Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:35:29.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For Both Love and Money: Viviana Zelizer's The Purchase of Intimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Martha M. Ertman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Viviana Zelizer's recent book, The Purchase of Intimacy (2005), presents an innovative theory of how social and legal actors negotiate rights and obligations when money changes hands in intimate relationships—a perspective that could change how we understand many things, from valuations of homemaking labor to the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund. This essay describes Zelizer's critique of the reductionist “Hostile Worlds” and “Nothing But” approaches to economic exchange in intimate relationships and then explains her more three‐dimensional approach, “Connected Lives.” While Zelizer focuses on family law, the essay goes beyond that context, extending Zelizer's approach to transfers of genetic material and concluding that her approach could point toward a more equitable resolution of disputes in and about these markets.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Fall 2009 , pp. 1017 - 1037
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom. 1996. On the Genealogy of Moral Hazard. Texas Law Review 75 (2): 237–92.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom. 2001. Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort in Action. Law & Society Review 35 (2): 275–320.Google Scholar
Barry, Kathleen. 1995. The Prostitution of Sexuality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Joyce. 2002. Note. To Pay or Not to Pay, That Is the Question: Finding an Intermediary Solution Along the Moore Spectrum. Journal of Medicine & Law 7 (1): 55–78.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
Buxton, Julia. 2006. The Political Economy of Narcotics: Production, Consumption and Global Markets. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Ann. 2005. Pets or Meat. Chicago-Kent Law Review 80 (3): 1129–50.Google Scholar
Cohen, Glenn. 2003. Note. The Price of Everything, The Value of Nothing: Reframing the Commodification Debate. Harvard Law Review 117 (2): 689–710.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lloyd. 1987. Marriage, Divorce, and Quasi Rents: “I Gave Him the Best Years of My Life.” Journal of Legal Studies 16 (2): 267–303.Google Scholar
Coven, Martha B. 2002. The Freedom to Spend: The Case for Cash‐Based Public Assistance. Minnesota Law Review 86 (4): 847–911.Google Scholar
Dolgin, Janet L. 1997. The Fate of Childhood: Legal Models of Children and the Parent‐Child Relationship. Albany Law Review 61 (2): 345–431.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2005. For Love or Money. New York Times, September 18, section 7, 23.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 1998. Commercializing Marriage: A Proposal for Valuing Women's Work through Premarital Security Agreements. Texas Law Review 77 (1): 17–112.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 2003. What's Wrong with a Parenthood Market? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification. North Carolina Law Review 82 (1): 1–59.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 2007. Mapping the New Frontiers of Private Ordering: Afterword. Arizona Law Review 49 (3): 695–715.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M., and Williams, Joan C., eds. 2005. Introduction. In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. A History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1989. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Michele. 2006. Formalism and the Legal Status of Body Parts. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2006 (1): 316–88.Google Scholar
Hasday, Jill Elaine. 2005. Intimacy and Economic Exchange. Harvard Law Review 119 (2): 491–530.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Linda R., and Larson, Jane E. 1998. Hard Bargains: The Politics of Sex. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Jonathan. 2000. Biotechnology and the Legal Constitution of the Self: Managing Identity in Science, the Market, and Society. Hastings Law Journal 51 (5): 909–52.Google Scholar
Landes, Elisabeth M., and Posner, Richard A. 1978. The Economics of the Baby Shortage. Journal of Legal Studies 7 (2): 323–48.Google Scholar
MasterCard. n.d. Priceless: “Catch.” http://www.priceless.com/us/personal/en/pricelesstv/index.html (accessed October 24, 2008).Google Scholar
Musto, David F. 1973. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1998. “Whether from Reason or Prejudice”: Taking Money for Bodily Services. Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2): 693–724.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1992. Sex and Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Query, Julia, Montoya, John, and Funari, Vicky. 2000. Live Nude Girls Unite! DVD, written and directed by Julie Query and Vicky Funari. Brooklyn, NY: First Run/Icarus Films.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1987. Market Inalienability. Harvard Law Review 100:1849–937.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1996. Contested Commodities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, Radhika. 2000. Property, Privacy, and the Human Body. Boston University Law Review 80 (2): 359–460.Google Scholar
Rao, Radhika. 2007. Genes and Spleens: Property, Contract or Privacy Rights in the Human Body? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35:371–80.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Janette. 2005. Coca‐Collector. Virginian-Pilot, June 1, E4.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1992. Giving, Trading, Thieving, Trusting. Florida Law Review 44:295–317.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1994. Rhetoric and Romance: A Comment on Spouses and Strangers . Georgetown Law Journal 82 (7): 2409–21.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1998. What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Reprinted in Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, ed. Ertman, Martha M. and Williams, Joan C., 122–27. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol. 2007. Developing Markets in Baby Making: In the Matter of Baby M . Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 30 (1): 67–97.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 1994. The Modernization of Marital Status Law: Adjudicating Wives' Right to Earnings, 1860–1930. Georgetown Law Journal 82 (7): 2127–211.Google Scholar
Silbaugh, Katharine. 1997. Commodification of Women's Household Labor. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 9:81–121.Google Scholar
Skloot, Rebecca. 2006. Taking the Least of You. New York Times Magazine, April 16, 38.Google Scholar
Staudt, Nancy C. 1996. Taxing Housework. Georgetown Law Journal 84 (5): 1571–647.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. 1999. Beyond Moral Hazard: Insurance as Moral Opportunity. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 6 (1): 11–46.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass A. 1997. Free Markets and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan C., and Zelizer, Viviana A. 2005. To Commodify or Not to Commodify: That Is Not the Question. In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, ed. Ertman, Martha M. and Williams, Joan C., 362–82. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. 1979. Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. 1985. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. 2000. The Purchase of Intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry 25 (1): 817–42.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Borelli v. Brusseau, 16 Cal. Rptr. 2d 16 (Ct. App. 1993).Google Scholar
Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital, 264 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (S.D. Fla. 2003).Google Scholar
In re Baby M, 537 A.2d 1227 (N.J. 1988).Google Scholar
Marvin v. Marvin, 557 P.2d 106 (Cal. 1976).Google Scholar
Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990).Google Scholar
Smith v. Knoller, No. 319532 (Cal. Super. Ct. Aug. 9, 2001).Google Scholar