Gibson, Josh 2017. The Chartists and the Constitution: Revisiting British Popular Constitutionalism. Journal of British Studies, Vol. 56, Issue. 01, p. 70.
Mirow, M. C. 2014. The Age of Constitutions in the Americas. Law and History Review, Vol. 32, Issue. 02, p. 229.
Approximately 50 years ago, R. R. Palmer published his two volume masterwork The Age of the Democratic Revolution. Designed as a “comparative constitutional history of Western civilization,” it charted the struggles after 1776 over ideas of popular sovereignty and civil and religious freedoms, and the spreading conviction that, instead of being confined to “any established, privileged, closed, or self-recruiting groups of men,” government might be rendered simple, accountable and broadly based. Understandably, Palmer placed great emphasis on the contagion of new-style constitutions. Between 1776 and 1780, eleven onetime American colonies drafted state constitutions. These went on to inform the provisions of the United States Constitution adopted in 1787, which in turn influenced the four Revolutionary French constitutions of the 1790s, and helped to inspire new constitutions in Haiti, Poland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and elsewhere. By 1820, according to one calculation, more than sixty new constitutions had been attempted within Continental Europe alone, and this is probably an underestimate. At least a further eighty constitutions were implemented between 1820 and 1850, many of them in Latin America. The spread of written constitutions proved in time almost unstoppable, and Palmer left his readers in no doubt that this outcome could be traced back to the Revolution of 1789, and still more to the Revolution of 1776. Despite resistance by entrenched elites, and especially from Britain, “the greatest single champion of the European counter-revolution,” a belief was in being by 1800, Palmer argued, that “democracy was a matter of concern to the world as a whole, that it was a thing of the future, [and] that while it was blocked in other countries the United States should be its refuge.”
1. Palmer R.R., The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800, 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959–64), I:v, 4.
2. For lists of written constitutions during the age of revolutions, see Hill Henry Bertram, “The Constitutions of Continental Europe: 1789–1813,” Journal of Modern History 8 (1936): 82–84; and Elkins Zachary and Ginsberg Tom, The Endurance of National Constitutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 215–21. Such (differing) estimates convey only a limited idea of the scale of constitutional activism. In Northern Italy alone, thirteen new constitutions were drafted between 1796 and 1810: Woloch Isser, ed. Revolution and the Meanings of Freedom in the Nineteenth Century (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996), 222.
3. Palmer, Age of Democratic Revolution, II:459, 545–6.
4. Armitage David, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), 20, 103, 138; Subrahmanyam Sanjay and Armitage David, eds. The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c.1760–1840 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
5. For the persistence and diversity of empire over time, see Darwin John, After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire since 1405 (London: Allen Lane, 2007).
6. See Larry Diamond, “A report card on democracy”, www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/7310.
7. The Rosetta Stone (London: British Museum Press, 2005), 32.
8. The long-distance deployment and circulation of texts by secular and religious authorities in order to spread ideas and influence was scarcely novel. However, increased levels of imperial competition and warfare after 1750, and the growth of towns, literacy, and printing outlets, led to governments and state agents—and some of those resisting them—to deploy texts and print on a greater scale than before, and not just in the West. Thus in 1787, the year of the drafting of the United States Constitution, the Imperial Household Department in Beijing completed its Comprehensive Treatises of our August Dynasty, a printed study of languages existing in the Ching Empire. These treatises were designed both for administrative and religious purposes, and to display and celebrate the Ching Emperor's reach and reputation. I owe this information to Mårten Söderblom Saarela.
9. Israel Jonathan, A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 236.
10. Pryde George S., ed. The Treaty of Union of Scotland and England 1707 (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1950), 83. It has been suggested that this treaty's guarantee of the persistence of Scots law in tandem with English common law is one reason why a united British polity failed to generate a single codified constitution.
11. St. John Henry, Bolingbroke Viscount, A Dissertation Upon Parties; In Several Letters to Caleb D'Anvers (London: H. Haines, 1735), 210; and Dickinson Harry T., “The Eighteenth-Century Debate on the Sovereignty of Parliament,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 26 (1976): 189–210. As late as 1912, a leading Oxford jurist, Anson William R., felt able to claim that “even thirty years ago educated men were slow to admit, that Parliament…has constitutionally a right to make any new law it pleases, to repeal any law, or to change or abolish any law”: Rights of Citizenship: A Survey of Safeguards for the People (London: Frederick Warne & Co, 1912), 88.
12. The degree to which Blackstone's Olympian style and posthumous reputation have sometimes covered over ambiguities and tensions in his arguments and ideas is carefully analyzed in Lieberman David, The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), especially 31–67.
13. The Great Charter and Charter of the Forests, with Other Authentic Instruments (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1759), lix. James Madison famously advanced the charge that Westminster's power was “uncontrollable,” in Federalist No. 53 in 1788.
14. A radical interpretation of the Magna Carta as a barrier against undue power “either by Prince or state endeavoured” had persisted since the civil wars of the 1640s: Pallister Anne, Magna Carta: the Heritage of Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), 15.
15. For an example, see Kammen Michael, A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2008 ), 91.
16. See, for example, Charles Willson Peale's 1790 portrait of Timothy Matlack with a copy of the constitution of Pennsylvania, on display at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. John Singleton Copley had already drawn on this pictorial convention before the Revolution, portraying Samuel Adams in 1772 pointedly gesturing toward a copy of the charter of Massachusetts.
17. Bailyn Bernard, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1992 ), 67.
18. Quoted in Fraser Leon, English Opinion of the American Constitution and Government, 1783–1798 (New York: n.p., 1915), 57.
19. Bruce William and Joy Henry, in Belfast Politics: Thoughts on the British Constitution, ed. Bew John (Dublin: University College Dublin Press, 2005), 52; for Fox, see The Parliamentary Register; or History of the Proceedings and Debates of the House of Common, 29 (1791), 391. The view that the United States Constitution was heavily indebted to their own laws and political conventions remained common among nineteenth century British commentators: see Prochaska Frank, Eminent Victorians on American Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
20. Hulsebosch Daniel, Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005), 4.
21. Foner Eric, Tom Paine and Revolutionary America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 ), 3.
22. Paine Thomas, Common Sense: Addressed to the Inhabitants of America (Philadelphia: R. Bell, 1776), 31–32, 41–42.
23. Foner, Tom Paine, 191; Slauter Eric, The State as a Work of Art: The Cultural Origins of the Constitution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), 39. By the 1790s, Paine, like many American revolutionaries, had become more eager to represent charters as quintessentially ancien regime grants from above, and, therefore, as texts that were utterly distinct from the new constitutions.
24. See Flanagan Marie Therese and Green Judith A, eds. Charters and Charter Scholarship in Britain and Ireland (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005); and for the sometimes creative politics of charters in the seventeenth century, see Halliday Paul, Dismembering the Body Politic: Partisan Politics in England's Towns, 1650–1730 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
25. Tomlins Christopher, Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in Colonizing English America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 157–58.
26. Madison James, Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 Reported by James Madison, with an introduction by Adrienne Koch (New York: Norton, 1987), 3. On both sides of the Atlantic, there has, however, also been a notable concern at intervals to stress the similarities between American and British constitutionalism; see Ian Bruce Mylchreest, “The Anglo-American Dialogue on Constitutionalism, 1860–1920” (PhD diss., Cornell University, 1988).
27. As cited in Parliamentary History of England from the Earliest Period, (London: T.C. Hansard, 1806), vol. 23, 1315.
28. Benjamin Walter, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, trans. Underwood J.A. (London: Penguin Books, 2008), 1–50.
29. Loughran Trish, The Republic in Print: Print Culture in the Age of US Nation-building (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), 21.
30. Fraser, English Opinion of the American Constitution, 55.
31. Palmer, Age of Democratic Revolution, I:263; in Britain, the texts of the state constitutions were extracted in The Constitutions of the Several Independent States of America (London: J. Stockdale, 1782), and in Stokes Anthony, A View of the Constitution of the British Colonies…at the Time the Civil War broke out on the Continent of America (London: B. White, 1783). Both pamphlets appeared in several editions.
32. For a recent survey, see Billias George Athan, American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776–1989: A Global Perspective (New York: New York University Press, 2009).
33. The Republican (London, 1820) IV:229–30; for Carlile's analysis of the Spanish constitution, see ibid., III:11, 46, 88, 119, 164, 188.
34. Times (London), August 16, 1836.
35. Thus Daniel Robinson, a onetime Royal Navy officer who fought with the Spanish army, published his opinions and a translation of the Cadiz constitution in London in 1813, The Political Constitution of the Spanish Monarch proclaimed in Cadiz 19th of March 1812, dedicating it to a fellow British volunteer in Spain, Sir John Downe. For men of this sort and their mixed politics, see Rogers Graciela Iglesias, British Liberators in the Age of Napoleon: Volunteering under the Spanish Flag in the Peninsular War (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).
36. Quoted in Rosen Frederick, Bentham, Byron, and Greece: Constitutionalism, Nationalism, and Early Liberal Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), 124.
37. Racine Karen, “‘This England and this Now’: British Cultural and Intellectual Influence in the Spanish American Independence Era,” Hispanic-American Historical Review 90 (2010): 423–54; and see her “Imagining Independence: London's Spanish-American community, 1790–1829” (PhD diss., Tulane University, 1996).
38. Palmer, Age of Democratic Revolution, I:282. In February 1819, Bolivar urged the Second National Congress of Venezuela to study—without servilely imitating—the British constitution: “a monarchy in system, in which is acknowledged the sovereignty of the People, the division and equilibrium of power, civil freedom, liberty of conscience, and of the press, and every thing that is sublime in politics. A greater degree of liberty cannot be enjoyed in any kind of republic…I recommend that constitution as the best model to those who aspire to the enjoyments of the rights of man.” South American Independence! The Speech of His Excellency Gen. Bolivar (London: G. Young, 1819), 20.
39. Collier Simon, Ideas and Politics of Chilean Independence 1808–1833 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967), 345–46.
40. Some admittedly crude indicators of this can be found by searching Google Books Ngram viewer. This suggests the rarity of the phrase “unwritten constitution” in works published in Britain before 1860, and its widening (though still uneven) use thereafter.
41. Cartwright John, An Appeal on the Subject of the English Constitution (London: J. Johnson, 1797), 15.
42. Ibid., 35; Cartwright John, A Letter to the Duke of Newcastle (London: J. S. Jordan, 1792), 101.
43. Cartwright Frances D., ed. The Life and Correspondence of Major Cartwright, 2 vols., (London: Henry Colburn, 1826) II:389.
44. Ibid., I:361; II:67. For connections between Cartwright and other British radicals and Hispanic exiles, see Simal Juan Luis, Emigrados: España y el exilio internacional, 1814–1834 (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2012).
45. Ibid., II:390.
46. For a recent survey of the range of Bentham's interventions and interests, see Armitage David, “Globalizing Jeremy Bentham,” History of Political Thought 32 (2011): 63–82.
47. See, for example, McKennan T. L., “Jeremy Bentham and the Columbian Liberators,” The Americas 34 (1978): 460–75; and Hume L. J., “Preparations for Civil War in Tripoli in the 1820s: Ali Karamanli, Hassuna D'Ghies and Jeremy Bentham,” Journal of African history 21 (1980): 311–22.
48. That this was also Cartwright's view emerges strongly in his last known work, which appears to survive only in Spanish: Diálogo politico entre un italiano, un español, un frances, un aleman, y un ingles (London: Taylor, 1825). In this imaginary dialogue between European constitutional reformers, the French spokesman is made to describe England (pp.7–8) as “in politics like another Holy Land…from which, with time, the art of government must be diffused to other nations,” and to remark how the United States Constitution “is a stream from that sacred fountain.” I owe this translation to Elena Schneider.
49. Williford Miriam, Jeremy Bentham on Spanish America: An Account of his Letters and Proposals to the New World (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980), 4; for Burr's Mexican schemes, see O.Stewart David, American Emperor (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011).
50. “Junctiana Proposal: Proposals for the Junction of the Two Seas – the Atlantic and the Pacific, by Means of a Joint-Stock company,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols., ed. Bowring John (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843) II:558–68.
51. For some interesting discussions of how, more broadly, the age of revolutions “generated controversial new forms of politics, at once democratic and imperial…anticolonial and centralizing,” see Desan Suzanne, Hunt Lynn, and Max Nelson William, eds. The French Revolution in Global Perspective (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013).
52. Hesse Carla, “Reading in extremis: Revolutionaries respond to Rousseau,” in Walton Charles, ed. Into Print: Limits and Legacies of the Enlightenment: Essays in Honor of Robert Darnton (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011) 145–57.
53. Gourevitch Victor, ed. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), xxii–iii, 41–69.
54. See Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Constitutional Project for Corsica (last updated 2011) http://www.constitution.org/jjr/corsica.htm
55. Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France, and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event (Dublin: W.Watson, etc., 1790), 266.
56. See Woolf Stuart, Napoleon's Integration of Europe (London: Routledge, 1991), 127 and passim; and Broers Michael, Hicks Peter, and Guimera Augustin, eds. The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).
57. Paquette Gabriel, “The Brazilian Origins of the 1826 Portuguese Constitution,” European History Quarterly 41 (2011): 444–71; I am grateful to Professor Sir John Elliott for a copy of his unpublished essay “‘Spaniards of Both Hemispheres’: A Constitution for an Empire.”
58. Edling Max, A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
59. Mann Michael, The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 107; and Frymer Paul, “Building an American Empire: Territorial Expansion in the Antebellum Era,” UC Irvine Law Review, 1 (2011): 913–54.
60. Rana Aziz, The Two Faces of American Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010), 94 and passim.
61. It is also the case that even authoritarian and imperially driven written constitutions could still work to advance certain freedoms, and/or might contain language and provisions that individuals on the receiving end could turn to their own advantage and use. See, for example, Grothe Ewald, “Model or Myth? The Constitution of Westphalia of 1807 and Early German Constitutionalism,” German Studies Review, 28 (2005)1: 1–19.
62. This is despite the fact that, as Pierre Bordieu remarked, “The political field is…the site par excellence in which agents seek to form and transform their visions of the world and thereby the world itself: it is the site par excellence in which words are actions.” Thompson John B., trans. Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 27.
63. See, for example, the arguments of Lemuel D. Nelme in 1772 in support of the power of language and the need for an aggressive propagation of English as a “national way to spread the gospel, by the medium of the BRITISH LANGUAGE, among nations who are now enveloped in darkness”: An Essay Towards an Investigation of the Origin and Elements of Language and Letters (London: T. Spilsbury, 1772), 134.
64. In his Rights of Man (1791–92), Paine described America's new constitutions as being to “liberty what a grammar is to language: they define its parts of speech, and practically construct them into systems”: quoted in Mathias Charles Mc C. Jr., “Ordered Liberty: The Original Intent of the Constitution,” Maryland Law Review 47 (1987): 178.
65. Quoted in Sorenson Janet, The Grammar of Empire in Eighteenth-Century British Writing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 89.
66. Benjamin Rush, quoted in Kammen, A Machine that Would Go of Itself, 398.
67. One aspect of this was the growing use, especially among British conservatives, of the phrase “paper constitution” to re-describe and diminish some written constitutions. The phrase seems to have emerged in the early 1780s, but only to have become widespread in Britain after the outbreak of the French Revolution.
68. Perhaps indicatively, this happened the year after the United States Senate voted to admit “stenographers and note-takers” to its debates; Amer Mildred L., The Congressional Record: Content, History and Issues, (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1993).
69. Hansard Parliamentary Debates, 1st ser., vol. 10 (1812), 990.
70. Crawley Charles W., “French and English Influences in the Cortes of Cadiz, 1810–1814,” Cambridge Historical Journal 6 (1939): 193.
71. Hansard Parliamentary Debates, 3rd ser., vol. 7 (1831), 411; vol. 9 (1831), 490–91.
72. Lynch John, Simon Bolivar: A Life (London: Yale University Press, 2007), 202–3.
73. Tremenheere Hugh Seymour, The Constitution of the United States Compared to our Own (London: John Murray, 1854), x.
74. For the text of the New Ireland constitution, see Horst Dippel, ed. Constitutions of the World from the Late 18th Century to the Middle of the 19th Century Section 2, Part V, 9–12. <http://www.modern-constitutions.de/>
75. Ricotti Carlo, “Il costituzionalismo britannico nel Mediterraneo (1794–1818),” Clio 27 (1991): 365–451.
76. The vital raw material for this is Madden Frederick, Fieldhouse David, and Darwin John, eds. Select Documents on the Constitutional History of the British Empire and Commonwealth (New York: Greenwood Press, 8 vols, 1985–2000). The Whig member of Parliament and dramatist Richard Brinsley Sheridan and some other Irish and British political actors pointedly accused London of imitating, by the Act of Union of 1800–1801, French revolutionary zeal to impose new written constitutions on satellite states.
77. I will be developing these points and arguments in a future book provisionally entitled WordPower: Writing Constitutions and Making Empires.
78. Adelman Jeremy, “An Age of Imperial Revolutions,” American Historical Review 113 (2008): 337.
79. Quoted in Heydemann Günther, Konstitution gegen Revolution: die britische Deutschland- und italienpolitik 1815–1848 (Gottingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1995), 66, 81.
80. Taylor Miles, “The 1848 Revolutions and the British Empire,” Past and Present 166 (2000): 152.
81. The use of written constitutions to control and indoctrinate fast-moving and expanding pioneer populations was widely canvassed by mid-nineteenth century American and British writers. In 1848, for example, Frederick Grimké, a former Ohio Supreme Court judge, remarked how “the introduction of the most enlightened institutions and laws into the western states, at the earliest possible stage, keeps the minds of men in one track, and trains the whole population to the same habits and manners as prevail among the oldest members of the confederacy. It is the most striking instance I am aware of, of the immense control which the political institutions may be made to have upon the social organization.” Considerations Upon the Nature and Tendency of Free Institutions (Cincinnati: H. W. Derby & Co., 1848), 486.
82. For a recent survey, see Cochrane Peter, Colonial Ambition: Foundations of Australian Democracy (Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press, 2006).
83. Dunmore Lang John, Freedom and Independence for the Golden Lands of Australia (Sydney: n.p., 1857), 339, 349. A searching biography that will situate Lang and his fellow Australian activists in transnational contexts is badly needed.
Earlier versions of this article were delivered to audiences at the Institute of the Americas, University of London, the European Institute in Florence, and the University of Virginia's Legal History Workshop. The author is grateful for the helpful comments made on those occasions; for the close readings of earlier drafts by Dirk Hartog, David Bell, Sara Brooks, Peter Marshall, and the Law & History reviewers; and for Samuel Lazerwitz's assistance with the final manuscript.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.