Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:29:33.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Desultory Defense of Democracy: OAS Resolution 1080 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Barry S. Levitt*
Affiliation:
Emory University

Abstract

This article evaluates the effectiveness of OAS mechanisms for safeguarding democracy through multilateral diplomacy, what some scholars have dubbed the interamerican defense of democracy regime. Drawing on a range of international relations theories, this study derives competing hypotheses about member states' responses to democratic crises in the Americas. It then analyzes all instances in which a collective response—that is, an application of Resolution 1080 or the Inter-American Democratic Charter—was debated in the OAS between 1991 and 2002. Patterns of state behavior suggest that domestic politics, rather than the structural or systemic traits of the interamerican system, best explain foreign policy responses to crises of democracy in the region. The OAS record in confronting such crises is uneven.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abente-Brun, Diego. 1999. People Power in Paraguay. Journal of Democracy 10, 3: 1100.Google Scholar
Acevedo, Domingo. 1993. The Haitian Crisis and the OAS Response: A Test of Effectiveness in Protecting Democracy. In Enforcing Restraint: Collective Intervention in Internal Conflicts, ed. Lori, Fisler Damrosch New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press. 156.Google Scholar
Acevedo, Domingo, and Claudio, Grossman. 1996. The Organization of American States and the Protection of Democracy. In Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas, ed. Tom, Farer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 149.Google Scholar
Aharonian, Aram. 2002. Venezuela: un golpe con olor a hamburguesa, jamón y petróleo. América Latina en Movimiento Latin American Information Agency, April 28. Archived at http:alainet.org Accessed July 7, 2003.Google Scholar
Amoore, Topaz. 2002. Loyal Troops Rally to Ousted Venezuela Leader. Sunday Telegraph (London), April 14. Archived at http:www.telegraph.co.uk Accessed July 8, 2003.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Richard J. 1994. Making the Western Hemisphere Safe for Democracy?the Oas Defense-of-Democracy Regime. Washington Quarterly 17, 2: 169.Google Scholar
Bonilla, Laura. 2002. Oas to Invoke Democratic Charter against Venezuela. Agence France Presse, April 14. Archived at http:www.afp.com Accessed February 1, 2003.Google Scholar
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2002. Latin America Ambivalent over Military Coup. http:news.bbc.co.uk2hiamericas1927390.stm. April 13.Google Scholar
Cable News Network (CNN). 2002. Pentagon to Review Role in Venezuela. http:www.cnn.com2002US0423pentagon.venezuelaindex.html April 23.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell. 2001. Re: Draft Inter-American Democratic Charter. Unpublished memorandum to civil society consultancy groups. May 23.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell. 2003. Strengthening Checks and Balances: Democracy Defence and Promotion in the Americas. Canadian Foreign Policy 10, 3 (Spring): 116.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F., and Thomas, Legler. 2001a. The Oas Democratic Solidarity Paradigm: Questions of Collective and National Leadership. Latin American Politics and Society 43, 1 (Spring): 126.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F., and Thomas, Legler. 2001b. The Oas in Peru: a Model for the Future Journal of Democracy 12, 4 (October): 136.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Karen. 2002. U.S. Seen as Weak Patron of Latin Democracy. Washington Post , April 16: A15.Google Scholar
Diéguez, Margarita. 1998. Regional Mechanisms for the Maintenance of Peace and Security in the Western Hemisphere. In Regional Mechanisms and International Security in Latin America, ed. Olga, Pellicer. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. 1111.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. 1991. Geography and War: a Review and Reassessment of the Empirical Literature. International Interactions 17, 1: 127.Google Scholar
EFE News Service. 2002. Us, Oas Overtaken by Events in Venezuela. Global News Wire , April 14.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve, and Fred, Rosen. 2002. Crisis in Venezuela: the Remarkable Fall and Rise of Hugo Chávez: Coup, Chaos, or Misunderstanding NACLA Report on the Americas 36, 1 (July-August): 115.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, and Volker, Rittenberger. 1996. Interests, Power, Knowledge: the Study of International Regimes. Mershon International Studies Review 40, 2 (October): 1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautamäki, Veli-Pekka. 2002. Authoritative Interpretation of the Constitution: a Comparison of Argumentation in Finland and Norway. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 6, 3 (October). http:www.ejcl.org63art63-1.html.Google Scholar
Inter-American Dialogue (IAD). 1994. The Americas in 1994: A Time for Leadership. A Report of the Inter-American Dialogue to the Summit of Presidents and Prime Ministers of the Americas. Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue.Google Scholar
Kamen, Al. 2002. In the Loop. Column. Washington Post , April 19: A23.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32, 4 (December): 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1981. Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Riders. International Studies Quarterly 25, 2 (June): 154.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Legler, Thomas. 2003a. The Inter-American Democratic Charter: from Peru to Venezuela and beyond. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, Portland, Oregon, February 25-March 1.Google Scholar
Legler, Thomas. 2003b. Personal communication. July 8.Google Scholar
Legler, Thomas. 2003c. Peru Then and Now: the Inter-American Democratic Charter and Peruvian Democratization. Canadian Foreign Policy 10, 3 (Spring): 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Daniel, and Brian, Crisp. 1999. Venezuela: the Character, Crisis, and Possible Future of Democracy. World Affairs 161, 3 (Winter): 165.Google Scholar
Levitt, Barry. 2001. The Oas and Latin American Elections: Whither Resolution 1080?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August.Google Scholar
Levitt, Barry. 2002. Constitutionalism, Political Parties, and Presidential Power in Peru, 1985–2000: towards a Comparative Model of Legislative-Executive Relations in Presidential Systems. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Lucero, José Antonio. 2001. Crisis and Contention in Ecuador. Journal of Democracy 12, 2: 173.Google Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia. 2001. The Oas in Peru: Room for Improvement. Journal of Democracy 12, 4 (October): 140.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer. 2001. Comments on the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Summits of the Americas Bulletin 1, 1 (November): 14.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1948. Charter of the Organization of American States. Archived at http:www.oas.orgjuridicoEnglishcharter.html.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1991. Ser. P Ag/Res. 1080 (Xxi-O/91). June 5.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1992a. Ser. G Cp/Res. 576 (887/92). February 4.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1992b. Ser. G Mre/Res 1/92 April 13.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1996. Ser. G Cp/Res. 681 (1071/96). April 23.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1999a. Ser. G Cp/Acta 1185/99. March 24.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 1999b. Ser. G Cp/Acta 1186/99. March 31.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 2000a. Ser. G Cp/Res. 763 (1220/00). January 21.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 2000b. Ser. G Cp/Acta 1241/00. May 31.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 2001. Inter-American Democratic Charter. September 11. Archived at http:www.oas.org.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 2002a. Ser. P Ag/Acta 1 (Xxix-E/02). April 18.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 2002b. Ser. P Ag/Res. 1 (Xxix-E/02). April 18.Google Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS). 2002c. Ser. G Cp/Res. 811. April 13.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Andres. 2000. Slow-Motion Coup May Hit Peru. Miami Herald , March 5: 8A.Google Scholar
Palmer, David Scott. 1996. “Fujipopulism” and Peru's Progress. Current History 95, 598 (February): 1–75.Google Scholar
Pan, Eric J. 1997. Authoritative Interpretation of Agreements: Developing More Responsive International Administrative Regimes. Harvard International Law Journal 38: 503–35.Google Scholar
Parish, Randall, and Mark, Peceny. 2002. Kantian Liberalism and the Collective Defense of Democracy in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research 39, 2: 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2002. Democracy from the outside in?International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56, 3 (Summer): 149.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42, 3 (Summer): 160.Google Scholar
Rohter, Larry. 2002. Venezuela's 2 Fateful Days. New York times , April 20: A1.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Robin L. 2001. The Oas and the Summit of the Americas: Coexistence, or Integration of Forces for Multilateralism Latin American Politics and Society 43, 1: 1101.Google Scholar
San Martin, Nancy, and Tim, Johnson. 2002. Venezuelan Chaos Makes Region Uneasy. Miami Herald , April 14: 6A.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Fabiola. 2002. Ambassador Met Temporary President but Denies U.S. Aided Coup in Venezuela. Associated Press Worldstream, April 17. Archived at http:www.apdigitalnews.comaparchive.html.Google Scholar
Schnably, Stephen. 2000. Constitutionalism and Democratic Government in the Inter-American System. In Democratic Governance and International Law, ed. Gregory, Fox. and Brad, Roth. New York: Cambridge University Press. 198.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey, and Benjamin, Most. 1978. A Return Journey: Richardson, “Frontiers,” and War in the 1946–1965 Era. Journal of Conflict Resolution 22: 323–56.Google Scholar
Steves, Franklin. 2001. Regional Integration and Democratic Consolidation in the Southern Cone of Latin America. Democratization 8, 3 (Autumn): 1100.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1982. Cave Hic Dragones : a Critique of Regime Analysis. International Organization 36, 2 (Spring): 196.Google Scholar
Tamayo, Juan. 2002. Venezuela's Rebellion a Bizarre Mix of Events. Miami Herald , April 16: 1A.Google Scholar
Vaky, Viron, and Heraldo, Muñoz 1993. The Future of the Organization of American States. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1997. Paraguay: the Coup That Didn't Happen. Journal of Democracy 8, 1: 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, John. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villagrán, Francisco 1993. Thwarting the Guatemalan Coup. Journal of Democracy 4, 4: 124.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wise, Carol. 1997. State Policy and Social Conflict in Peru. In The Peruvian Labyrinth: Polity, Society, Economy, ed. Maxwell, Cameron. and Philip, Mauceri. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1106.Google Scholar
Young, Oran. 1991. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: on the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization 45, 3 (Summer): 1308.Google Scholar
Young, Oran. 1999. Governance in World Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar