Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:11:29.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE LOST HALF OF ANDEAN ARCHITECTURE: EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ROOFING TRADITIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL USE AT CHINCHERO, PERU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Stella Nair
Affiliation:
Department of Art History, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Sonia Archila
Affiliation:
Departmento de Antropología, Universidad de los Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
Christine A. Hastorf*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
*
(hastorf@berkeley.edu, corresponding author)

Abstract

This paper examines an eighteenth-century roof in Chinchero, Peru to show the critical role played by roofs in Andean communities across time. Roofs can reveal identity constructions, continuation of traditions, adaptations to new influences, and relationships to local environments and the sacred. We present a discussion of the importance of roofs in architectural history, the critical role played by roofs in Inca architecture, and a description of the colonial period roof in Chinchero, along with its facture, dates of construction, botanical identification, and the environmental zones from where these items could have been gathered.

En este artículo se analiza un techo del siglo dieciocho en Chinchero, Perú, con el objetivo de mostrar la importancia que tuvieron los techos en las comunidades andinas a lo largo del tiempo. Los techos revelan construcciones de identidad, continuidad de tradiciones, adaptaciones a nuevas influencias y relaciones con los ambientes locales y con lo sagrado. Presentamos aquí una discusión sobre la importancia de los techos para la historia de la arquitectura y el papel fundamental que estos desempeñaron en la arquitectura Inca. Asimismo, describimos el techo del periodo colonial en Chinchero y discutimos su fabricación, fechas de construcción, identificación botánica de los materiales y las zonas ambientales donde estos elementos podrían haberse obtenido.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Abercrombie, Thomas Alan 1998 Pathways of Memory and Power: Ethnography and History among an Andean People. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Agurto Calvo, Santiago 1987 Estudios acerca de la construcción arquitectura y planeamiento incas. Cámara Peruana de la Construccion, Lima.Google Scholar
Arnold, Denise Y. 1991 The House of Earth-bricks and Inka-stones: Gender, Memory, and Cosmos in Qaqachaka. Journal of Latin American Lore 17:369.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brian S., Silva, Miriam A., and Burr, George S. 2012 The Destruction of the Yurac Rumi Shrine (Vilcabamba, Cusco Department). Andean Past 10 (1):195211.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brian S., Cruz, Javier Fonseca Santa, and Silva, Miriam Aráoz 2015 Vilcabamba and the Archaeology of Inca Resistance. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press Monographs. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Jean-François 1983 Contribution à l'étude de l'architecture inca: établissements de la vallée du Rio Vilcanota-Urubamba. Cahiers d'archéologie et d'ethnologie d'Amérique du Sud. Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme, Paris.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hsing-Chen, and Shih, Chih-Ming 2008 Reinterpreting Traditional Chinese Archtecture in the Office Building and Skyscraper: the Architecture of C.Y. Lee. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 25 (3 [Autumn]):181202.Google Scholar
Franquemont, Christine Robinson 1988 Chinchero Plant Categories: An Andean Logic of Observation. PhD dissertation, Anthropology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Franquemont, Christine Robinson 1990 The Ethnobotony of Chinchero: An Andean Community in Southern Peru. Fieldiana Botany. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gasparini, Graziano, and Margolies, Luise 1977 Arquitectura Inka. Centro de Investigaciones Históricas y Estéticas Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Marilyn Y. 1983 Greek Temples and Chinese Roofs. American Journal of Archaeology 87 (3):305310.Google Scholar
Gose, Peter 1991 House Rethatching in an Andean Annual Cylce: Practice, Meaning, and Contradiction. American Ethnologist 18 (1):3966.Google Scholar
Gould, M. H. 2001 A Historical Perspective on the Belfast Truss Roof. Constructon History 17:7587.Google Scholar
Guo, Qinghua 2005 TImber Building Structures in Chosen Korea: A Case Study on Geunjeongjeon and Injeongjeon. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 22 (1 [Spring]):5168.Google Scholar
Hogg, Alan G., Hua, Quan, Blackwell, Paul G., Niu, Mu, Buck, Caitlin E., Guilderson, Thomas P., Heaton, Timothy J., Palmer, Jonathan G., Reimer, Paula J., Reimer, Ron W., Turney, Christian S. M., and Zimmerman, Susan R. H. 2013 SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere Calibration, 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55 (4):18891903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamari, Pirjo 2017 The Roofscapes of Petra: The Use of Ceramic Roof Tiles in a Nabataean-Roman Urban Context. In Forms of Dwelling: 20 Years of Taskscapes in Archaeology, edited by Rajala, Ulla, and Mills, Philip, pp. 85113. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holzer, Stefan 2008 Structural Iron Elements in German Timber Roofs (1600–1800). Constructon History 23:3357.Google Scholar
InsideWood 2004– onwards. Published on the Internet. http://insidewood.lib.ncsu.edu/search, accessed October 4, 2017.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeonghyun, and Jeon, BongHee 2012 The Myth of the Roof Shape in Korean Architecture. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 24 (1):66.Google Scholar
Lee, Vincent R. 1988 The Lost Half of Inca Architecture. Sixpac Manco Publications, Wilson, Wyoming.Google Scholar
Leinaweaver, Jessa 2009 Raising the Roof in the Transational Andes: Building Houses, Forging Kinship. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (4):777796.Google Scholar
Maki, Fumihiko 1988 The Roof at Fujisawa. Perspecta 24:106121.Google Scholar
Mayer, Enrique 1977 Beyond the Nuclear Family. In Andaen Kinship and Marriage, edited by Bolton, Ralph and Mayer, Enrique, pp. 6080. American Anthropological Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Nair, Stella 2003 Of Remembering and Forgetting: The Architecture of Chinchero, Peru from Thupa 'Inka to the Spanish Occupation. PhD dissertation, Architecture, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nair, Stella 2015 At Home with the Sapa Inca: Architecture, Space, and Legacy at Chinchero. 1st ed. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Nath, R. 1987 Kharprel Roof and Chhappar Ceiling: Folk Elements in Mughal Architecture (Fatehpur Sikri, A.D. 1572–1585). Archives in Asian Art 40:6973.Google Scholar
Niles, Susan 1999 The Shape of Inca History. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Pommer, Richard 1983 The Flat Roof: A Modernist Controversy in Germany. Art Journal 43 (2):158169.Google Scholar
Pulgar Vidal, Javier 1946 Historia y Geografía del Perú. University of San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Regateiro, Francisco 2014 The Architecture and Construction Processes of the Vernacular Shikili Houses in Gilan, Northern, Iran. Constructon History 29 (2):6382.Google Scholar
Squier, Ephraim George 1877 Peru: Incidents of Travel and Exploration in the Land of the Incas. Macmillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman 2011 The Sixth Century in East Asian Architecture. Ars Orientalis 41:2771.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E.A. 2011 InsideWood — A Web Resource for Hardwood Anatomy. IAWA Journal 32 (2):199211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, David 1986 Inigo Jones's Roof Structures. Architectural History 29:85101.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 1

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 1(Image)
Image 213.6 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 2

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 2(Image)
Image 61.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 3

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 3(Image)
Image 12.9 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 4

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 4(Image)
Image 173.6 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 5

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 5(Image)
Image 1 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 6

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 6(Image)
Image 724.5 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 7

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 7(Image)
Image 783.7 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 8

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 8(Image)
Image 196.1 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 9

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 9(Image)
Image 520.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Nair et al. supplementary material 10

Supplementary Figure

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 10(Image)
Image 547.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nair et al. supplementary material 11

Nair et al. supplementary material

Download Nair et al. supplementary material 11(File)
File 14 KB