Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T11:14:49.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Donors, New Goals? Altruism, Self-Interest, and Domestic Political Support in Development Cooperation in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2021

Gino Pauselli Open the ORCID record for Gino Pauselli [Opens in a new window]
Gino Pauselli*
Affiliation:
Gino Pauselli is a doctoral candidate in political science at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. pauselli@sas.upenn.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on aid allocation shows that many factors influence donors’ decision to provide aid. However, our knowledge about foreign aid allocation is based on traditional foreign aid, from developed to developing countries, and many assumptions of these theories do not hold when applied to southern donors. This article argues that south-south development cooperation (SSDC) can be explained by the strength of development cooperation’s domestic allies and foes. Specifically, it identifies civil society organizations as allies of SSDC and nationalist groups as opponents of SSDC. By using for the first time data on SSDC activities in Latin America, this article shows the predictive strength of a liberal domestic politics approach in comparison to the predictive power of alternative explanations. The results speak to scholars of both traditional foreign aid and south-south development cooperation in highlighting the limits of traditional theories of foreign aid motivations.

Keywords

South-south cooperationforeign aidforeign policydomestic politicscivil societyLatin America
Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 45 - 73
Copyright
© The Author 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: I have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

Abdenur, Adriana. 2017. What Can South-South Development Cooperation Do for International Peace? Brazil’s Role in Haiti and Guinea-Bissau. International Negotiation 22: 451–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agencia Chilena de Cooperación Internacional al Desarrollo (AGCID). 2019. Informe cuenta pública 2018. https://www.agci.cl/cpublica/docs/cuenta_publica_2018.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2020.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and David, Dollar. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5, 1: 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allendoerfer, Michelle G. 2017. Who Cares About Human Rights? Public Opinion About Human Rights Foreign Policy. Journal of Human Rights 16, 4: 428–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angeles, Luis, and Kyriakos, Neanidis. 2009. Aid Effectiveness: The Role of the Local Elite. Journal of Development Economics 90, 1: 120–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apodaca, Clair. 2006 . Understanding U.S. Human Rights Policy: A Paradoxical Legacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appe, Susan. 2018. Directions in a Post-Aid World? South-South Development Cooperation and CSOs in Latin America. Voluntas 29, 2: 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Michael, Anton, Strezhnev, and Erik, Voeten. 2017. Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, 2: 430–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David. 1966. Analytical Notes on Foreign Aid and Politics. Background 10, 1: 66–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamaschi, Isaline, and Arlene, Tickner. 2017. Introduction: South-South Cooperation Beyond the Myths: A Critical Analysis. In South-South Cooperation Beyond the Myths: Rising Donors, New Aid Practices? ed. Bergamaschi, Phoebe Moore, and Tickner. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 1–28.Google Scholar
Bergamaschi, Isaline, Arlene, Tickner, and Jimena, Durán. 2017. Going South to Reach the North? The Case of Colombia. In South-South Cooperation Beyond the Myths: Rising Donors, New Aid Practices? ed. Bergamaschi, Phoebe Moore, and Tickner. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 245–70.Google Scholar
Besherati, Neissan A., and Steve, MacFeely. 2019. Defining and Quantifying South-South Cooperation. UNCTAD Research Paper no. 30. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZPHuLJk_m1lOERh_EtUK-FRNTsA52lgWo/view. Accessed May 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Boone, Peter. 1996. Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid. European Economic Review 40, 2: 289–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschini, Anne, and Olofsgard, Anders. 2007. Foreign Aid: An Instrument for Fighting Communism? Journal of Development Studies 43, 4: 622–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazys, Samuel R. 2013. Evidencing Donor Heterogeneity in Aid for Trade. Review of International Political Economy 20, 4: 947–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bry, Sandra. 2017. Brazil’s Soft-Power Strategy: The Political Aspirations of South-South Development Cooperation. Foreign Policy Analysis 13, 2: 297–316.Google Scholar
Bueno, de Mesquita, Bruce, , and Alastair, Smith. 2009. A Political Economy of Aid. International Organization 63, 2: 309–40.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Miró, Gisela. 2019. Cooperación trilateral Sur-Sur al desarrollo: por una descolonización de la sociedad. Revista CIDOB dAfers Internacional 120, 1: 147–70.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, John, Gerring, et al. 2019. V-Dem Codebook v9. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/archive/previous-reference-materials/reference-materials-v9/ Google Scholar
Costa, Leite, Iara, Melissa Pomeroy, and Bianca, Suyama. 2015. Brazilian South-South Development Cooperation: The Case of the Ministry of Social Development in Africa. Journal of International Development 27, 8: 1446–61.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Simone. 2016. Donor Political Economies and the Pursuit of Aid Effectiveness. International Organization 70, 1: 65–102.Google Scholar
Dolcetti, Marcolini, Michele, . 2014. La participación de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en la cooperación Sur-Sur de Brasil: buscando un enfoque integral de participación. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo 3, 2: 130–47.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel, and Andreas, Fuchs. 2015. Rogue Aid? An Empirical Analysis of China’s Aid Allocation. Canadian Journal of Economics 48, 3: 988–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Peter, Nunnenkamp, and Rainer, Thiele. 2008. Does US Aid Buy UN General Assembly Votes? A Disaggregated Analysis. Public Choice 136: 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Peter, Nunnenkamp, and Rainer, Thiele. 2011. Are “New” Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between Non-DAC Donor Countries. World Development 39, 11: 1950–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte-Herrera, Lisbeth, and José, Pedraza-Beleño. 2018. La relación política exterior y cooperación internacional para el desarrollo: el caso de Colombia, 2002–2015. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios del Desarrollo 7, 2: 4–30.Google Scholar
Easterly, William. 2006 . The White Man ’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Easterly, William, and Tobias, Pfutze. 2009. Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, 2: 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follér, Maj-Lis. 2010. Civil Society Organizations and Brazilian South-South AIDS Cooperation. Global South 4, 1: 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Andreas, and Marina, Rudyak. 2019. The Motives of China’s Foreign Aid. In Handbook on the International Political Economy of China, ed. Zeng, Ka. UK: Edward Elgar. Chapter 23.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Andreas, and Vadlamannati, Krishna C.. 2012. The Needy Donor: An Empirical Analysis of India’s Aid Motives. University of Heidelberg Department of Economics, Discussion Paper no. 532. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 2140949. Accessed May 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Andreas, Axel, Dreher, and Peter, Nunnenkamp. 2014. Determinants of Donor Generosity: A Survey of the Aid Budget Literature. World Development 56, 3: 172–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Tobias. 2013. When Is Foreign Aid Selfish, When Is It Selfless? Journal of Politics 75, 2: 422–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Tobias, Yoshiharu, Kobayashi, and Leah, Long. 2018. Voters Get What They Want (When They Pay Attention): Human Rights, Policy Benefits, and Foreign Aid. International Studies Quarterly 62, 1: 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Cristina, and Alcides, Costa Vaz. 2012. Brazil as “Southern Donor”: Beyond Hierarchy and National Interests in Development Cooperation? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25, 3: 507–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Alejandra, and Gino, Pauselli. 2017. South-South Cooperation and the Governance of Development Aid in South America. In Handbook of South American Governance, ed. Riggirozzi, Pia and Wylde, Christopher. London: Routledge. 191-203.Google Scholar
Kim, In Song. 2017. Political Cleavages Within Industry: Firm-Level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization. American Political Science Review 111, 1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konary, Bahgat. 1984. Foreign Policy in the Third World: An Introduction. International Political Science Review 5, 1: 7–20.Google Scholar
Kuziemko, Ilyana, and Eric, Werker. 2006. How Much is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations. Journal of Political Economy 114, 5: 905–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Carol. 2006. Foreign Aid.: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Fernanda G., and Moraes, Mario C. B.. 2018. Política externa brasileira, cooperação sulsul e educação superior: o caso do programa estudante-convenio de graduação. Educação e Sociedade 39, 143: 343–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsdaine, David. 1993 . Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lundsgaarde, Erik. 2013. The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lundsgaarde, Erik, Christian, Breunig, and Aseem, Prakash. 2007. Trade Versus Aid: Donor Generosity in an Era of Globalization. Policy Sciences 40, 2: 157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen, and Dustin, Tingley. 2010. The Political Economy of U.S. Foreign Aid: American Legislators and the Domestic Politics of Aid. Economics and Politics 22, 2: 200–32.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen, and Dustin, Tingley. 2013. Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay. International Interactions 39, 3: 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morasso, Carla. 2015. La cooperación Sur-Sur argentina con Africa Subsahariana en materia agrícola. Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional de Rosario.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1962. A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. American Political Science Review 56, 2: 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Paul. 1985. The Political Economy of Foreign Aid: A Model of the Market for a Public Good. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33, 2: 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2003. Is Respect for Human Rights Rewarded? An Analysis of Bilateral and Multilateral Aid Allocation Before and After the End of the Cold War. Human Rights Quarterly 25, 2: 510–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2005. Is the Allocation of Food Aid Free from Donor Interest Bias? Journal of Development Studies 41, 3: 394–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2003. Glossary of Statistical Terms. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=6022.Google Scholar
Osgood, Iain. 2017. The Breakdown of Industrial Opposition to Trade: Firms, Product Variety, and Reciprocal Liberalization. World Politics 69, 1: 184–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauselli, Gino. 2019. Foreign Aid’s Motivations: Theoretical Arguments and Empirical Evidence. In Aid Power and Politics, ed. Olivié, Iliana and Pérez, Aitor. London: Routledge. 34–50.Google Scholar
Pérez Gaete, Catalina. 2020. Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en el contexto de la Cooperación Sur-Sur chilena: las potencialidades de una asociación estratégica para el desarrollo. Oasis 31, 123–4.Google Scholar
Quadir, Fahimul. 2013. Rising Donors and the New Narrative of “South-South” Cooperation: What Prospects for Changing the Landscape of Development Assistance. Third World Quarterly 34, 2: 321–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade. American Political Science Review 81, 4: 1121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Round, Jeffery I., and Matthew, Odedokum. 2004. Aid Effort and Its Determinants. International Review of Economics and Finance 13, 3: 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santander, Guillermo, and Alonso, José A.. 2018. Perceptions, Identities and Interests in South-South Cooperation: The Cases of Chile, Venezuela and Brazil. Third World Quarterly 39, 10: 1923–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scartascini, Carlos, Cesi, Cruz, and Philip, Keefer. 2018. Database of Political Institutions 2017 (DP12017). IDB-DT-4. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schraeder, Peter J., Steven, Hook, and Bruce, Taylor. 1998. Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows. World Politics 50, 2: 294–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoones, Ian, Kojo, Amanor, Arilson, Favareto, and Gubo, Qi. 2016. A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture. World Development 81, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semrau, Finn, and Rainer, Thiele. 2017. Brazil’s Development Cooperation: Following in China and India’s Footsteps? Journal of International Development 29, 3: 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankland, Alex, and Euclides, Gonçalves. 2016. Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA. World Development 81: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009 . Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law and Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Ninna. 2018. Diffusing Gender Equality Norms in the Midst of a Feminicide Pandemic: The Case of AMEXCID and Decentralized Mexican South-South Cooperation. Progress in Development 18, 2: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinnett, Douglas M., Jaroslav, Tir, Philip, Schafer, Diehl, Paul F., and Charles, Gochman. 2002. The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science 19, 2: 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Krisztina, and Balázs, Szent-Iványi. 2019. While the Cat’s Away, Will the Mice Play? Government-NGO Relations and the Politics of Aid in Hungary. In Aid Power and Politics, ed. Olivié, Iliana and Pérez, Aitor. London: Routledge. 149–64.Google Scholar
Tassara, Carlo. 2015. La política exterior de Colombia, la OCDE y la revisión entre pares de las políticas públicas. Revista Internacional de Cooperación y Desarrollo 2, 2: 69–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teegen, Hildy, Jonathan, Doh, and Sushil, Vachani. 2004. The Importance of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in Global Governance and Value Creation: An International Business Research Agenda. Journal of International Business Studies 35, 463–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thérien, Jean-Philippe, and Alain, Nöel. 2000. Political Parties and Foreign Aid. American Political Science Review 94, 1: 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Rainer, Peter, Nunnenkamp, and Axel, Dreher. 2007. Do Donors Target Aid in Line with the Millennium Development Goals? A Sector Perspective of Aid Allocation. Review of World Economics 143, 4: 596–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2016. Development Impact Group. Scaling-Up South-South Cooperation for Sustainable Development. New York: UNDP. www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/development-impact/SS%20Research%20Publications/11960%20-%20Design%20for%20Scaling-up%20South-South%20Cooperation%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20-%2009-3_Web.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2020.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). 2015. International Financial System and Development. Report of the Secretary-General. Report A/70/311. https://undocs.org/A/70/311. Accessed May 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, Maurits. 2011. Ideas, Interests and Foreign Aid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Westhuizen, Janis, and Carlos, Milani. 2019. Development Cooperation, the International-Domestic Nexus and the Graduation Dilemma: Comparing South Africa and Brazil. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32, 1: 22^2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva, Ulfgard, Rebecka, and Lorena López. 2017. In Search of Making a Difference: Mexico in the OECD International Development Co-Operation Architecture. Development Policy Review 35, 2: 287–302.Google Scholar
Wang, T. Y. 1999. US Foreign Aid and UN Voting: An Analysis of Important Issues. International Studies Quarterly 43, 1: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alex. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1973. Foreign Aid and United Nations Votes: A Comparative Study. American Political Science Review 67, 3 : 868–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xalma, Cristina. 2007. Informe de la cooperación en Iberoamérica. In Estudios SEGIB n. 2. Madrid: Secretaría General Iberoamericana. https://www.segib.org/wp-content/uplo-ads/librocastellanocompleto.pdf Google Scholar