Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-5zjcf Total loading time: 0.42 Render date: 2022-08-11T16:13:59.315Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China's Criminal Procedure Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article employs a new framework for legal change, the recursivity of law, to explain why China's criminal procedure law has cycled through numerous reforms between 1979 and 2008 without improving the conditions of lawyers' criminal defense work. The authors argue that Chinese lawyers' difficulties in criminal defense have deep roots in the recursive nature of the criminal procedure reforms. In particular, those difficulties were produced by interactions of the four mechanisms of recursivity (indeterminacy of law, contradictions, diagnostic struggles, and actor mismatch) in both lawmaking and implementation. The empirical analysis shows that these mechanisms are linked in pairs and in sequence. This logic of change offers an integrated interdisciplinary approach to the enactment and implementation of law in other times, places, and areas of law.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
All‐China Lawyers Association. 2002. Quanguo Lüxie Weiquan Gongzuo Baogao [Report on the right protection work of the ACLA]. May 14. http://www.acla.org.cn (accessed on July 3, 2009).Google Scholar
Biddulph, Sarah. 2007. Legal Reform and Administrative Detention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakken, B⊘rge, ed. 2005. Crime, Punishment, and Policing in China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, Dingjian. 1999. Lishi yu Biange: Xin Zhongguo Fazhi Jianshe de Licheng [History and change: the process of the construction of legal system in new China ]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce G., and Halliday, Terence C. 1998. Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce G., and Halliday, Terence C. 2006. Negotiating Globalization: Global Templates and the Construction of Insolvency Regimes in East Asia. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (3): 521–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambliss, William J., and Zatz, Marjorie S., eds. 1993. Making Law: The State, the Law, and Structural Contradictions. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Guangzhong. 1995. Lun Xingshi Susong Fa Xiugai de Zhidao Sixiang [On the guiding thoughts of the criminal procedure law revision. Fazhi yu Shehui Fazhan [Law and Social Development 1995 (4): 4349.Google Scholar
Chen, Guangzhong. 1996. Xingshi Susong Fa Xiugai de Guocheng yu Zhuyao Neirong [An overview of the process and content of the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law. Introduction to Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Xingshi Susong Fa Shiyi yu Yingyong [The interpretation and application of the PRC Criminal Procedure Law ]. Jilin: Jilin People's Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Guangzhong, and Duan, Yan, eds. 1995. Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Xingshi Susong Fa Xiugai Jianyi Gao yu Lunzheng [The suggested draft of the PRC Criminal Procedure Law and its reasoning ]. Beijing: China Fang Zheng Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Jianfu. 2002. A Criminal Justice System for a New Millennium? In China's Legal Reforms and Their Political Limits, ed. Vermeer, Eduard B. and D'Hooghe, Ingrid, 77122. Richmond, UK: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Donald C., and Feinerman, James V. 1995. Antagonistic Contradictions: Criminal Law and Human Rights in China. China Quarterly 141:135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth, and Cook, James M. 1999. Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology 25:441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jerome A. 1968. The Criminal Process in the People's Republic of China, 1949–1963. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Min. 1995. Xingshi Susongfa Xiugai Yantao zhong de Ruogan Zhengyi Wenti [Several debated issues during the discussions on the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law. Gongan Daxue Xuebao [Police University Academic Journal 1995 (3): 6469.Google Scholar
Cui, Min. 1996. Zhongguo Xingshi Susong Fa de Xin Fazhan—Xingshi Susong Fa Xiugai Yantao de Quanmian Huigu. [The new development of China's Criminal Procedure Law—a comprehensive review of the discussions on the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law.] Beijing: People's Police University of China Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48:147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1991. Introduction to The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., 142. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Michael. 1992. Policing and Punishment in China: From Patriarchy to “The People.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Peng. 2005. Cong Lüshi Weiquan An Lun Xingshi Lüshi Banan Fengxian de Bimian [An essay on the avoidance of criminal defense lawyers' professional risks from lawyers' right protection cases]. Peking University School of Law. Unpublished, manuscript in authors' possession.Google Scholar
Folsom, Ralph H., Minan, John H., and Otto, Lee Ann. 1992. Law and Politics in the People's Republic of China. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fu, H. L. 1998. Criminal Defence in China: The Possible Impact of the 1996 Criminal Procedure Law Reform. China Quarterly 153:3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Grattet, Ryken. 1993. Structural Contradictions and the Production of New Legal Institutions: The Transformation of Industrial Accident Law Revisited. In Making Law: The State, the Law, and Structural Contradictions, ed. Chambliss, William J. and Zatz, Marjorie S., 404–20. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. Forthcoming. Recursivity in Global Normmaking: A Sociolegal Agenda. Annual Review of Law and Social Science.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm‐Making and National Law‐Making in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 111:1135–202.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Karpik, Lucien, eds. 1997. Politics Matter: A Comparative Theory of Lawyers in the Making of Political Liberalism. In Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North American from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries, 1564. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Liu, Sida. 2007. Birth of a Liberal Moment? Looking through a One‐Way Mirror at Lawyers' Defense of Criminal Defendants in China. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., 65107. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Osinsky, Pavel. 2006. Globalization of Law. Annual Review of Sociology 32:447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, John W., and Wang, Yanping. 2005. Law Codes in Dynastic China: A Synopsis of Chinese Legal History in the Thirty Centuries from Zhou to Qing. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights in China. 2001. Empty Promises: Human Rights Protection and China's Criminal Procedure Law in Practice. New York: Human Rights in China.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2008. Walking on Thin Ice: Control, Intimidation, and Harassment of Lawyers in China. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Morris, ed. 1966 W. I. Thomas on Social Organization and Social Personality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Addison‐Wesley.Google Scholar
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. 1993. Criminal Justice with Chinese Characteristics: China's Criminal Process and Violations of Human Rights. New York: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. 1998. Wrongs and Rights: A Human Rights Analysis of China's Revised Criminal Law. New York: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Leng, Shao‐chuan. 1985. Criminal Justice in Post‐Mao China: Analysis and Documents. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2006. Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (1): 75106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2008. Shiluo de Chengbang: Dangdai Zhongguo Falü Zhiye Bianqian [The lost polis: transformation of the legal profession in contemporary China ]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Carlos Wing‐hung. 1995. China's Legal Awakening: Legal Theory and Criminal Justice in Deng's Era. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Hong, and Miethe, Terence D. 2002. Legal Representation and Criminal Processing in China. British Journal of Criminology 42:267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubman, Stanley. 1999. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luo, Wei. 2000. The Amended Criminal Procedure Law and the Criminal Court Rules of the People's Republic of China. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein and Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Mertha, Andrew C. 2005. The Politics of Piracy: Intellectual Property in Contemporary China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2003. Unhooking from the state: Chinese lawyers in transition. PhD diss., Department of Sociology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2007. Lawyers, Political Embeddedness, and Institutional Continuity in China's Transition from Socialist. American Journal of Sociology 113:352414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngok, King‐lun. 2002. Law‐Making and China's Market Transition—Legislative Activism at the Eighth National People's Congress. Problems of Post-Communism 49:2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin J. 1990. Reform Without Liberalization: China's National People's Congress and the Politics of Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, Katharina, and Xu, Chenggang. 2003. Incomplete Law—A Conceptual and Analytical Framework and Its Application to the Evolution of Financial Market Regulation. Journal of International Law and Politics 35:9311013.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 2001. The Chinese Legal System: Globalization and Local Legal Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sheng, Yi. 2003. A Promise Unfulfilled: The Impact of China's 1996 Criminal‐Procedure Reform on China's Criminal Defense Lawyers' Role at the Pretrial Stage (Part 1). Perspectives 4 (4): 118.Google Scholar
Sheng, Yi. 2004. A Promise Unfulfilled: The Impact of China's 1996 Criminal‐Procedure Reform on China's Criminal Defense Lawyers' Role at the Pretrial Stage (Part 2). Perspectives 5 (1): 127.Google Scholar
Shirk, Susan. 2007. China: Fragile Superpower. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2005. Advanced Political Economies. Introduction to Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, 139. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R. 2001. Law/Society: Origins, Interactions, and Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, Harold M. 1999. Strike Hard! Anti‐Crime Campaigns and Chinese Criminal Justice, 1979–1985. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University East Asia Program.Google Scholar
Tanner, Murray Scot. 1999. The Politics of Lawmaking in Post‐Mao China: Institutions, Processes and Democratic Prospects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevaskes, Sue. 2007. Courts and Criminal Justice in Contemporary China. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wang, Celai. 1993. Wanshan Xingshi Susong Lifa Yanjiu [Research on the perfection of the criminal procedure legislation ]. Beijng: People's Police University of China Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Gong. 2001. Zhongguo Lüshi Shean Shilu [Records of cases involving Chinese lawyers ]. Beijing: Qunzhong Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Gong. 2003. Wei Zhongguo Lüshi Kangbian [Defending for Chinese lawyers ]. Beijing: Democracy and Construction Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Dali L. 2004. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yu, Ping. 2002. Glittery Promise vs. Dismal Reality: The Role of a Criminal Lawyer in the People's Republic of China after the 1996 Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 35:827–65.Google Scholar
Beijing Lüshi[Beijing Lawyers]Google Scholar
Gong'an Yanjiu[Policing Studies]Google Scholar
Jiancha Ribao[Procuratorial Daily]Google Scholar
Renmin Fayuan Bao[People's Court News]Google Scholar
Renmin Gongan[People's Police]Google Scholar
Renmin Jiancha[People's Procuratorial Monthly]Google Scholar
Renmin Ribao[People's Daily]Google Scholar
Renmin Sifa[People's Judiciary]Google Scholar
Zhengzhi yu Falü[Politics and Law]Google Scholar
Zhongguo Faxue[China Legal Science]Google Scholar
Zhongguo Lüshi[Chinese Lawyers]Google Scholar
Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. 1985. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp50.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. 1990. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp44.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment. 1988. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp36.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials. 1979. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp42.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. 1984. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_comp38.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_ccpr.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. 1966. http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm (accessed July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
43
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China's Criminal Procedure Law
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China's Criminal Procedure Law
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China's Criminal Procedure Law
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *