Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:26:49.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uruguay and Contemporary Theories of Wage Coordination: Origins and Stabilization of Segmented Neocorporatism, 2005–2019

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2021

Sebastián Etchemendy Open the ORCID record for Sebastián Etchemendy [Opens in a new window]
Sebastián Etchemendy*
Affiliation:
Sebastián Etchemendy is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and International Studies, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, and a researcher with CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. setchemendy@utdt.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study seeks to explain the rise and performance of “segmented neocorporatism” in Uruguay in light of contemporary theories of wage coordination, largely framed by the Varieties of Capitalism school and its recent critics. First it argues that the legacy of a centralized labor law framework, and a unified union movement, combined with Frente Amplio’s decisive labor empowerment from above to launch neocorporatist wage coordination in the period 2005–10. Second, it analyzes the stabilization of the coordinated model in 2013–19, in times of sluggish growth and labor tensions, evinced in the control of inflation pressures and social conflict. The article concludes that the macroeconomic combination of supply-side and Keynesian policies and the inclusion of precarious workers shaped an egalitarian version of corporatism with important challenges ahead.

Keywords

political economyneocorporatismwage coordinationUruguay
Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 51 - 77
Copyright
© The Author, 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: I, Sebastián Etchemendy, declare none.

References

REFERENCES

Baccaro, Lucio, and Jonas, Pontusson. 2016. Rethinking Comparative Political Economy: The Growth Model Perspective. Politics and Society 44, 2: 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, and Jonas, Pontusson. 2019. Social Blocs and Growth Models: An Analytical Framework with Sweden and Germany as Illustrative Cases. Working Paper 7, Faculté des Sciences de la Societé, Université de Genève, April.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A. 2012. Small Latecomers into the Global Market. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A.. 2019. The Reconstruction of Business Interests After the ISI Collapse: Unpacking the Effect of Institutional Change in Chile and Uruguay. Third World Quarterly 40, 7: 1378–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogliaccini, Juan A., and Aldo Madariaga. 2020. Varieties of Skills Profiles in Latin America: A Reassessment of the Hierarchical Model of Capitalism. Journal of Latin American Studies 52, 3: 601–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bril, Tomás, and Cecilia, Rocha. 2019. La nueva economía política comparada de los países pequeños: reflexiones desde América Latina y a partir del caso de Uruguay. Unpublished mss., Universidad Nacional de San Martín.Google Scholar
Lars, Calmfors, and Driffll, John. 1988. Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance. Economic Policy 3, 6: 13–61.Google Scholar
Cameron, David. 1984 . Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labour Quiescence and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society. In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. John, H. Goldthorpe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 143–78.Google Scholar
Carneiro, Fabricio. 2016. Desagregando reformas: comparando la regulación laboral en izquierdas moderadas. Master’s thesis, Torcuato Di Tella University.Google Scholar
Chasquetti, Daniel, and Daniel, Buquet. 2005. Elecciones Uruguay 2004: descifrando el cambio. Revista de Ciencia Política 25: 143–52.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 1977. Class Conflict and the Industrial Relations Crisis: Compromise and Corporatism in the Policies of the British State. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Estévez-Abe, Margarita, , Torben Iversen, , and Soskice, David. 2001. Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State. In Varieties of Capitalism, ed. Hall, Peter and Soskice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145–83.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2019. The Rise of Segmented Neocorporatism in South America: Wage Coordination in Argentina and Uruguay (2005–2015). Comparative Political Studies 52, 10: 1427–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etchemendy, Sebastián, and Collier, Ruth B.. 2007. Down But Not Out: Union Resurgence and Segmented Neocorporatism in Argentina, 2003–2007. Politics and Society 35, 3: 363–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filgueira, Fernando. 1991. El movimiento sindical en la encrucijada: de la restauración a la transformación democrática. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 4: 67–82.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J., Jr., and Hall, Peter A. 2000 . Institutional Dimensions of Coordinating Wage Bargaining and Monetary Policy. In Unions, Employers and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies, ed. Iversen, Torben, Pontusson, Jonas, and Soskice, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173–204.Google Scholar
Garriga, Carolina. 2016. Central Bank Independence in the World: A New Dataset. International Interactions 42, 5: 849–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander I., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guevara, Julio. 2018. Business negotiator on the Commerce Wage Council. Author interview. Montevideo, November 13.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Paul, Pierson. 2002. Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State. Politics and Society 2, 30: 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1994. Central Bank Independence and Coordinated Wage Bargaining: Their Interaction in Germany and Europe. German Politics and Society no. 31 (Spring): 1–23.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, and David, Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics andWage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2006. Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists. World Politics 2, 58: 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzaro, Jorge. 1986. Sindicatos y sistema politico : Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Kenneth, Roberts. 2011. Introduction. In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, ed. Levitsky and Roberts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Fernando. 2010. La política económica del primer gobierno del Frente Amplio. In Consenso progresisto, ed. Bustos, Pablo. Buenos Aires: Fundación Ebert. 145–92.Google Scholar
Loustaunau, Nelson E. 2010. Consejos de salarios. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailhos, Juan. 2016. Business negotiator, Uruguay National Chamber of Commerce and Services. Author interview. Montevideo, September 7.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Duane, Swank. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Kathleen, Thelen. 2007. The State and Coordinated Capitalism: Contributions of the Public Sector to Social Solidarity in Postindustrial Societies. World Politics 60, 1: 1–36.Google Scholar
Masoller, Andrés. 2017. Chief of the Cabinet of Advisers in charge of wage policy, Ministry of Economics and Finance. Author interview. Montevideo, September 14.Google Scholar
Mazzuchi, Graciela. 2009. Las relaciones laborales en Uruguay de 2005 a 2008. Documento de trabajo no. 6. Geneva: Inernational Labor Organization.Google Scholar
Official, Ministry of Economics. 2017 Author interview. Montivideo, September 14.Google Scholar
Otegui, Ignacio. 2018. President, Chamber of Construction of Uruguay (CCU). Author interview. Montevideo, November 12.Google Scholar
El País. 2020. El salario real no creció en 2019 y los jubilados recibirán ajuste menor a la inflación. January 31. https://negocios.elpais.com.uy/noticias/ims.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pérez Betancur, Verónica, and Piñeiro, Rafael. 2016. Uruguay 2015: Los desafíos de gobernar por izquierda cuando la economía se contrae. Revista de Ciencia Política 36: 339–63.Google Scholar
Pérez, Betancur, Verónica, Rafael Piñeiro, and Fernando, Rosenblatt. 2019. How Party Activism Survives: Uruguay’s Frente Amplio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucci, Francisco. 1992. Sindicatos negociación colectiva. Montevideo: Ediciones CIESU.Google Scholar
Pucci, Francisco, Nión, Soledad, and Ciapessoni., Fiorella 2014 . La negociación colectiva en el primer gobierno de izquierda del Uruguay. Latin American Research Review 49, 2: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1991. Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schipani, Andrés. 2020. The Left and the Labor Movement in Latin America. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 9–13.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 1991. Bringing Capital Back In, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-Class alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden. World Politics 43, 4: 513–44.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vallcorba, Martín. 2017. Official of the Cabinet of Advisers in charge of wage policy, Ministry of Economics and Finance. Author interview. Montevideo, September 14.Google Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2019. ICTWSS Data base. Version 6.1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael, and Miriam, Golden. 2000 . Postwar Wage Setting in the Nordic Countries. In Unions, Employers and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies, ed. Iversen, Torben, Pontusson, Jonas, and Soskice, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 107–36.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Etchemendy Dataset

Dataset

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/laps
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Etchemendy supplementary material

Appendix

Download Etchemendy supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 87 KB