Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:24:51.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expanding Accountability through Participatory Institutions: Mayors, Citizens, and Budgeting in Three Brazilian Municipalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Brian Wampler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As new political institutions provide Brazilians with unprecedented access to policymaking and decisionmaking venues, politicians and activists have undertaken reform efforts to promote institutional arrangements partly designed to expand accountability. The expansion of participatory decisionmaking venues may grant citizens greater authority, but these institutions could also undermine municipal councils’ ability to curb the prerogatives of mayors. This article analyzes participatory budgeting in São Paulo, Recife, and Porto Alegre to illustrate that mayors have differing capacities to implement their policy preferences, and this greatly affects how accountability may be extended.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , Summer 2004 , pp. 73 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, Rebecca. 1998. From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society 26 (October): 511–37.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2001. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E., Evelina, Dagnino, and Arturo, Escobar. 1998a. Introduction: the Cultural and the Political in Latin American Social Movements. in Alvarez et al. 1998b. 1–29.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E., Evelina, Dagnino, and Arturo, Escobar, eds. 1998b. Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2002a. Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2002b. O orçamento participativo: as experiências de Porto Alegre e Belo Horizonte. In Sociedade civil e espaço público, ed. Evelina, Dagnino. São Paulo: Cortez. 17–46.Google Scholar
Baierle, Sérgio Gregório. 1998. The Explosion of Experience: the Emergence of a New Ethical-Political Principle in Popular Movements in Porto Alegre, Brazil. in Alvarez et al. 1998b. 118–38.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2001. Participation, Activism, and Politics: the Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory. Politics and Society 29 (January): 43–72.Google Scholar
Couto, Cláudio Gonçalves. 1995. O desafio de sergoverno: o PT na prefeitura de São Paulo (1988–1992). Rio de Janiero: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Couto, Cláudio Gonçalves, and Fernando Luiz, Abrucio. 1995. Governando a cidade? a força e a fraqueza da câmara municipal. São Paulo em Perspectiva 9, 2: 57–65.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina. 1994. Os anos 90: política e sociedade no Brasil. São Paulo: Brasilense.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina. 1998. Culture, Citizenship, and Democracy: Changing Discourse and Practices of the Latin American Left. in Alvarez et al. 1998b. 33–63.Google Scholar
Diniz, Eli. 1982. Voto e mÁquina política: patronagem e clientelismo no Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Doimo, Ana Maria. 1995. A vez e a voz do popular movimentos sociais e participação pós-70. Rio de Janeiro: ANPOCS.Google Scholar
Erundina, Luiza. 1990. Sem medo de ser governo. Teoria e Debate 11, 3: 13–15.Google Scholar
Fedozzi, Luciano. 1998. Orçamento participativo: reflexões sobre a experiência de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre: Tomo Editorial.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Erik Olin, Wright. 2001. Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Politics and Society 29 (January): 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Canclini, Nestor. 1995. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Genro, Tarso. 1995. Reforma do estado e democratização do poder local. In Poder local, participação popular, construção da cidadania, ed. Renta, Villas-Boas and Vera, Telles. São Paulo: Fórum Nacional de Participação Popular nas Administrações Municipals. 19–27.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2000. Democratizing Pressures from Below? Social Movements in the New Brazilian Democracy. In Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes, ed. Peter, R. Kingstone and Timothy, J. Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 167–82.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro. 1989. Movimentos sociais e políticas públicas: demandas por saneamento básico e saúde. São Paulo, 1974–84. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro. 2000. Politicas sociais e amplicacão da cidadania. São Paulo: FGV.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro, and Marco, Antonio, Carvalho, Teixeira. 1996a. Orçamento participativo: co-responsabilidade na gestão das cidades. São Paulo em Perspectiva 10, 3: 119–28.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro, and Marco, Antonio, Carvalho, Teixeira. 1996b. Orçamento participativo: o caso de São Paulo (1989–1992), a luz das experiênicas de Porto Alegre e Belo Horizonte. Mimeograph. São Paulo: Centro de Estudos de Cultura Contemporânea.Google Scholar
Leal, Victor Nunes. 1997. Coronelismo, enxada e voto: o município e o regime representativo no Brasil. 3rd edition. São Paulo: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Marquetti, Adelmir. 2003. Democracia, equidade e effciencia, o caso do orçamento participativo em Porto Alegre. In A inovação democrática no Brasil: o orçamento participativo, ed. Leonardo, Avritzer and Zander, Navarro. São Paulo: Cortez. 129–56.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2000. Devolving Democracy? Political Decentralization and the New Brazilian Federalism. In Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes, ed. Peter, R. Kingstone and Timothy, J. Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 58–76.Google Scholar
Nylen, William R. 2002. Testing the Empowerment Thesis: the Participatory Budget in Belo Horizonte and Betim, Brazil. Comparative Politics 34 (January): 127–45.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies. Journal of Democracy 9, 3: 112–26.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Susan, C. Stokes, and Bernard, Manin. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1997. Decentralization in Mexico: from Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sales, Teresa. 1994. Raízes da desigualdade docial na cultura política brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 25, 9: 26–37.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1998. Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a Redistributive Democracy. Politics and Society 26, 4: 461–510.Google Scholar
Singer, Paul. 1996. Un governo de esquerda para todos: Luiza Erundina na prefeitura de São Paulo (1989–1992). São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina, and Enrique, Peruzzotti. 2000. Societal Accountability in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 11, 4: 147–58.Google Scholar
Soares, José Arlindo. 1998. Os desafios degestão municipal democrática: Recife. Recife: Cenro Josué de Castro.Google Scholar
Soler, Salvador. 1991. O Prezeis: um processo de participação popular na formação da cidade. Master's thesis. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ana Claudia. 2003. Experiências de orçamento participativo no Brasil, 1997–2000. In A inovação democrática no Brasil: o orçamento participativo, ed. Leonardo, Avritzer and Zander, Navarro. São Paulo: Cortez. 189–216.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 1999. Orçamento participativo: os paradoxos da participação e governo no Recife. Cadernos de Estudos Socials 15, 2: 343–73.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2000. Private Executives, Legislative Brokers, and Participatory Publics: Building Local Democracy in Brazil. Ph.D. diss. University of Texas.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian, and Leonardo, Avritzer. Forthcoming. Participatory Publics: Civil Society and New Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics.Google Scholar