Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-5tm97 Total loading time: 0.229 Render date: 2021-08-02T07:21:31.851Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Democratic Values, Religiosity, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michelle L. Dion
Affiliation:
McMaster University. dionm@mcmaster.ca
Jordi Díez
Affiliation:
University of Guelph. jdiez@uoguelph.ca
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Latin America has been at the forefront of the expansion of rights for same-sex couples. Proponents of same-sex marriage frame the issue as related to human rights and democratic deepening; opponents emphasize morality tied to religious values. Elite framing shapes public opinion when frames resonate with individuals’ values and the frame source is deemed credible. Using surveys in 18 Latin American countries in 2010 and 2012, this article demonstrates that democratic values are associated with support for same-sex marriage while religiosity reduces support, particularly among strong democrats. The tension between democratic and religious values is particularly salient for women, people who live outside the capital city, and people who came of age during or before democratization.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2017

References

Adamczyk, Amy, and Pitt, Cassady. 2009. Shaping Attitudes About Homosexuality: The Role of Religion and Cultural Context. Social Science Research 38, 2: 33851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AmericasBarometer. 2010. Nashville: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), Vanderbilt University. www.LapopSurveys.org.Google Scholar
AmericasBarometer. 2012. Nashville: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), Vanderbilt University. www.LapopSurveys.org.Google Scholar
Andersen, Robert, and Fetner, Tina. 2008a. Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly 72, 2: 31130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Robert, and Fetner, Tina. 2008b. Economic Inequality and Intolerance: Attitudes Toward Homosexuality in 35 Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 52, 4: 94258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Denise L., Heckathorn, Douglas D. and Maser, Steven M.. 1994. Rational Rhetoric in Politics: The Debate Over Ratifying the U.S. Constitution. Rationality and Society 6, 4: 489518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip M., and Brzezinska, Olga. 2015. Caught in a Web: The Internet and Deterritorialization of LGBT Activism. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Lesbian and Gay Activism, ed. Tremblay, Manon and Paternotte, David. Burlington: Ashgate. 22542.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Bolker, Ben, Maechler, Martin, Walker, and , Steven. 2014. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4 (version 1.1–7). R package. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Baunach, Dawn M. 2011. Decomposing Trends in Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage, 1988–2006. Social Science Quarterly 92, 2: 34663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baunach, Dawn M. 2012. Changing Same-Sex Marriage Attitudes in America from 1988 Through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 2: 36478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B. 2012. Determinants of Public Support for Same-Sex Marriage: Generational Cohorts, Social Contact, and Shifting Attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24, 4: 52433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B. 2014. Employment Discrimination, Local School Boards, and LGBT Civil Rights: Reviewing 25 Years of Public Opinion Data. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26, 3: 34254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B., and Scheufele, Dietram A.. 2009. Moral Politicking: Public Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage in an Election Context. International Journal of Press/Politics 14, 2: 186211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Amy B., and Scheufele, Dietram A.. 2011. New Voters, New Outlook? Predispositions, Social Networks, and the Changing Politics of Gay Civil Rights. Social Science Quarterly 92, 2: 32445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, Mary. 1997. Celebration and Supression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement. American Journal of Sociology 103, 3: 53165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, John. 2005. Broadening the Family of God: Debating Same-Sex Marriage and Queer Families in America. Theology and Sexuality 12, 1: 6380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. 2003a. Values, Political Knowledge, and Public Opinion About Gay Rights: A Framing-Based Account. Public Opinion Quarterly 67, 2: 173201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. 2003b. The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion About Gay Rights. Journal of Politics 65, 4: 120820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions. Public Opinion Quarterly 69, 4: 599616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R., and Gross, Kimberly. 2005. Values, Framing, and Citizens' Thoughts About Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity. Political Psychology 26, 6: 92948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, Héctor. 2002. The Night Is Young: Sexuality in Mexico in the Time of AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis. 1993. How People Think, Reason, and Feel About Rights and Liberties. American Journal of Political Science 37, 3: 86799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdova, Abby, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2009. Economic Crisis and Democracy in Latin America. PS: Political Science & Politics 42, 4: 67378.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2015. LGBT Rights and Representation in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Influence of Structure, Movements, Institutions, and Culture. Report. Chapel Hill: LGBT Representation and Rights Initiative at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. https://globalstudies.unc.edu/files/2015/04/LGBT_Report_LatAm_v8-copy.pdf.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert Alan. 1973. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Díez, Jordi. 2013. Explaining Policy Outcomes: The Adoption of Same-Sex Unions in Buenos Aires and Mexico City. Comparative Political Studies 46, 2: 21235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díez, Jordi. 2015. The Politics of Gay Marriage in Latin America: Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001a. Evaluating Framing Effects. Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 1: 91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001b. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? Journal of Politics 63, 4: 104166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2011. Latin America's Gay Rights Revolution. Journal of Democracy 22, 2: 10418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2013. International Influence, Domestic Activism, and Gay Rights in Argentina. Political Science Quarterly 128, 4: 687716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Juan J., and Lutter, Mark. 2013. Supranational Cultural Norms, Domestic Value Orientations and the Diffusion of Same-Sex Union Rights in Europe, 1988–2009. International Sociology 28, 1: 10220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and Mara-Drita, Iona. 1996. How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union. American Journal of Sociology 102, 1: 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Andrew R. 2014. Reexamining Context and Same-Sex Marriage: The Effect of Demography on Public Support for Same-Sex Relationship Recognition. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26, 3: 283300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Andrew R. 2015. Examining Variation in Surveying Attitudes on Same-Sex Marriage: A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 79, 2: 58093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John. 2003. Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software 8, 15: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth Jay. 2012. Constructing “The Same Rights With the Same Names”: The Impact of Spanish Norm Diffusion on Marriage Equality in Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society 54, 4 (Winter): 2959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Matthew C. 1996. The Meanings of Macho: Being a Man in Mexico City. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Joslyn, Mark R.. 2008. Beliefs About the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory. Public Opinion Quarterly 72, 2: 291310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Gary R., and Lee, Tien-Tsung. 2006. Public Attitudes Toward Gays and Lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality 51, 2: 5777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiller, Renata. 2010. Reflexiones en torno a la ley de matrimonio igualitario. In Matrimonio igualitario: perspectivas sociales, políticas y jurídicas, ed. Pecheny, Mario, Clérico, Laura, Aldao, Martín, Hiller, Rafael de la Dehesa, and Meccia, Ernesto. Buenos Aires: Eudeba. 85130.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 2009. Cultural Change, Religion, Subjective Well-Being, and Democracy in Latin America. In Religious Pluralism, Democracy, and the Catholic Church in Latin America, ed. Hagopian, Frances. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 6795.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2010. Changing Mass Priorities: The Link Between Modernization and Democracy. Perspectives on Politics 8, 2: 55167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Baker, Wayne E.. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65, 1: 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsson, Niklas, Kotsadam, Andreas and Støre Jakobsson, Siri. 2013. Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage: The Case of Scandinavia. Journal of Homosexuality 60, 9: 134960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelin, Elizabeth, and Hershberg, Eric, eds. 1996. Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship, and Society in Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie. 1995. Social Movement Growth, Domain Expansion, and Framing Processes: The Gay/Lesbian Movement and Violence Against Gays and Lesbians as a Social Problem. Social Problems 42, 1: 14570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Roger N. 1992. Life Is Hard: Machismo, Danger, and the Intimacy of Power in Nicaragua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Roger N. 1997. Sexual Positions: Caveats and Second Thoughts on “Categories.” The Americas 54, 1: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Robert Gurr, Ted and Jaggers, Keith. 2014. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html Google Scholar
McCabe, Brian J., and Heerwig, Jennifer A.. 2012. Reframing the Marriage Debate: Wording, Context, and Intensity of Support for Marriage and Civil Unions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24, 4: 42949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, Stephen M. 2013. Contact with Gays and Lesbians and Same-Sex Marriage Support: The Moderating Role of Social Context. Social Science Research 42, 4: 115666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, Melinda S. 2005. Morality Politics vs. Identity Politics: Framing Processes and Competition Among Christian Right and Gay Social Movement Organizations. Sociological Forum 20, 4: 589612.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A. and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91, 3: 56783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Laura R., Cadge, Wendy and Harrison, James T.. 2006. Religion and Public Opinion About Same-Sex Marriage. Social Science Quarterly 87, 2: 34060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. 1995. Human Rights in the Processes of Transition and Consolidation of Democracy in Latin America. Political Studies 43, 1: 16888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Richard Guy. 1999. Beneath the Equator: Cultures of Desire, Male Homosexuality, and Emerging Gay Communities in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49, 1: 6585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polletta, Francesca, and Kai Ho, M.. 2006. Frames and Their Consequences. In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, ed. Goodin, Robert E. and Tilly, Charles. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 187204.Google Scholar
Rojas Martínez, Beatriz. 2009. [Quoted in] Diario de Debates Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal. Mexico City, December 22.Google Scholar
Schulenberg, Shawn. 2012. The Construction and Enactment of Same-Sex Marriage in Argentina. Journal of Human Rights 11, 1: 10625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2007. The Rise of Populism and the Left in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 18, 3: 8195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherkat, Darren E., Powell-Williams, Melissa, Maddox, Gregory andMattias de Vries, Kylan. 2011. Religion, Politics, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research 40, 1: 16780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Theriault, Sean M.. 2004. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, ed. Saris, Willem E. and Sniderman, . Princeton: Princeton University Press. 13365.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Burke Rochford, E. Jr., Worden, Steven K. and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51, 4: 46481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, G. Edward, and McMullin, Douglas R.. 1982. Tolerance of Sexual Nonconformity: City Size as a Situational and Early Learning Determinant. American Sociological Review 47, 3: 41115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkildsen, Nayda, and Schnell, Frauke. 1997. How Media Frames Move Public Opinion: An Analysis of the Women's Movement. Political Research Quarterly 50, 4: 879900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggione, Juan Marco. 2011. Sexual Rights and Religion: Same-Sex Marriage and Lawmakers' Catholic Identity in Argentina. University of Miami Law Review 65, 3: 93554.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Norrander, Barbara. 2002. Of Moods and Morals: The Dynamics of Opinion on Abortion and Gay Rights. In Understanding Public Opinion, ed. Norrander, and Wilcox, . Washington, DC: CQ Press. 12148.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Wolpert, Robin. 2000. Gay Rights in the Public Sphere: Public Opinion on Gay and Lesbian Equality. In The Politcs of Gay Rights, ed. Rimmerman, Craig A., Wald, Kenneth D., and Wilcox, . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 40932.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Wayne W. 2006. Exploring Heterosexual Women's Anti-Lesbian Attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality 51, 2: 13955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, David, and Brewer, Paul R.. 2010. Competing Frames for a Public Health Issue and Their Effects on Public Opinion. Mass Communication & Society 13, 4: 43557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2015. LAC_data Report. Databank. World Development Indicators. March 21. databank.worldbank.org/data/LAC_SSRdata/id/7dc6d59c.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1991. Information, Values, and Opinion. American Political Science Review 85, 4: 121537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaragoza, Gabriel León. 2009. Inmorales y aberrantes, las reformas aprobadas: Norberto Rivera. La Jornada (Mexico City), December 22, 29. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2009/12/22/capital/029n2cap Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dion and Díez supplementary material

Appendix

Download Dion and Díez supplementary material(File)
File 24 KB
You have Access
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Democratic Values, Religiosity, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Latin America
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Democratic Values, Religiosity, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Latin America
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Democratic Values, Religiosity, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Latin America
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *