Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T07:31:41.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Accountability in the Service‐Based Welfare State: Lessons from Child Welfare Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kathleen G. Noonan ,
Charles F. Sabel  and
William H. Simon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current trends intensify the longstanding problem of how the rule of law should be institutionalized in the welfare state. Welfare programs are being redesigned to increase their capacities to adapt to rapidly changing conditions and to tailor their responses to diverse clienteles. These developments challenge the understanding of legal accountability developed in the Warren Court era. This article reports on an emerging model of accountable administration that strives to reconcile programmatic flexibility with rule‐of‐law values. The model has been developed in the reform of state child protective services systems, but it has potentially broad application to public law. It also has novel implications for such basic rule‐of‐law issues as the choice between rules and standards, the relation of bureaucratic and judicial control, the proper scope of judicial intervention into dysfunctional public agencies, and the justiciability of “positive” (or social and economic) rights.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , Summer 2009 , pp. 523 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

ABA Center on Children and the Law. 2005. Child Welfare Consent Decrees: Analysis of Thirty‐Five Court Actions from 1995 to 2005. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit. 2007. Inside the Machine: Toward a New Development Economics. March/April, Boston Review.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth. 1999. Nobody's Children: Abused Children, Foster Drift, and the Adoption Alternative. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. 1998. Making Child Welfare Work: How the R. C. Lawsuit Forged New Partnerships to Protect Children and Sustain Families. Washington, DC: Bazelon Center on Mental Health Law.Google Scholar
Center for the Study of Social Policy. 2003. Improving the Performance and Outcomes of Child Welfare Through State Improvement Plans (PIPs). http://www.cssp.org/uploadFiles/2515_CSSP_FINAL.pdf (accessed July 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram. 1976. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review 89:1281–316.Google Scholar
Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group. n.d. (a). Implementation of Alabama's R. C. Consent Decree: Creating a New Culture of Practice. http://www.childwelfaregroup.org/documents/AL_RC_Implementation.pdf (accessed February 22, 2009).Google Scholar
Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group. n.d. (b). The Qualitative Service Review Process. http://www.hspolicy.utah.gov/dcfs/ (accessed July 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Christian, Steve. 2001. Child and Family Services Reviews. NCSL State Legislative Report. National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/cyf/slr265.htm (accessed February 1, 2009).Google Scholar
Costin, Lela B., Karger, Howard Jacob, and Stoesz, David. 1996. The Politics of Child Abuse in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crosby, Philip B. 1984. Quality Without Tears. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Dennis, Michael J., and Stewart, David P. 2004. Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. American Journal of International Law 98:462–515.Google Scholar
Dodge, Kenneth, Kupersmidt, Janis, and Fontaine, Reid. n.d. Willie M.: A Legacy of Legal, Social, and Policy Change. Durham, NC: Duke University (Center for Child and Family Policy).Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael, and Sabel, Charles. 1998. A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review 98:267–473.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren, Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard. 1999. The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth. American Journal of Sociology 105:506–54.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1978. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 92:358–409.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha. 1987. Child Welfare Decisionmaking: In Search of the Least Drastic Alternative. Georgetown Law Journal 75:1745–828.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha. 2005. Reforming Child Protection: A Public Health Perspective. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law 12:590–637.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Martin. 2005. What's Wrong With Children's Rights? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office. 2003. Most States Are Developing Statewide Information Systems, but Reliability of Child Welfare Data Could Be Improved (GAO 03‐809, July). Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1986. The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community, Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel. 2004. Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Europe: The Paradox of Inclusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, Chris. 1994. Making It Work: Implementation of Court Orders Requiring Restructuring of State Executive Branch Agencies. In Child Parent, and State: Law and Policy Reader, ed. Humm, S. Randall, 224–36. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. 1999. Accountability, New Public Management, and the Problems of the Child Support Agency. Journal of Law and Society 26:150–74.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Human Systems and Outcomes. 2005. Quality Service Review: Protocol for Use by Certified Reviewers. In authors' possession.Google Scholar
Huntington, Clare. 2006. Rights Myopia in Child Welfare. UCLA Law Review 53:637–700.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert S., and Norton, David P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1984. Bureaucratic Disentitlement in Social Welfare Programs. Social Service Review 58:3–27.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael, and Smith, Steven Rathgeb. 1989. Nonprofit Organization, Government, and the Welfare State. Political Science Quarterly 104:625–48.Google Scholar
Lowry, Marcia. 1999-2000. Foster Care and Adoption Reform Litigation: Implementing the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary 14:447–56.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. 1974. The Management Side of Due Process: Some Theoretical and Litigation Notes on the Assurance of Accuracy, Fairness, and Timeliness in the Adjudication of Social Welfare Claims. Cornell Law Review 59:772–824.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. 2006. Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance. In Public Accountability: Designs Dilemmas, Experiences, ed. Dowdle, Michael, 115–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28:16–79.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Munson, Carlton, 1979. Supervision in Social Work: Classic Statements and Theoretical Issues. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement. 2007. Comments on the Second Round … An Interview with Jerry Milner, Senior Child Welfare Specialist. http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/helpkids/rcpdfs/cwmatters5.pdf (accessed March 11, 2009).Google Scholar
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. 2003. The Trouble with Child and Family Services Reviews. http://www.nccpr.org (accessed July 1, 2008).Google Scholar
National Economic and Social Development Office. 2005. The Developmental Welfare State. Dublin: National Economic and Social Development Office.Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Children and Families. 2004a. A New Beginning: The Future of Child Welfare in New Jersey. July 9. http://www.state.nj.us/humanservices/CWA/A%20New%20Begining/A_New_Begining.pdf (accessed July 1, 2008).Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Children and Families. 2004b. Enforceable Elements of the New Jersey Child Welfare Plan. July 19. On file with authors.Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Children and Families. 2005. New Jersey Period I Monitoring Report, February. http://cssp.org/uploadFiles/Final_NJ_Monitoring_Report_02_23_07.pdf (accessed March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Children and Families. 2008. New Jersey Period III Monitoring Report, April 16. http://www.cssp.org/uploadFiles/FINAL%20NJ%20REPORT%20Apr%202008.pdf (accessed March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Platt, Anthony. 1977. The Child Savers, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramji‐Nogales, Jaya, Schoenholtz, Andrew, and Schrag, Philip. 2008. Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication. Stanford Law Review 60:295–411.Google Scholar
Roberts, Albert R., and Yeager, Kenneth A. 2006. Foundations of Evidence‐Based Social Work Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Catherine. 2003. The Tyranny of Time: Vulnerable Children, Bad Mothers, and Statutory Deadlines in Parental Termination Proceedings. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law 11:176–228.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 1995. Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. In Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. Smelser, Neil and Swedberg, Richard, 135–65. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H. 2004. Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds. Harvard Law Review 117:1015–101.Google Scholar
Sandler, Ross, and Schoenbrod, David. 2003. Democracy by Decree. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1984. Legality, Bureaucracy, and Class in the Welfare System. Yale Law Journal 92:1198–269.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2006. Toyota Jurisprudence: Legal Theory and Rolling Rule Regimes. In Law and New Governance in the EU and the US, ed. De Burca, Grainne and Scott, Joanne, 37–64. Oxford: Hart Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Stack, Barbara White. 2005. Law to Increase Adoptions Results in More Orphans. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 3. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/206256_orphans03.html (page no longer active).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2000. Deliberative Trouble: Why Groups Go to Extremes. Yale Law Journal 110:71–120.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, ed. 1986. After Legal Instrumentalism?: Strategic Models of Post‐Regulatory Law. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, 305–13. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2003. Social Rights and the Forms of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review 82:1895–920.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families, Comprehensive Family Assessment Process. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/family_assessment/fa4.htm (accessed March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Utah Division of Child and Family Services. n.d. Practice Guidelines and Rules. http://www.hspolicy.utah.gov/dcfs/ (accessed July 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Utah Division of Child and Family Services. 1999. The Milestone Performance Plan. http://www.hsdcfs.utah.gov/PDF/milestone.pdf (March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Utah Division of Child and Family Services. 2004. Case Process Review Questions—2004. Not published. In authors' possession.Google Scholar
Utah Division of Child and Family Services. 2006a. Quality Case Review: Northern Region. Not published. In authors' possession.Google Scholar
Utah Division of Child and Family Services. 2006b. Quality Case Review: Salt Lake City Region. Not published. In authors' possession.Google Scholar
Utah Division of Child and Family Services. 2006c. Quality Case Review: Western Region. Not published. In authors' possession.Google Scholar
Wald, Michael S., Carlsmith, J. M., and Liederman, P. H. 1988. Protecting Abused and Neglected Children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1968. Varieties of Police Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Charlie H. V. Whitman, 83 F. Supp. 2d 476, 483–84 (D.N.J. 2000).Google Scholar
David C. v. Huntsman, Civil No. 2:93‐CV‐00206TC (D. Utah), Agreement to Terminate Lawsuit, May 11, 2007.Google Scholar
David C. v. Leavitt, 13 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (D. Utah 1998).Google Scholar
DeShaney v. Winnebago Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989).Google Scholar
G. L. v. Stangler, 873 F. Supp. 252 (D. Mo. 1994).Google Scholar
G. L. v. Zumwalt, 564 F. Supp. 1030 (W.D. Mo. 1983).Google Scholar
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).Google Scholar
Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458 (1983).Google Scholar
Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
R. C. v. Walley, 2007 WL 118101 (M.D. Ala. 2007).Google Scholar
R. C. v. Walley, Civil No. 88‐H‐1170‐N (M.D. Ala.). Consent Decree. June 5, 1991.Google Scholar
R. C. v. Walley Consent Decree: Monitor's Report to the Court in Response to Court's Order Directing the Monitor to Conduct On‐Site Reviews, n.d.Google Scholar
Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367 (1992).Google Scholar
Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (1992).Google Scholar
Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982).Google Scholar
Charlie H. V. Whitman, 83 F. Supp. 2d 476, 483–84 (D.N.J. 2000).Google Scholar
David C. v. Huntsman, Civil No. 2:93‐CV‐00206TC (D. Utah), Agreement to Terminate Lawsuit, May 11, 2007.Google Scholar
David C. v. Leavitt, 13 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (D. Utah 1998).Google Scholar
DeShaney v. Winnebago Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989).Google Scholar
G. L. v. Stangler, 873 F. Supp. 252 (D. Mo. 1994).Google Scholar
G. L. v. Zumwalt, 564 F. Supp. 1030 (W.D. Mo. 1983).Google Scholar
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).Google Scholar
Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458 (1983).Google Scholar
Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
R. C. v. Walley, 2007 WL 118101 (M.D. Ala. 2007).Google Scholar
R. C. v. Walley, Civil No. 88‐H‐1170‐N (M.D. Ala.). Consent Decree. June 5, 1991.Google Scholar
R. C. v. Walley Consent Decree: Monitor's Report to the Court in Response to Court's Order Directing the Monitor to Conduct On‐Site Reviews, n.d.Google Scholar
Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367 (1992).Google Scholar
Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (1992).Google Scholar
Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982).Google Scholar

South Africa

Minister of Health v. Treatment Action Campaign, 2002 (5) SALR 721 (CC) (S.Afr.).Google Scholar
South Africa v. Grootboom, 2000 (11) BCLR 1169 (CC) (S. Afr.).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA); Pub. L. No. 105–89 (1997), 42 U.S.C. section 1305 et seq.Google Scholar
Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act; Pub. L. No. 96–272 (1980), 42 U.S.C. section 670 et seq.Google Scholar
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act; 42 U.S.C. section 5101 (1974), 42 U.S.C. section 5101 et seq.Google Scholar
Rehabilitation Act; Pub. L. No. 93–112 (1973), 29 U.S.C. section 791.Google Scholar
Social Security Act; Pub.L. No. 74–271 (1935), 42 U.S.C. section 301 et seq.Google Scholar