Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Elite Preferences in a Consolidating Democracy: The Brazilian Legislative Surveys, 1990–2009

  • Timothy J. Power and Cesar Zucco

Abstract

This article examines key ideological, economic, and institutional preferences of the Brazilian political elite in the first 25 years of the country's present democratic regime. Introducing the unified dataset of the Brazilian Legislative Surveys, it examines several crucial dimensions of politicians' attitudes, including elite placement on a traditional left-right scale, preferences concerning the fundamental economic model, direct comparisons of the recent Cardoso and Lula governments, and orientations toward Brazil's global and regional projection. On many of the central issues, attitudes have remained stable, but on the dimensions that have seen notable change, nearly all the change has been in the direction of decreasing polarization. In contrast to the experience of some neighboring countries, the Brazilian case demonstrates that the sustained practice of democracy can lead to attitudinal convergence and macro-political stability, even when the initial political and socioeconomic conditions appear daunting.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Alcántara Sáez, Manuel, ed. 2007. Politicians and Politics in Latin America. Boulder : Lynne Rienner.
Aldrich, John H., and McKelvey, Richard D.. 1977. A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections. American Political Science Review 71, 1: 111–30.
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2009. O Brasil, Lijphart e o modelo consensual de democracia. In O legislativo brasileiro em perspectiva comparada, ed. Inácio, Magna and Rennó, Lucio. Belo Horizonte : Editora UFMG. 105–31.
Cason, Jeffrey, and Power, Timothy J.. 2009. Presidentialization, Pluralization, and the Rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining Change in Brazilian Foreign Policy Making in the Cardoso-Lula Era. International Political Science Review 30, 2 (March): 117–40.
Desposato, Scott W. 2007. Reforma política brasileira: o que precisa ser consertado, o que não precisa e o que fazer. In Instituições representativas no Brasil: balanço e reformas, ed. Nicolau, Jairo and Power, Timothy J.. Belo Horizonte : Editora UFMG. 123–53.
King, Gary, Murray, Christopher J. L., Salomon, Joshua A., and Tandon, Ajay. 2004. Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research. American Political Science Review 98, 1: 191207.
Mainwaring, Scott. 1991. Politicians, Parties, and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics 24: 2143.
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: the Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies 26, 2: 198228.
Martínez-Lara, Javier. 1996. Building Democracy in Brazil: The Politics of Constitutional Change, 1985–1995. New York : St. Martin's Press.
Mayorga, René. 2005. Bolivia's Democracy at the Crossroads. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott. New York : Cambridge University Press. 149–78.
McCoy, Jennifer L. 1999. Latin America's Imperiled Progress: Chávez and the End of “Partyarchy” in Venezuela. Journal of Democracy 10: 6477.
Montero, Alfred P. 2010. No Country for Leftists? Clientelist Continuity and the 2006 Vote in the Brazilian Northeast. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2, 2: 113–53.
Pierucci, Antônio Flávio. 1987. As bases da nova direita. Novos Estudos CEBRAP 19: 2645.
Poole, Keith. 1998. Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales. American Journal of Political Science 42, 3 (July): 954–93.
Power, Timothy J. 2000. The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.
Power, Timothy J., and Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2009. Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005. Latin American Research Review 44, 1 (February): 218–45.
Rodrigues, Leôncio Martins. 1987. Quem é quem na Constituinte: uma análise sócio-política dos partidos e deputados. São Paulo : OESP-Maltese.
Stokes, Donald. 1963. Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57, 2: 368–77.
Weyland, Kurt. 2005. The Growing Sustainability of Brazil's Low-Quality Democracy. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott. New York : Cambridge University Press. 90120.
Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Benoit, Kenneth. 2009. Presidents, Parties, and Policy Competition. Journal of Politics 71, 4: 1435–47.
Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2009. Ideology or What? Legislative Behavior in a Multiparty Presidentialist Setting. Journal of Politics 71, 3: 1076–92.
Zucco, Cesar Jr., and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2011. Distinguishing between Influences on Brazilian Legislative Behavior. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36, 3 (August): 363–96.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Latin American Politics and Society
  • ISSN: 1531-426X
  • EISSN: 1548-2456
  • URL: /core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed