Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:29:19.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reelection Debate in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

John M. Carey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The debate over presidential reelection reappeared in Latin America in the last decade, and promises to continue in the years ahead. Arguments in favor contend that the possibility of immediate reelection increases politicians' responsiveness to citizen demands and allows voters the freedom to retain popular incumbents. Arguments against emphasize the danger of abuse of power by incumbents who seek to prolong their tenure. This article illustrates the parallels between these arguments and those made historically regarding the issue. It also suggests that the means by which provisions to allow reelection are adopted can provide valuable signals of their consequences.

Type
Policy Issues
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , Spring 2003 , pp. 119 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberdi, Juan Bautista. 1915. Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la República Argentina Buenos Aires: La Cultura Argentina.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Rui. 1933. Comentários à constituição federal brasileira, vol. 3. São Paulo: Livraria Acadêmica.Google Scholar
Bierck, Harold A. Jr., ed. 1951. Selected Writings of Bolívar New York: Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congreso de Argentina. 1948. Diarios de sesiones de la Cámara de Diputados de la Nación. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Congreso del Perú. 2001. Diario de los debates June 14, sesión nro. 27, Comisión Permanente http:www.congreso.gob.peindex.asp.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2001. Personal communication. January 14.Google Scholar
Gómez, Albarello, Juan, Gabriel. 2001. Personal communication. January 14.Google Scholar
González, Cleto. 1958. Personal del poder ejecutivo de Costa Rica, 1821–1936 Updated by Ricardo Fernández Peralta [1974?]. San José.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 1789 [1961]. The Federalist Papers New York: Signet.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997. Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott, Mainwaring and Matthew, Soberg Shugart. New York: Cambridge University Press. 259–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1994. Presidentialism or Parliamentarism: Does It Make a Difference The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, vol. 2, ed. Juan, J. Linz and Arturo, Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 3–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. 1787 [1966]. Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, Reported by James Madison Columbus: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter 1993. Enciclopedia electoral latinoamericana y del Caribe San José, Costa Rica: CAPEL.Google Scholar
Sampay, Arturo. 1949. Convención nacional constituyente Buenos Aires: Congreso de la Nación.Google Scholar
Serrafero, Mario D. 1997. Reelección y sucesión presidencial: poder y continuidad. Argentina, América Latina, y EE.UU Buenos Aires: Belgrano.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Universal (Caracas) 2000. March 6: 1–10.Google Scholar