Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-09T04:49:25.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reevaluating the Role of Ideology in Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2021

Giancarlo Visconti Open the ORCID record for Giancarlo Visconti [Opens in a new window]
Giancarlo Visconti*
Affiliation:
Giancarlo Visconti is an assistant professor of political science at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. gviscont@purdue.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Voters’ ideological stances have long been considered one of the most important factors for understanding electoral choices in Chile. In recent years, however, the literature has begun to call this premise into question, due to several changes in the Chilean political landscape: the current crisis of representation, the high programmatic congruence between the two main coalitions, the decline in the political relevance of the dictatorship, and the rise of nonprogrammatic electoral strategies. In addition to these transformations, Chile switched to voluntary voting in 2012. This article studies whether ideology still informs electoral choices in Chile in an era of voluntary voting. It implements a conjoint survey experiment in low-to-middle-income neighborhoods in Santiago, where voters would be expected to be less ideological. It shows that candidates’ ideological labels are crucial for understanding the electoral decisions of a large part of the sample, particularly among likely voters.

Keywords

Ideologypolitical behaviorelectoral choicesconjoint experimentChile

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
© The Author, 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: I declare none.

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alenda, Stéphanie, Le Foulon, Carmen, and Suárez-Cao, Julieta. 2018. La batalla por las ideas en tiempos post-ideológicos: adaptaciones y permanencias ideológicas en la nueva centro-derecha chilena. Revista de Sociologia e Política 27, 70: 1–18.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry, and Smith, Amy Erica. 2010. Knowing Left from Right: Ideological Identification in Brazil, 2002–2006. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2, 3: 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Jason Ross, and Samuels, David J.. 2011. Evidence from Public Opinion. In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, ed. Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth M.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 31–51.Google Scholar
Avendaño, Octavio, and Sandoval, Pablo. 2016. Desafección política y estabilidad de los resultados electorales en Chile, 1993–2009. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 24, 47: 175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2011. The Latin American Left’s Mandate: Free-Market Policies and Issue Voting in New Democracies. World Politics 63, 1: 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargsted, Matías Andrés, and Maldonado, Luis. 2018. Party Identification in an Encapsulated Party System: The Case of Postauthoritarian Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America 10, 1: 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargsted, Matías A., and Somma, Nicolás M. 2016. Social Cleavages and Political Dealignment in Contemporary Chile, 1995–2009. Party Politics 22, 1: 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2016. Pastors for Pinochet: Authoritarian Stereotypes and Voting for Evangelicals in Chile. Journal of Experimental Political Science 3, 2: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, Claudio A., Carlin, Ryan E., Love, Gregory J., and Méndez, Ernesto Silva. 2011. Social or Political Cleavages? A Spatial Analysis of the Party System in Post-Authoritarian Chile. Public Choice 146, 1–2: 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brieba, Daniel, and Bunker, Kenneth. 2019. Voter Equalization and Turnout Bias After Electoral Reform: Evidence from Chile’s Voluntary Voting Law. Latin American Politics and Society 61, 4: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1974. Political Change in Britain: Basis of Electoral Choice. 2d ed. New York, St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabezas, José Miguel, and Navia, Patricio. 2005. Efecto del sistema binominal en el número de candidatos y de partidos en elecciones legislativas en Chile, 1989–2001. Política 45: 29–51.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2019. Non-policy Politics: Richer Voters, Poorer Voters, and the Diversification of Electoral Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E. 2006. The Decline of Citizen Participation in Electoral Politics in Post-Authoritarian Chile. Democratization 13, 4: 632–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., Singer, Matthew M., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., eds. 2015. The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 2017. Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública no. 80. Technical Report. July–August. Santiago: CEP.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mollie J., and Smith, Amy Erica. 2016. Do Authoritarians Vote for Authoritarians? Evidence from Latin America. Research and Politics 3, 4. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053168016684066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep M., and Escatel, Luis E.. 2004. The Left-Right Dimension in Latin America. Economics Working Paper 813. Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, Gonzalo, Joignant, Alfredo, and Morales, Mauricio. 2016. The Return of Censitary Suffrage? The Effects of Automatic Voter Registration and Voluntary Voting in Chile. Democratization 23, 3: 520–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1962. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Critical Review 18, 1–3: 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Pierce, Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, Rioseco, Diego, Pilar Giannini, Luna, Juan Pablo, and Núñez, Rodrigo. 2006. El secreto de mi éxito: seis caminos para llegar y permanecer en Valparaíso. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 26, 1: 169–90.Google Scholar
Disi, Rodolfo. 2018. Sentenced to Debt: Explaining Student Mobilization in Chile. Latin American Research Review 53, 3: 448–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoso, Sofia, and Von Bülow, Marisa. 2017. Social Movements in Chile: Organization, Trajectories, and Political Consequences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Došek, Tomáš, and Flavia, Freidenberg. 2014. Voto hacia nuevos candidatos en sistemas de partidos (des)institucionalizados: el caso de Marco Enríquez-Ominami en Chile 2009. Revista SAAP 8, 1: 11–42.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65, 2 (April): 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echegaray, Fabián. 2005. Economic Crises and Electoral Responses in Latin America. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Fábrega, Jorge, González, Jorge, and Lindh, Jaime. 2018. Polarization and Electoral Incentives: The End of the Chilean Consensus Democracy, 1990–2014. Latin American Politics and Society 60, 4: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Arturo. 1995. Significado del eje derecha-izquierda. Estudios Públicos 58 (otoño): 79–135.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Ricardo, López, Miguel Ángel, and Baeza, Jaime. 2013. La evolución programática de los partidos chilenos 1970–2009: de la polarización al consenso. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 33, 2: 443–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gélineau, François, and Singer, Matthew M.. 2015. The Economy and Incumbent Support in Latin America. In Carlin et al. 2015. 281–99.Google Scholar
Giannini, Pilar, Bahamonde, Héctor, Luna, Juan Pablo, López, Rodolfo, Astete, Martín Ordóñez, and Recart, Gonzalo. 2011. El secreto de mi éxito. Parte II. Los caminos a Valparaíso en 2009. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 31, 2: 285–310.Google Scholar
González, Ricardo, and Bernardo, Mackenna. 2017. Un modelo de votante probable para la encuesta CEP. Puntos de Referencia 466, Centro de Estudios Públicos, Santiago.Google Scholar
González Ferrer, Luis, and Velasco, Rosario Queirolo. 2013. Izquierda y derecha: formas de definirlas, el caso latinoamericano y sus implicaciones. América Latina Hoy 65: 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán, Eugenio. 1993. Reflexiones sobre el sistema binominal. Estudios Públicos 51: 303–25.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Hangartner, Dominik, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2015. Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments Against Real-World Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 8: 2395–2400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2014. Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis 22, 1: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbers, Imke, de Vries, Catherine E., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2013. Attitude Variability Among Latin American Publics: How Party System Structuration Affects Left/Right Ideology. Comparative Political Studies 46, 8: 947–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jara, Alejandra. 2017. Piñera se abre a ampliar gratuidad en educación superior. La Tercera, November 23.Google Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A. 2009. Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election. American Political Science Review 103, 1: 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo, Morales, Mauricio, and Fuentes, Claudio. 2017. Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries: Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T. 2006. The End of the End of Ideology. American Psychologist 61, 7: 651–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk A., Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Kathleen. 2006. Transformations of the Concept of Ideology in the Twentieth Century. American Political Science Review 100, 4: 619–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45, 4: 951–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, Teresa E., and Miller, Warren E.. 1979. Ideological Interpretations of Presidential Elections. American Political Science Review 73, 3: 751–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Miguel Ángel, and Baeza, Jaime. 2011. Las elecciones chilenas de 2009–10: ¿se derechizó el país? In América Latina: política y elecciones del bicentenario (2009–2010), ed. Tagina, María Laura and Sáez, Manuel Alcántara. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitutionales. 277–302.Google Scholar
López, Miguel Ángel, Miranda, Nicolás, and Valenzuela-Gutiérrez, Pablo A.. 2013. Estimando el espacio político del Cono Sur y Brasil: las elecciones presidenciales en el eje izquierda-derecha. Postdata 18, 2: 403–42.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Altman, David. 2011. Uprooted But Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization. Latin American Politics and Society 53, 2: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Mardones, Rodrigo. 2017. La columna vertebral fracturada: revisitando intermediarios políticos en Chile. Santiago: RIL Editores.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2015. Partisanship in Latin America. In Carlin et al. 2015. 226–45.Google Scholar
Maillet, Antoine. 2013. La construcción política de los mercados. Variedades de neoliberalismo en el Chile post-dictadura (1990–2010). Doctoral thesis. Santiago/ Paris: PUC Santiago/SciencesPo.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela, and Giancarlo, Visconti. 2020. Voting for the Lesser Evil: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in Romania. Political Science Research and Methods 8, 2: 315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, Mauricio. 2010. Disolución de la identificación partidaria en Chile. Encuesta Nacional UDP 2010. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales. 45–59.Google Scholar
Moreno, Daniel E. 2015. Ethnicity and Electoral Preferences in Latin America. In Carlin et al. 2015. 122–42.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana. 2015. Gender and the Latin American Voter. In Carlin et al. 2015. 143–68.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana, and Meléndez, Carlos. 2016. Parties Under Stress: Using a Linkage Decay Framework to Analyze the Chilean Party System. Journal of Politics in Latin America 8, 3: 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victoria, Murillo, M., and Visconti, Giancarlo. 2017. Economic Performance and Incumbents’ Support in Latin America. Electoral Studies 45: 180–90.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2009. The Chilean Left: Socialist and Neoliberal. In Beyond Neoliberalism in Latin America? Societies and Politics at the Crossroads, ed. Burdick, John, Oxhorn, Philip, and Roberts, Kenneth M.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Eugenio. 2003. Los partidos políticos chilenos: cambio y estabilidad en el comportamiento electoral 1990–2000. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 23, 2: 109–47.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 2012. The Rise of Leftist-Populist Governance in Latin America: The Roots of Electoral Change. Comparative Political Studies 45, 8: 947–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2018. Party Vibrancy and Democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, and Castiglioni, Rossana. 2016. Introduction: Challenges to Political Representation in Contemporary Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America 8, 3: 3–24.Google Scholar
Ruth, Saskia P. 2016. Clientelism and the Utility of the Left-Right Dimension in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 58, 1: 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastián M. 2015. Using joint Scaling Methods to Study Ideology and Representation: Evidence from Latin America. Political Analysis 23, 3: 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado, José. 2013. Piñera y el plebiscito: fue una decisión sabia votar por el NO. 24 Horas, October 5.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2008. How Can Governments Be Accountable If Voters Vote Ideologically? In Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions, and Accountability, ed. Maravall, José María and Sánchez-Cuenca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 45–81.Google Scholar
Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., Stewar, Marianne C t, and Whiteley, Paul. 2011. Downs, Stokes and the Dynamics of Electoral Choice. British Journal of Political Science 41, 2: 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, Timothy R. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Segovia, Carolina. 2017. Malaise and Democracy in Chile. In Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries: Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay, ed. Joignant, Alfredo, Morales, Mauricio, and Fuentes, Claudio. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2007. The Rise of Populism and the Left in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 18, 3: 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Maya. 2017. How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment. Political Research Quarterly 70, 2: 374–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M. 2017. Crisis of Representation in Chile? The Institutional Connection. Journal of Politics in Latin America 8, 3: 61–93.Google Scholar
Somma, Nicolás M., Matías, Bargsted, Rodolfo Disi, Pavlic, and Medel, Rodrigo M.. 2020. No Water in the Oasis: The Chilean Spring of 2019–2020. Social Movement Studies, February. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. Spatial Models of Party Competition. American Political Science Review 57, 2: 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tironi, Eugenio, and Felipe, Agüero. 1999. ¿Sobrevivirá el nuevo paisaje político chileno? Estudios Públicos 74: 151–68.Google Scholar
Torcal, Mariano, and Scott, Mainwaring. 2003. The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science 33, 1: 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, Paulina. 2014. Hernán Larraín, senador UDI: referencias al golpe deben ser replanteadas en los principios UDI. La Tercera, March 18.Google Scholar
Toro, Sergio. 2008. De lo épico a lo cotidiano: jóvenes y generaciones políticas en Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política 28, 2: 143–60.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael W. 2015. Alternative Methods for Estimating Election Outcomes. Estudios Públicos 137: 7–42.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael W., and Tucker, Clyde. 1984. Strategies for Predicting Whether a Citizen Will Vote and Estimation of Electoral Outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly 48, 18: 330–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Visconti, Giancarlo. 2018. Political Preferences in Adverse Conditions. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University.Google Scholar
Visconti, Giancarlo. 2019. Economic Perceptions and Electoral Choices: A Design-Based Approach. Political Science Research and Methods 7, 4: 795–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Doyle, David. 2012. Attitudes, Ideological Associations and the Left–Right Divide in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America 4, 1: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2015. Left-Right Identifications and the Latin American Voter. In Carlin et al. 2015. 195–224.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Corral, Margarita. 2012. Individual and Contextual Constraints on Ideological Labels in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 46, 6: 921–25.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Visconti Dataset

Dataset

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/laps
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Visconti supplementary material

Appendix

Download Visconti supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 196.9 KB