:08.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description and Method of Exploitation of the Alca Obsidian Source, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Justin Jennings  and
Michael D. Glascock
Justin Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Michael D. Glascock
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Santa Barbara, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite three decades of obsidian studies in the Andes, the extraction zones for this raw material remain poorly understood. The extent and geology of the sources, their intra-source chemical compositional variation, and the means by which the sources were exploited prehistorically, have largely escaped study. This report describes the results of a geoarchaeological survey of the Alca obsidian source in the Cotahuasi Valley, Peru. The survey documented 16 discrete outcrops of obsidian across an area of 50 km2. The obsidian in these outcrops can be found both as volcaniclastic flows and nodules in poorly consolidated volcanic tuff. Neutron activation analyses on samples from these outcrops suggest that all obsidian came from the same parent magma. Five small quarries were found during the course of the survey. No evidence of control over the resource zone was found and we suggest that tight control over obsidian extraction in the valley would have been logistically difficult due to the size and nature of the deposits.

A pesar de tres décadas de estudios de la obsidiana en los Andes, las zonas de extracción de esta materia prima son todavía pocas conocidas. Tanto los límites y la naturaleza geológica de los fuentes, como su variabilidad química y los métodos de explotación prehistóricos son temas que requieren investigación. En este informe se presentan los resultados de un reconocimiento geoarqueológico de la fuente de obsidiana Alca, en el Valle Cotahuasi, Arequipa, Perú. El reconocimiento registró 16 afloramientos de obsidiana dentro de un área de 50 km2. La obsidiana encontrada en estos afloramientos se caracteríza como flujos volcaniclásticos y nódulos en tuff volcánico poco consolidado. Análysis de activación neutrónico llevado a cabo con muestras provenientes de dichos afloramientos indican que todos pertencen a la misma magma. Identificamos cinco canteras pequeñas a través del reconocimiento, sin embargo, no encontramos evidencias que sugieren control sobre los recursos. Proponemos que dado la distribución, tamaño, y naturaleza de los depósitos de obsidiana, el control o administración de su explotación hubiera sido demasiado caro y dificil.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 107 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aldenderfer, Mark S. 1998 Montane Foragers: Asana and the South-Central Andean Archaic. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jeanne 1990 Lithic Resource Control and Economic Change in the Santa Barbara Channel Region. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 12:158–177.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E., and Glascock, Michael D. 1998 Interpreting Intra-Source Variation in the Composition of Obsidian: The Geoarchaeology of San Martin Jilotepeque, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity 9:353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Sarah O. 1998 Prehistoric Agricultural Terraces in the Rio Japo Basin, Colca Valley, Peru. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sarah O., Glascock, Michael D., and Giesso, Martín 1997 Source of Volcanic Glass for Ancient Andean Tools. Nature 386 (April 3):449–450.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Asaro, Frank 1977 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from the Andes: New Perspectives on Pre-Hispanic Interaction in Peru and Bolivia. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-6343, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Asaro, Frank 1978 Obsidian Distribution and Provenience in the Central Highlands and Coast of Peru during the Preceramic Period. Contribution of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 36:61–83.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Asaro, Frank 1979 Anásis de rasgos significativos en la obsidiana de los Andes Centrales. Revista del Museo Nacional 43:281–326.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Asaro, Frank 1993 La distribución y procedencia de artefactos de obsidiana durante el período initial y horizonte temprano. In Emergencia de la civilización en los Andes: ensayos de la interpretación, by Richard L. Burger, pp. 189–231. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., Asaro, Frank, Salas, Guido, and Stross, Fred 1998a The Chivay Obsidian Source and the Geological Origin of Titicaca Basin Type Obsidian Artifacts. Andean Past 5:203–223.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., Asaro, Frank, Trawick, Paul, and Stross, Fred 1998b The Alca Obsidian Source: The Origin of Raw Material of Cusco Type Obsidian. Andean Past 5:185–202.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., Mohr Chávez, Karen L., and Chávez, Sergio J. 2000 Through the Glass Darkly: Prehispanic Obsidian Procurement and Exchange in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia Journal of World Prehistory 14:267–362.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Glascock, Michael D. 2000a Locating the Quispisisa Obsidian Source in the Department of Ayacucho, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 11:258–268.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Glascock, Michael D. 2000b The Puzolana Obsidian Source: Locating the Geologic Source of Ayacucho Type Obsidian. Andean Past 6:289–308.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard. L., Schreiber, Katharina J., Glascock, Michael D., and Huamaní, José Ccencho 1998c The Jampatilla Obsidian Source: Identifying the Geologic Source of Pampas Type Obsidian Artifacts from Southern Peru. Andean Past 5:225–239.Google Scholar
Canchaya, A., Aranda, A., and Guevara, T. 1995 Mapa metalogénico del Perú. Instituto Geológico Minero y Metalúrgico, Lima, Perú.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H. 1969 On the Identification of Pre-Hispanic Obsidian Mines in Southern Hidalgo. American Antiquity 34:176–177.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1979 A Specialized Obsidian Quarry at Otumba, Mexico: Implications for the Study of Mesoamerican technology and trade. Lithic Technology 8:46–49.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1986 From Mountains to Molehills: A Critical Review of Teotihuacan’s Obsidian Industry. In Economic Aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico, edited by Barry L. Isaac, pp. 23–74. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 2. JAI Press, Greenwich.Google Scholar
Cruz Antillón, Rafael 1994 Análisis arqueológico del yacimiento de obsidiana de la sierra de Las Navajas, Hidalgo. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Ericson, Jonathon E., and Prudy, Barbara A. (editors) 1984 Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ford, Anabel, Stross, Fred, Asaro, Frank, and Michel, Helen. V. 1997 Obsidian Procurement and Distribution in the Tikal-Yaxha Intersite Area of the Central Maya Lowlands. Ancient Mesoamerica 8:101–110.Google Scholar
Frye, Kirk L., Aldenderfer, Mark, and Glascock, Michael D. 1998 The Aconcahua Obsidian Source and its Relation to South Central Andean Exchange Systems. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Andean Meetings, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D. 1994 New World Obsidian: Recent Investigations. In Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian Sites and Artifacts, Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium of Archaeometry, edited by D. A. Scott and Paul Myers, pp. 113–134. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D., Braswell, Geoffrey E., and Cobean, Robert H. 1998 A Systematic Approach to Obsidian Source Characterization. In Archaeological Obsidian Studies, edited by M. Steven Shackley, pp. 15–65. Advances in Archaeological and Museum Science, Volume 3. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D., Neff, Hector, Stryker, Katherine S., and Johnson, Taryn N. 1994 Sourcing Archaeological Obsidian by an Abbreviated-NAA Procedure. Journal of Radianalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 180:29–35.Google Scholar
Healan, Dan M. 1997 Pre-Hispanic Quarrying in the Ucareo-Zinapecuaro Obsidian Source Area. Ancient Mesoamerica 8:77–100.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert Fleming, Williams, Howell, and Graham, John A. 1965 Notes on Mesoamerican Obsidians and Their Significance in Archaeological Studies. Contribution of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 1:94–103.Google Scholar
Hyslop, John 1984 The Inka Road System. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Julien, Catherine J. 1991 Condesuyo: The Political Division of Territory under Inka and Spanish Rule. Bonner Amerikanistische Studien 19, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Neira, Maximo A. 1968 Un nuevo complejo litico y pintura rupestre el la Grata Su-3 de Sumbay. Revista de la Facultad de Letras 5, Uni-versidad Nacional de San Agustín, Arequipa, Perú.Google Scholar
Olchauski, E., and Dávila, David 1994 Geología de los cuadrángulos de Chuquibamba y Cotahuasi. Boletín 50, Instituto Geológico Minero y Metalúrgico, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Pastrana, Alejandro 1998 La explotación Azteca de la obsidiana en la sierra de las Navajas. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Pérez Vera, Victor 1997 El cañón de Cotahuasi es el mas profundo del mundo. Solimana, Revista Turística Cultural, May Issue, pp. 31. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Arequipa, Perú.Google Scholar
Sandweiss, Daniel H., Mclnnis, Heather, Burger, Richard L., Cano, Asunción, Ojeda, Bernardio, Paredes, Rolando, del Carmen Sandweiss, María, and Glascock, Michael D. 1998 Quebrada Jaguay: Early South American Maritime Adaptations. Science 281:1830–1832.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S., Kerley, Janet M., and Kneebone, Ronald R. 1986 Obsidian Working, Long-Distance Exchange, and Politico-Economic Organization of Early States in Central Mexico. In Economic Aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico, edited by Barry L. Isaac, pp. 101–132. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 2. JAI Press, Greenwich.Google Scholar
Shaw, Ian 1994 Pharonic Quarrying and Mining: Settlement and Procurement in Egypt’s Marginal Regions. Antiquity 68:108–119.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael W. 1981 Obsidian Production and the State of Teotihuacan. American Antiquity 46:769–788.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael W., and Parsons, Jeffery R. 1967 Prehispanic Obsidian Mines in Southern Hidalgo. American Antiquity 32:542–543.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael W., and Parsons, Jeffery R. 1972 Prehispanic Obsidian Exploitation in Central Mexico: a Preliminary Synthesis. In Miscellaneous studies in Mexican prehistory, by Michael W. Spence, Jeffrey R. Parsons, and Mary Hrones Parsons, pp. 1–43. Anthropological Papers 45, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin 1986 Production and Exchange of Stone Tools: Prehistoric Obsidian in the Aegean. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Trawick, Paul 1994 The Struggle for Water in the Andes: A Study of Technological Change and Social Decline in the Cotahuasi Valley of Peru. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Yale University.Google Scholar
Weigand, Philip C. 1982 Mining and Mineral Trade in Prehispanic Zacatecas. Anthropology Stony Brook 6: 87–134.Google Scholar
Weigand, Philip C., and Spence, Michael W. 1982 Obsidian mining complex at La Joya, Jalisco. Anthropology Stony Brook 6: 175–188.Google Scholar
Werner, Louis 2000 Stones for the Emperors: Purple Porphyry Carved from Egypt Surrounded Roman Royalty. Discovering Archaeology 2(3):32–29.Google Scholar
Zapata Llano, José 1904 Memorias histórico-físico-apologéticas de la América meridional. Imprenta de San Pedro, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar