Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Accatino, Daniela and Collins, Cath 2016. Truth, Evidence, Truth: The Deployment of Testimony, Archives and Technical Data in Domestic Human Rights Trials. Journal of Human Rights Practice, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 81.


Judicial “Truth” and Historical “Truth”: The Case of the Ardeatine Caves Massacre


It is frequently claimed that adjudication before a court of law and historical adjudication are two entirely different tasks. The methods and techniques employed by judges and historians contrast sharply. The judge faces many constraints, in terms of choice of subject matter, the arguments to be considered, the evidence to be evaluated, the procedural steps to be followed, the substantive rules to be applied, and the time available to reach a decision; historians, by contrast, are relatively free to choose their field of research, manage their own time, gather the evidence, evaluate it, decide when findings are ready to be published, and reexamine them.

Corresponding author;
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Yan Thomas, “La vérité, le temps, le juge et l'historien,Le Débat 102 (1998): 1736

Annette Wieviorka, “Justice, Histoire et Mémoire. De Nuremberg à Jérusalem,Droit et société 38 (1998): 5967.

Elena Maculan, “Prosecuting International Crimes at National Level, Lessons from the Argentine ‘Truth-Finding Trials’,Utrecht Law Review 8 (2012): 106–21

Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule, “Reparations for Slavery and Other Historical Injustices,Columbia Law Review 103 (2003): 689747.

Richard J. Evans, “History, Memory and the Law: The Historian as Expert Witness,History and Theory 41 (2002): 326–45

Dominique Damamme and Marie-Claire Lavabre, “Les historiens dans l'espace public,Sociétés Contemporaines 39 (2000): 5, 1016.

Emmanuel Cartier, “Histoire et droit: rivalité ou complementarité?,Revue française de Droit constitutionnel 67 (2006): 509, 516.

Ludovic Hennebel and Thomas Hochmann, ed., Genocide Denial and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)

Robert Kahn, Holocaust Denial and the Law. A Comparative Study (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004).

Luigi Cajani, “Criminal Laws on History: The Case of the European Union,Historein 11 (2011): 1940

Pierre Nora, “History, Memory and the Law in France, 1990–2010,Historein 11 (2011): 1013

Jean-Clément Martin, “La démarche historique face à la vérité judiciaire. Juges et historiens,Droit et société 38 (1998): 13, 1617

Wolfgang Benz, “Holocaust Denial: Anti-Semitism as a Refusal to Accept Reality,Historein 11 (2011): 6978.

Gunther Teubner, ed., Juridification of Social Spheres. A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1987)

Ardeatine Caves,” in The Oxford Companion to World War II, ed. Ian C.B. Dear (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 38.

Philip Sutter, “The Continuing Role for Belligerent Reprisals,Journal of Conflict & Security Law 13 (2008): 93122

Felix Nikolaus Bohr, “Flucht aus Rom. Das spektakuläre Ende des ‘Falles Kappler’ im August 1977,Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 60 (2012): 111–41.

Rebecca Clifford, “The Limits of National Memory: Anti-Fascism, The Holocaust and the Fosse Ardeatine Memorial in 1990s Italy,Forum for Modern Language Studies 44 (2008): 128–39

Richard Hyland, Gifts. A Study in Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 69.

Jon Elster, Closing the Books. Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 79135

Marina Cattaruzza, “How Much Does Historical Truth Still Matter?,Historein 11 (2011): 4955.

Jean-Pierre Le Crom, “Juger l'histoire,Droit et société, 38 (1998): 37.

Bernard Edelman, “L'office du juge et l'histoire,Droit et société 38 (1998), 52.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law and History Review
  • ISSN: 0738-2480
  • EISSN: 1939-9022
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *