Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:19:51.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Loyalty and Disloyalty in the Mexican Party System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Yann P. Kerevel*
Affiliation:
Political science at Lewis University. kereveya@lewisu.edu

Abstract

Why do politicians in Mexico switch parties? The party-switching literature suggests that politicians generally switch parties for office-seeking or policy-seeking motives, whereas literature on the Mexican party system suggests that switching may be related to party system realignment during the democratic transition. Using data on party switching across the political careers of politicians who served as federal deputies between 1997 and 2009, this study argues that party switching in Mexico can primarily be explained by the office-seeking behavior of ambitious politicians. Only in rare instances do politicians switch parties because of policy disagreements, and party system realignment fails to explain a large number of party switches. This article also suggests that the ban on consecutive re-election encourages party switching; after every term in office, Mexican politicians have the opportunity to re-evaluate their party affiliation to continue their careers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H., Bianco, and William T.. 1992. A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office Holders. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16, 8/9: 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, Lynda K. 2007. Party on? Politicians and Party Switching in Mexico. Politics 27, 3: 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2010. The Metamorphosis of Leadership in a Democratic Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T., Sousa, and David J.. 1992. Party System Change and Political Career Structures in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17, 3: 347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantú, Francisco, and Desposato, Scott. 2012. The New Federalism of Mexico's Party System. Journal of Politics in Latin America 4, 2: 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies. American Journal of Political Science 50, 1: 6280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W., and Scheiner, Ethan. 2008. Governmental Centralization and Party Affiliation: Legislator Strategies in Brazil and Japan. American Political Science Review 102: 509–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., Lawson, Chappell, and Moreno, Alejandro, eds. 2009. Consolidating Mexico's Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Freidenberg, Flavia. 2010. Dedazos, elecciones y encuestas: procesos de selección de candidatos de los diputados mexicanos en perspectiva comparada. Paper presented at the 5th Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política (ALACIP), Buenos Aires, July 28–30.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R., and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2003. The Electoral Consequences of Party Switching by Incumbent Members of Congress, 1947–2000. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, 1: 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, William B., and Mershon, Carol. 2005. Party Switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996–2001. Journal of Politics 67, 2: 536–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, William B. 2008. Dealing in Discipline: Party Switching and Legislative Voting in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1988–2000. American Journal of Political Science 52, 4: 910–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, William B. 2009a. Integrating Theoretical and Empirical Models of Party Switching. In Heller and Mershon 2009b. 2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, William B., and Mershon, Carol, eds. 2009b. Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, Horacio. 2011. Inicio éxodo de legisladores. El Universal (Mexico City), December 26.Google Scholar
Kerevel, Yann P. 2010. The Legislative Consequences of Mexico's Mixed-Member Electoral System, 2000–2009. Electoral Studies 29, 4: 691703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Yann P. 2013. A Snakes and Ladders Theory of Political Ambition: the Implications of Pursuing a Political Career without Re-election. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 29–September 1.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44, 2: 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2005. Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 2 (Summer): 103–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer, Marcus, and Pattai, Vello. 2009. Party Switching, Party Systems, and Political Representation. In Heller and Mershon 2009b. 265–86.Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2010. Governors and Their Deputies: New Legislative Principals in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35, 2: 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mershon, Carol, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2008. Parliamentary Cycles and Party Switching in Legislatures. Comparative Political Studies 41, 1: 99127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2009. La decisión electoral. Mexico City: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Pacheco Méndez, Guadalupe. 2009. El Pri: relación interna de fuerzas y conflicto en la víspera del proceso electoral de 2006. Política y Gobierno 16, 1: 157–90.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Harold. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: an Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences. Comparative Political Studies 38, 7: 824–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo, and Langston, Joy. 2011. Gubernatorial Effects on the Voting Behavior of National Legislatures. Journal of Politics 73, 2: 477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David J. 2000. The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil. Journal of Politics 62, 1: 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David J. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 2 (Summer): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabad, Goldie, Slomczynski, and Kazimierz M.. 2004. Inter-Party Mobility among Parliamentary Candidates in Post-Communist East Central Europe. Party Politics 10, 2: 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thames, Frank C. 2007. Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998–2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32, 2: 223–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Darren. 2003. Democratizing a Hegemonic Regime: from Institutionalized Party to Institutionalized Party System in Mexico? Democratization 10, 3: 1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar