Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-qr8hc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-20T14:43:56.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modes of Extraction in Latin America’s Lithium Triangle: Explaining Negotiated, Unnegotiated, and Aborted Mining Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2022

Lucas I. González Open the ORCID record for Lucas I. González [Opens in a new window]  and
Richard Snyder Open the ORCID record for Richard Snyder [Opens in a new window]
Lucas I. González
Affiliation:
Lucas I. González is a researcher at the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), the Universidad Católica Argentina, and the Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Argentina. lgonzalez@unsam.edu.ar; lucas_gonzalez@uca.edu.ar.
Richard Snyder
Affiliation:
Richard Snyder is a professor of political science at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Richard_Snyder@brown.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mitigating climate change requires a global transition from fossil fuels to a “green economy” driven by renewable energies. This shift has fostered massive investments in mining resources, notably lithium in South America, needed to store renewable energies. These mining ventures often produce harmful externalities where lithium is located. In Argentina, a major producer, striking variation has occurred in the fortunes of lithium-mining projects. In some instances, mining companies offered concessions that mitigated environmental damage and improved local socioeconomic conditions. In others, companies made minimal concessions, and in a third set they halted projects in response to local resistance. Why do mining ventures result alternatively in negotiated, unnegotiated, or aborted extraction? The article proposes a new typology of modes of extraction together with a multilevel explanatory framework that centers on the strengths and strategies of transnational mining companies, subnational governments, and local communities in setting the terms for extracting lithium.

Keywords

Lithiumgreen economytransnational mining companiessubnational politicslocal indigenous communitiesfederalism

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 47 - 73
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: Lucas González and Richard Snyder declare none.

References

Amengual, Matthew. 2018. Buying Stability: The Distributive Outcomes of Private Politics in the Bolivian Mining Industry. World Development 104: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragón, Fernando, and Pablo Rud, Juan. 2009. The Blessing of Natural Resources: Evidence from a Peruvian Gold Mine. Working Paper Series 15. Lima: Banco Central del Perú.Google Scholar
Aranda, Darío. Litio: denuncia contra una minera en Antofagasta de la Sierra. Página 12, March 23.Google Scholar
Arce, Moisés. 2014. Resource Extraction and Protest in Peru. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano-Yanguas, Javier. 2011. Aggravating the Resource Curse: Decentralisation, Mining and Conflict in Peru. Journal of Development Studies 47, 4: 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano-Yanguas, Javier. 2016. Extractive Industries and Regional Development: Lessons from Peru on the Limitations of Fiscal Transfers to Producing Regions. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Argento, Melisa, and Puente, Florencia. 2019. Entre el boom del litio y la defensa de la vida. Salares, agua, territorios y comunidades en la región atacameña. In El litio en Sudamérica: geopolítica, energía y territorios, ed. Bruno Fornillo. Buenos Aires: El Colectivo. 173–220.Google Scholar
Argento, Melisa, and Puente, Florencia. 2021. 7 hipótesis sobre las dinámicas territoriales y el litio en Argentina. In Salares andinos: ecología de saberes por la protección de nuestros salares y humedales. Observatorio Plurinacional de Salares Andinos. San Pedro de Atacama: Fundación Tanti.Google Scholar
Argento, Melisa, and Zícari, Julián. 2017. Las disputas por el litio en la Argentina: ¿materia prima, recurso estratégico o bien común? Prácticas de Oficio 1, 19: 36–48.Google Scholar
Argento, Melisa, and Zícari, Julián. 2018. Políticas públicas y conflictos territoriales en torno a la explotación del litio en Salta: el caso de salinas grandes. Andes, Antropología e Historia 1, 29: 1–36.Google Scholar
Ascher, William. 2007. Issues and Best Practices in the Decentralization of Natural Resource Control in Developing Countries. In Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices, ed. Shabbir Cheema, G. and Dennis, A. Rondinelli. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Giles, and Hamilton, Kirk. 2003. Savings, Growth and the Resource Curse Hypothesis. World Development 31, 11: 1793–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beblawi, Hazem, and Luciani, Giacomo. 1987. The Rentier State: Nation, State, and Integration in the Arab World. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bjorvatn, Kjetil, Reza Farzanegan, Mohammad, and Schneider, Friedrich. 2012. Resource Curse and Power Balance: Evidence from Oil-Rich Countries. World Development 40, 7: 1308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschini, Anne, Pettersson, Jan, and Roine, Jesper. 2013. The Resource Curse and Its Potential Reversal. World Development 43: 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnschweiler, Christa Noel. 2008. Cursing the Blessings? Natural Resource Abundance, Institutions, and Economic Growth. World Development 36, 3: 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Francesco, and Michaels, Guy. 2013. Do Oil Windfalls Improve Living Standards? Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5, 1: 208–38.Google Scholar
Christel, Lucas. 2015. Resistencias sociales y legislaciones mineras en las provincias argentinas: los casos de Mendoza, Córdoba, Catamarca y San Juan (2003–2009). Ph.D. diss., Escuela de Política y Gobierno, Universidad Nacional de San Martín.Google Scholar
Comunidades Indígenas de las Salinas Grandes y Laguna de Guyatayoc. 2015. Kachi Yupi. Protocolo biocultural comunitario de Argentina. Comunidades de las Salinas Grandes y Laguna de Guayatayoc. Quera y Aguas Calientes.Google Scholar
Conciencia Minera. 2019. Sales de Jujuy rindió culto a la Pachamama. http://www.concienciaminera.com.ar/2019/08/sales-de-jujuy-rindio-culto-a-la-pachamama/ Google Scholar
Díaz-Rioseco, Diego. 2016. Blessing and Curse: Oil and Subnational Politics in the Argentine Provinces. Comparative Political Studies 49, 14: 1930–64.Google Scholar
Dupont, Francis. 2019. Social License to Operate Remains the Biggest Risk for Mining Companies in 2020. Blog post. Borealis. https://www.boreal-is.com/blog/social-licence-to-operate Google Scholar
El Ancasti. 2018. El litio está ¿y CAMYEN? January 29.Google Scholar
Flores, Clemente. 2017. Entre el litio y la vida: comunidades originarias y la lucha por la conservación del agua y de su cultura. In Informe ambiental 2017. Buenos Aires: Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (FARN).Google Scholar
Fornillo, Bruno. 2015. Geopolítica del litio, industria, ciencia y energía en Argentina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO/El Colectivo.Google Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina, Moncada, Eduardo, and Snyder, Richard. 2019. Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Ellis, Wibbels, Erik, and Mvukiyehe, Eric. 2008. Lessons from Strange Cases: Democracy, Development, and the Resource Curse in the US States. Comparative Political Studies 41, 4–5: 477–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Lucas. 2018. Oil Rents and Patronage: The Fiscal Effects of Oil Booms in the Argentine Provinces. Comparative Politics 51, 1: 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Lucas, and Lodola, Germán. 2019. The Impact of Oil Rents on Subnational Development: Evidence from Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development 54, 4: 550–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylfason, Thorvaldur, Herbertsson, Tryggvi, and Zoega, Gylfi. 1999. A Mixed Blessing: Natural Resources and Economic Growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 3, 2: 204–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, Paul Alexander, and Ary Tanimoune, Nasser. 2016. The Determinants of Social Conflict in the Latin American Mining Sector: New Evidence with Quantitative Data. World Development 78: 401–19.Google Scholar
Jaskoski, Maiah. 2022. The Politics of Extraction: Territorial Rights, Participatory Institutions, and Conflict in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics. International Social Science Journal 51, 159: 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Peter, Ora Szekely, Mia Bloom, Fotini, Christia, et al. 2021. COVID-19 and Fieldwork: Challenges and Solutions. PS: Political Science & Politics 54, 2: 264–69.Google Scholar
Larsen, Erling. 2006. Escaping the Resource Curse and the Dutch Disease? When and Why Norway Caught Up With and Forged Ahead of Its Neighbors. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 65, 3: 605–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederman, Daniel, and Maloney, William. 2008. In Search of the Missing Resource Curse [with Comments]. Economía 9, 1: 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Andrés, Obaya, Martín, and Pascuini, Paulo. 2018. Las oportunidades del litio: más allá de la batería. Alquimias Económicas, December. https://alquimiaseconomicas.com/2018/12/18/las-oportunidades-del-litio-mas-alla-de-la-bateria/ Google Scholar
Luong, Pauline Jones, and Weinthal, Erika. 2012. Oil is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in Soviet Successor States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahdavy, Hossein. 1970. Patterns and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran. In Studies in Economic History of the Middle East: From the Rise of Islam to the Present Day, ed. Cook, M. A.. London: Oxford University Press. 37–61.Google Scholar
Marchegiani, Pía, Höglund Hellgren, Jasmín, and Gómez, Leandro. 2019a. Lithium Extraction in Argentina: A Case Study on the Social and Environmental Impacts. Buenos Aires: FARN.Google Scholar
Marchegiani, Pia, Morgera, Elisa, and Parks, Louisa. 2019b. Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Natural Resources in Argentina: The Challenges of Impact Assessment, Consent and Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Cases of Lithium Mining. International Journal of Human Rights 24, 2–3: 224–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennial Lithium. 2018. Cauchari East Lithium Project. https://www.millenniallithium.com/projects/cauchari-east-lithium-project Google Scholar
Ministerio de Energía y Minería. 2017. Situación actual y perspectivas. Informe especial. Buenos Aires: Presidencia de la Nación. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/marzo_2017_-_informe_especial_litio_.pdf Google Scholar
Mitchell, Paul. 2021. Top 10 Business Risks and Opportunities for Mining and Metals in 2022. EY Global Mining & Metals. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/mining-metals/10-business-risks-facing-mining-and-metals Google Scholar
Monteiro, Joana, and Ferraz, Claudio. 2012. Learning to Select: Resource Windfalls and Political Accountability in Brazil. Mimeograph. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
Bravo, Montenegro, Carlos, Juan. 2018. El modelo de industrialización del litio en Bolivia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 10, 34: 69–82.Google Scholar
Northern Miner. 2011. Taca Taca Gets Bigger and Better. December 9. https://www.northernminer.com/news/taca-taca-gets-bigger-and-better/1000750981/ Google Scholar
Obaya, Martín, López, Andrés, and Pascuini, Paulo. 2021. Curb Your Enthusiasm: Challenges to the Development of Lithium-Based Linkages in Argentina. Resources Policy 70, 2 (March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC). 2020. Lithium Carbonates. Trade data. ∼’https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/lithium-carbonates?redirect=true#:∼:text=Lithium%20carbonates%20are%20the%20world’s,and%20Germany%20(%2446.2M Google Scholar
Orihuela, José Carlos. 2013. How do “Mineral-States” Learn? Path-dependence, Networks, and Policy Change in the Development of Economic Institutions. World Development 43, C: 138–48.Google Scholar
Orihuela, José Carlos. 2017. Institutions and Place: Bringing Context Back into the Study of the Resource Curse. Journal of Institutional Economics 14, 1: 157–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orihuela, José Carlos, Pérez Cavero, Carlos, and Contreras, Cesar. 2022. Extractivism of the Poor: Natural Resource Commodification and Its Discontents. The Extractive Industries and Society 9 (March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orocobre Limited. 2019. Video corporativo. 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGYQbpMU99I. Accessed July 15, 2021.Google Scholar
Orocobre Limited. ND. Case Study: Community Infrastructure. https://www.orocobre.com/wp/?mdocs-file=7295 Google Scholar
Postali, Fernando, and Slaibe, Antonio. 2009. Petroleum Royalties and Regional Development in Brazil: The Economic Growth of Recipient Towns. Resources Policy 34, 4: 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pragier, Deborah. 2019. Comunidades indígenas frente a la explotación de litio en sus territorios: contextos similares, respuestas distintas. Polis 52: 1–20.Google Scholar
Pressly, Linda. 2019. Litio: la fiebre del “oro blanco”, ¿fortuna o infortunio para Argentina? BBC Mundo Noticias. October 20. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-50082466.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Pucara Pueblos Catamarqueños en Resistencia y Autodeterminación. 2020. Otra Vez Cerda: ¿Ineptitud O Desidia? March 10. https://www.facebook.com/AGUAPUCARA/photos/a.729170167251072/1477195965781818/?type=3&eid=ARAmUreO-K06cbTbfaKMGw_ttXl2H4JEZToQXNdraxJFKcR6WIkYpMr0uwYqmIoEH53n60_OSFXnhp4b.Google Scholar
Puente, Florencia, and Argento, Melisa. 2015. Conflictos territoriales y construcción identitaria en los salares del noroeste argentino. In Fornillo 2015. 123–66.Google Scholar
Riofrancos, Thea. 2022. The Security-Sustainability Nexus: Lithium Onshoring in the Global North. Global Environmental Politics. doi https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael 2012. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Sabrina. 2019. Communities Challenge Lithium Production in Argentina. Diálogo Chino, March 12. https://dialogochino.net/en/extractive-industries/24733-communities-challenge-lithium-production-in-argentina Google Scholar
Slipak, Ariel. 2015. La extracción del litio en la Argentina y el debate sobre la “riqueza natural.” In Fornillo 2015. 91–122.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2006. Does Lootable Wealth Breed Disorder? A Political Economy of Extraction Framework. Comparative Political Studies 39, 8: 943–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard, and Bhavnani, Ravi. 2005. Diamonds, Blood, and Taxes: A Revenue-Centered Framework for Explaining Political Order. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49, 4: 563–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, Ashley, Yunis, Jairo, and Aliakbari, Elmira. 2020. Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies 2019. Canada: Fraser Institute. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/annual-survey-of-mining-companies-2019 Google Scholar
Torvik, Ragnar. 2001. Learning by Doing and the Dutch Disease. European Economic Review 45, 2: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Geological Survey. 2022. Mineral Commodity Summaries. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, Frederick. 2011. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? Journal of Economic Literature 49, 2: 366–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Mariana, and Wagner, Lucrecia. 2021. Mining Struggles in Argentina: The Keys of a Successful Story of Mobilisation. The Extractive Industries and Society 8, 4: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

González and Snyder supplementary material

González and Snyder supplementary material

Download González and Snyder supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 20.8 MB