Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Searching for Anglo-American Digital Legal History

Abstract

As the fields of digital humanities and digital history have grown in scale and visibility since the 1990s, legal history has largely remained on the margins of those fields. The move to make material available online in the first decade of the web featured only a small number of legal history projects: Famous Trials; Anglo-American Legal Tradition; The Proceedings of the Old Bailey Online, 1674–1913. Early efforts to construct hypertext narratives and scholarship also included some works of legal history: “Hearsay of the Sun: Photography, Identity and the Law of Evidence in Nineteenth-Century Courts,” in Hypertext Scholarship in American Studies; Who Killed William Robinson? and Gilded Age Plains City: The Great Sheedy Murder Trial and the Booster Ethos of Lincoln, Nebraska. In the second decade of the web, the focus shifted from distributing material to exploring it using digital tools. The presence of digital history grew at the meetings of organizations of historians ranging from the American Historical Association to the Urban History Association, but not at the American Society for Legal History conferences, the annual meetings of the Law and Society Association, or the British Legal History Conference. Only a few Anglo-American legal historians took up computational tools for sorting and visualizing sources such as data mining, text mining, and topic modeling; network analysis; and mapping. Paul Craven and Douglas Hay's Master and Servant project text mined a comprehensive database of 2,000 statutes and 1,200,000 words to explore similarities and influence among statutes. Data Mining with Criminal Intent mined and visualized the words in trial records using structured data from The Proceedings of the Old Bailey Online, 1674–1913. Locating London's Past, a project that mapped resources relating to the early modern and eighteenth century city, and also made use of the Old Bailey records. Digital Harlem mapped crime in the context of everyday life in the 1920s. Only in the past few years has more digital legal history using computational tools begun to appear, and like many of the projects discussed in this special issue, most remain at a preliminary stage. This article seeks to bring into focus the constraints, possibilities, and choices that shape digital legal history, in order to create a context for the work in this special issue, and to promote discussion of what it means to do legal history in the digital age.

Copyright
Corresponding author
srober30@gmu.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Daniel J. Cohen , “History and the Second Decade of the Web,Rethinking History 8 (2004): 295

Paul Craven and William Traves , “A General-Purpose Hierarchical Coding Engine and its Application to Comparative Analysis of Statutes,Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (1993): 2732

Paul Craven and Douglas Hay , “Computer Applications in Comparative History: The Master & Servant Project at York University (Canada),History and Computing 7 (1995): 6980

Lara Putnam , “The Transnational and the Text-Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows They Cast,American Historical Review 121 (2016): 390

Alexandra Chassanoff , “Historians and the Use of Primary Sources in the Digital Age,The American Archivist 76 (2013): 458–80

Ted Underwood , “Theorizing Research Practices We Forgot to Theorize Twenty Years Ago,Representations 127 (2014): 65

Eric Nystrom and David Tanenhaus , “The Future of Digital Legal History: No Magic, No Silver Bullets,American Journal of Legal History 56 (2016): 158

Roy Rosenzweig , “Scarcity or Abundance? Preserving the Past in a Digital Era,American Historical Review 108 (2003): 760

Lauren Klein , Jacob Eisenstein , and Iris Sun , “Exploratory Thematic Analysis for Digitized Archival Collections,Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30, Supplement 1 (2015): 131

Stephen Robertson , “Digital Mapping as a Research Tool: Digital Harlem: Everyday Life, 1915–1930,American Historical Review 121 (2016): 156–66

Cameron Blevins , “Space, Nation, and the Triumph of Region: A View of the World from Houston,Journal of American History 101 (2014): 122–47

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law and History Review
  • ISSN: 0738-2480
  • EISSN: 1939-9022
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 71 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 374 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th September 2016 - 24th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.