Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T14:51:49.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lost Sexenio: Vicente Fox and the New Politics of Economic Reform in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Manuel Pastor Jr.  and
Carol Wise
Manuel Pastor Jr.
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Carol Wise
Affiliation:
School of International Relations at the University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 2000 presidential election of opposition candidate Vicente Fox signaled an end to seven decades of Mexico's single-party regime and seemed to herald the advent of truly competitive politics. But by 2003, economic reform had largely stalled, and Fox's party suffered a historically unprecedented midterm loss in the congress. This article analyzes the underpinnings of policy gridlock in the Fox administration. Fox inherited the need for microeconomic restructuring and increased competitiveness, more innovative and pragmatic state policies, the need to pay attention to the country's sharp income inequalities, and the challenge of crafting a political strategy that could build a middle ground and foster policy consensus. With his party's minority standing in the congress, Fox was constrained from the start by divided government. But more effective statecraft and coalition building would have helped. These will be essential elements for the success of any post-Fox regime.

Type
Policy Issues
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , Winter 2005 , pp. 135 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Allan, Drazen. 1991. Why Are Stabilizations Delayed American Economic Review 81, 5: 1170–88.Google Scholar
Baer, Delal M. 2004. Mexico at an Impasse. Foreign Affairs 83, 1: 102–p13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deBanco, México. 2005. Commercio Exterior series, http:www.banxico.org.mxeInfoFinancieraFSinfoFinanciera.html (Accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
Behrman, Jere, Nancy, Birdsall, and Miguel, Székely. 2000. Economic Reform and Wage Differentials in Latin America. Working Paper 435. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Blázquez, Jorge, and Javier, Santiso. 2004. Mexico: Is It an Ex-Emerging Market Journal of Latin American Studies 36, 2: 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecker, Robert. 2004. The North American Economies after Nafta: a Critical Appraisal. Paper presented at the 23rd Conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, October.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 2004. The Changing Mexican Voter, 1991–2000. in Middlebrook 2004. 108–29.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell, and Carol, Wise. 2004. The Political Impact of Nafta on Mexico: Reflections on the Political Economy of Democratic Transition. Canadian Journal of Political Science 37, 2: 301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chand, Vikram. 2001. Mexico's Political Awakening. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Chávez, Ignacio. 2001. Budget Analyst, Office of Health, Education, and Labor, Ministry of Finance (Hacienda). Authors' interview. Mexico City, March 23.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2002. Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35, 3: 284–313.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. 2004. Party Competition in Mexico: Evolution and Prospects. in Middlebrook 2004. 57–81.Google Scholar
De laCalle, Luis. 2001. Former Undersecretary for International Trade Negotiations, Ministry of Economy. Authors' interview. Mexico City, March 22.Google Scholar
Dickerson, María, and Reed, Johnson. 2005. Mexico City's Mayor Charged; Rivals Pay Bill. Los Angeles times, April 21.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 2003. Mexico: From PRI Dominance to Divided Democracy. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Michael, Shifter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 321–50.Google Scholar
Dussel Peters, Enrique. 2003. Industrial Policy, Regional Trends, and Structural Change in Mexico's Manufacturing Sector. In Confronting Development: Assessing Mexico's Economic and Social Policy Challenges, ed. Kevin, Middlebrook and Eduardo, Zepeda. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 241–74.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2001a. Country Report: Mexico. Eiu Country Report (April): 17.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2001b July: 15.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2002 April: 8.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2004 October: 17–18.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2005 January: 32.Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary. 2003. Mexico's Industrial Policy: Climbing Ahead and Falling behind in the World Economy? in Middlebrook and Zepeda 2003. 195–240.Google Scholar
Hanson, Gordon. 2003. What Has Happened to Wages in Mexico Since NAFTA? Working Paper 9563. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jonathan. 2003. El voto y la economia. Reforma (Mexico City), July 8.Google Scholar
Hernández, Gonzalo. 2003. Director of Program Evaluation, Ministry of Social Development (Sedesol). Authors' interview. Mexico City, July 11.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 1998. Facing Up to Inequality in Latin America. Washington, DC: IDB/Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 2005. China Ascendant: a Snapshot of Economic Performance. Idea (Ideas for Development in the Americas) (January–April): 1–2.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informática (INEGI). 1994. Encuesta nacional de ingresos y gastos de los hogares, Third Quarter, 1984, 1989, y 1992. Cd-Rom, 2 disks.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informática (INEGI). 2000. Encuesta nacional de ingresos y gastos de los hogares, Third Quarter, 1994, 1996 y 1998. Cd-Rom.Google Scholar
INEGI. Banco de Informacíon Económica (BIE). 2005a. Estadística de la industria maquiladora de exportacíon. http:dgcnesyp.inegi.gob.mxcgi-winbdientsi.exe (Accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
INEGI. Banco de Informacion Económica (BIE). 2005b. Encuesta industrial mensual. http:dgcnesyp.inegi.gob.mxcgi-winbdientsi.exe (Accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph. 2004. The Structure of the Mexican Electorate. In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Chappell, Lawson. Stanford/La Jolla: Stanford University Press/Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego. 91–122.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report: Mexico & NAFTA . 2000. Budget Sent to Congress. December 12: 6–7.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report: Mexico & NAFTA . 2003a. Employment the Big Problem. August 19: 9–10.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report: Mexico & NAFTA . 2003b. Mexico and China: Pushing Upmarket. October 21: 13–15.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2004. Fox's Mexico at Midterm. Journal of Democracy 15, 1: 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Daniel, and Kathleen, Bruhn. 2001. Mexico: The Struggle for Democratic Development. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Santiago. 2001. Reorienting Mexico's Social Policy. In Mexico in Transition, ed. Andrew, D. Selee. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Reports on the Americas no. 1. 27–34.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1994. Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference? In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Vol. 2, The Case of Latin America, ed. Linz, and Arturo, Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 3–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Acevedo, Gladys, and Angel, Salinas. 2000. How Mexico's Financial Crisis Affected Income Distribution. Working Paper no. 2406. Prepared for the project “Earnings Inequality After Mexico's Economic and Educational Reforms”. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lora, Eduardo, and Mauricio, Oliveira. 2004. The Electoral Consequences of the Washington Consensus. Washington, DC: Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhnow, David. 2005. Pemex Chief Says Mexican Oil Patch Needs Investors. Wall Street Journal, May 6: A13.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro, Poiré. 2004. The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change. in Domínguez and Lawson 2004. 293–319.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: the Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies 26, 2: 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino, Gustavo. 2003. Director of Planning, Ministry of Social Development (Sedesol). Authors' interview. Mexico City, July 11.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin J., ed. 2004. Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London/Lajolla: Institute of Latin American Studies/Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. El votante mexicano: democracia, actitudes politicas y conducta electoral. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2002. Explaining Legislative Politics in Latin America. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, and Benito, Nacif. New York: Cambridge University Press. 413–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo. 2004. Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 437–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, Manuel Jr., and Carol, Wise. 1999. The Politics of Second-Generation Reform. Journal of Democracy 10, 3: 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, Manuel Jr., and Carol, Wise. 2003. Picking up the Pieces: Comparing the Social Impacts of Financial Crises in Mexico and Argentina. Paper presented at the conference “Regional and International Implications of Financial Instability in Latin America,” Santa Cruz Center for International Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz, April 11–12. http:sccie.ucsc.edueventspasteventslaconference0403laconf0403papersPWAftertheFall.pdf.Google Scholar
Preston, Julia, and Sam, Dillon. 2004. Opening Mexico: The Making of a Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 2003. Elections and Economics in Contemporary Latin America. In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America: Competition, Transition, Collapse, ed. Carol, Wise and Riordan, Roett. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. 31–55.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Evelyne. 2003. Former Budget Analyst for social spending, Ministry of Finance, and key player in the design and launch of the Progresa program. Authors' interview. Mexico City, July 9.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian. 2002. Government Defeat: Voting Conditions, Constituency Influence, and Legislative Success. http:homepages.nyu.edu-sms267resum_tesis.pdf.Google Scholar
Schurman, Rachel. 1996. Chile's New Entrepreneurs and the “Economic Miracle”: Invisible Hand or a Hand from the State Studies in Comparative International Development 31, 2: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (SEDESOL). 2000. ¿Está dando buenos resultados Progresa? Informe de los resultados obtenidos de una evaluación realizada por el IFPRI [International Food Policy Research Institute]. Mexico City: SEDESOL.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Stephan, Haggard. 2001. Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems. In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, and Mathew, D. McCubbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 64–102.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred P., and Cindy, Skach. 1993. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidations: Parliamentalism versus Presidentialism. World Politics 46, 3: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey A. 2004. Changing Patterns of Executive-Legislative Relations in Mexico. in Middlebrook 2004. 133–67.Google Scholar
Wise, Carol. 2003. Reinventing the State: Economic Strategy and Institutional Change in Peru. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2003. Mexico: Government Programs and Poverty—A Diagnostic for 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar