Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:53:31.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The New Trial by Ordeal: Rape Kits, Police Practices, and the Unintended Effects of Policy Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

One of the most highly touted improvements in the criminal justice response to rape has been the wide-scale adoption of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs that provide specialized medical care and forensic evidence collection to victims. Though previous studies have emphasized the benefits of SANE programs in improving criminal case outcomes, this study illustrates how the post-rape forensic examination can also discourage reporting, investigation, and prosecution. Interviews with local rape care advocates across the United States show how the increasing emphasis on forensic evidence collected through rape kits may provide an opportunity to reflect and enact persistent law enforcement stereotypes toward sexual assault complainants. Unless police resistance to taking rape seriously is confronted and addressed, even well-intentioned policy reforms such as SANE programs may end up undermining—rather than enhancing—fair and thorough investigation of sexual assault allegations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, Michelle. 1998. Reviving Resistance in Rape Law. University of Illinois Law Review 4:9541011.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michelle. 2004. The Legacy of the Prompt Complaint Requirement, Corroboration Requirement, and Cautionary Instructions on Campus Sexual Assault. Boston University Law Review 84:9451022.Google Scholar
Baumer, Eric P., Felson, Richard B., and , Steven Messner, F. 2003. Changes in Police Notification for Rape, 1973–2000. Criminology 41:841870.Google Scholar
BenDor, Jan. 1976. Justice After Rape: Legal Reform in Michigan. In Sexual Assault, ed. Walker, Marcia and Brodsky, Stanley, 149160. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Benedet, Janine, and Grant, Isabel. 2007. Hearing the Sexual Assault Complaints of Women with Mental Disabilities: Consent, Capacity, and Mistaken Belief. McGill Law Journal 52:243289.Google Scholar
Berger, Ronald. 1991. The Social and Political Context of Rape Law Reform: An Aggregate Analysis. Social Science Quarterly 72:221238.Google Scholar
Bevacqua, Maria. 2000. Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Bienan, Leigh. 1980. Rape III—National Developments in Rape Reform Legislation. Women's Rights Law Reporter 6:170213.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Burgess, Ann Wolbert, Lewis‐O'Connor, Annie, Nugent‐Borakove, M. Elaine, and Fanflik, Patricia. 2006. SANE/SART Services for Sexual Assault Victims: Policy Implications. Victims and Offenders 1:205212.Google Scholar
Burt, Martha. 1980. Cultural Myths and Supports for Rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:217230.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca. 1995. The Role of Work Experience and Individual Beliefs in Police Officers' Perceptions of Date Rape: An Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. American Journal of Community Psychology 23:249277.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca. 1998. The Community Response to Rape: Victims' Experiences with the Legal, Medical, and Mental Health Systems. American Journal of Community Psychology 26:355379.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca. 2006. Responding to Sexual Assault Victims' Medical and Emotional Needs: A National Study of the Services Provided by SANE Programs. Research in Nursing & Health 29:384398.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca, and Johnson, Camille. 1997. Police Officers' Perceptions of Rape: Is There Consistency Between State Law and Individual Beliefs? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 12:255274.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca, Patterson, Debra, Bybee, Deborah, and Dworkin, Emily. 2009. Predicting Sexual Assault Prosecution Outcomes: The Role of Medical Forensic Evidence Collected by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners. Criminal Justice and Behavior 36:712727.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca, Patterson, Debra, and Lichty, Lauren. 2005. The Effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs: A Review of Psychological, Medical, Legal, and Community Outcomes. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 6:313329.Google Scholar
Civil Rights Division. 2011. Investigation of the New Orleans Police Department. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Clay‐Warner, Jody, and Burt, Callie Harbin. 2005. Rape Reporting After Reforms: Have Times Really Changed? Violence Against Women 11:150176.Google Scholar
Cole, Simon. 2001. Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Simon. 2007. How Much Justice Can Technology Afford? The Impact of DNA Technology on Equal Criminal Justice. Science and Public Policy 34:95107.Google Scholar
Connell, Noreen, and Wilson, Cassandra. 1974. Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Rose. 2013. Up Against a Wall: Rape Reform and the Failure of Success. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dalla, Rochelle L., Xia, Yan, and Kennedy, Heather. 2003. “You Just Give Them What They Want and Pray They Don't Kill You.” Violence Against Women 9:13671394.Google Scholar
Du Mont, Janice, Miller, Karen‐Lee, and Myhr, Terri L. 2003. The Role of “Real Rape” and “Real Victim” Stereotypes in the Police Reporting Practices of Sexually Assaulted Women. Violence Against Women 9:466486.Google Scholar
Du Mont, Janice, and Myhr, Terri L. 2000. So Few Convictions: The Role of Client‐Related Characteristics in the Legal Processing of Sexual Assaults. Violence Against Women 6:11091136.Google Scholar
Du Mont, Janice, and White, Deborah. 2007. The Uses and Impacts of Medico‐Legal Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: A Global Review. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Du Mont, Janice, White, Deborah, and McGregor, Margaret J. 2009. Investigating the Medical Forensic Examination from the Perspectives of Sexually Assaulted Women. Social Science & Medicine 68:774780.Google Scholar
Edwards, Katie, Turchik, Jessica, Dardis, Christina, Reynolds, Nicole, and Gidycz, Christine. 2011. Rape Myths: History, Individual and Institutional‐Level Presence, and Implications for Change. Sex Roles 65:761773.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ericksen, Janet, Dudley, Carolyn, McIntosh, Gwyneth, Ritch, Lianne, Shumay, Susan, and Simpson, Maureen. 2002. Clients' Experiences with a Specialized Sexual Assault Service. Journal of Emergency Nursing 28:8690.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1986. Rape. Yale Law Journal 95:10871184.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1987. Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fenton, Justin. 2010a. Lack of Police Reports Stalls Review of City Rape Allegations. Baltimore Sun, August 4.Google Scholar
Fenton, Justin. 2010b. Half of Discarded City Rape Claims were Misclassified. Baltimore Sun, December 1.Google Scholar
Freedman, Estelle. 1987. “Uncontrolled Desires”: The Response to the Sexual Psychopath, 1920–1960. Journal of American History 74:83106.Google Scholar
Frohmann, Lisa. 1991. Discrediting Victims' Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections. Social Problems 38:213226.Google Scholar
Frohmann, Lisa. 1997. Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class, and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decisionmaking. Law & Society Review 31:531555.Google Scholar
Futter, Stacy, and Mebane, Jr., Walter, . 2001. The Effects of Rape Law Reform on Rape Case Processing. Berkeley Women's Law Journal 16:72139.Google Scholar
Greeson, Megan, Campbell, Rebecca, and Kobes, Shannon. 2008. Step‐by‐Step Practitioner Toolkit for Evaluating the Work of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs in the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Gruber, Aya. 2009. Rape, Feminism, and the War on Crime. Washington Law Review 84:581658.Google Scholar
Haag, Pamela. 1996. “Putting Your Body on the Line”: The Question of Violence, Victims, and the Legacies of Second‐Wave Feminism. differences 8:2367.Google Scholar
Hart, L. Gary, Larson, Eric H., and M. Lishner, Denise. 2005. Rural Definitions for Health Policy and Research. American Journal of Public Health 95:11491155.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Maria. 1989. Defining “Rural” Areas: Impact on Health Care Policy and Research. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment Staff Paper. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
Hodgson, James. 2001. Policing Sexual Violence: A Case Study of Jane Doe v. The Metropolitan Toronto Police . In Sexual Violence: Policies, Practices, and Challenges in the United States and Canada, ed. Hodgson, James and Kelley, Debra, 173189. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Horos, Carol. 1974. Rape. Wayne, PA: Dell/Banbury.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2009. Testing Justice: The Rape Kit Backlog in Los Angeles City and County. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2010. “I Used to Think the Law Would Protect Me”: Illinois's Failure to Test Rape Kits. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Isserman, Andrew M. 2005. In the National Interest: Defining Rural and Urban Correctly in Research and Public Policy. International Regional Science Review 28:465499.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jan. 2001. Worlds Apart? Women, Rape and the Police Reporting Process. British Journal of Criminology 41:679706.Google Scholar
Kelly, Liz, Lovett, Jo, and Regan, Linda. 2005. A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
Kerstetter, Wayne A. 1990. Gateway to Justice: Police and Prosecutorial Response to Sexual Assaults Against Women. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 81:267313.Google Scholar
LaFree, Gary. 1989. Rape and Criminal Justice: The Social Construction of Sexual Assault. Belmont, CA: Wasdworth.Google Scholar
Ledray, Linda. 1999. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Development and Operation Guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Ledray, Linda. 2005. Forensic Medical Evidence: The Contributions of the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE). In Rape Investigation Handbook, ed. Savino, John O., Turvey, Brent E., and Baeza, John J., 119146. Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Susan. 2003. Unspoken Crimes: Sexual Assault in Rural America. Enola, PA: National Sexual Violence Resource Center.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Littel, Kristin. 2001. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Programs: Improving the Community Response to Sexual Assault Victims. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Loh, Warren. 1980. The Impact of Common Law and Reform Rape Statutes on Prosecution: An Empirical Study. Washington Law Review 55:543655.Google Scholar
Lonsway, Kimberly A., Welch, Susan, and Fitzgerald, Louise F. 2001. Police Training in Sexual Assault Response. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28:695730.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, Jeanne, Geist, Alison, and Caplan, Nathan. 1982. Rape and the Limits of Law Reform. Boston, MA: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2005. Rape Work: Victims, Gender, and Emotions in Organization and Community Context. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, Patricia Yancey, and Marlene Powell, R. 1994. Accounting for the “Second Assault”: Legal Organizations' Framing of Rape Victims. Law & Social Inquiry 19:853890.Google Scholar
Marx, Gary T. 2001. Technology and Social Control: The Search for the Illusive Silver Bullet. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B., 1550615511. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matza, Michael, Fazlollah, Mark, and McCoy, Craig. 1999. Panel to Examine Sex‐Crimes Unit. Philadelphia Inquirer, December 6, City Edition, B1.Google Scholar
McMillan, Lesley. 2010. Understanding Attrition in Rape Cases: End of Award Report. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
McMillan, Lesley, and Thomas, Michelle. 2009. Police Interviews of Rape Victims: Tensions and Contradictions. In Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking, ed. Horvath, Miranda and Brown, Jennifer, 255280. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Mehrhof, Barbara, and Kearon, Pamela. 1971. Rape: An Act of Terror. In Radical Feminism, ed. Koedt, Anne, Levine, Ellen, and Rapone, Anita, 228233. New York: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
Miller, Jody, and Schwartz, Martin D. 1995. Rape Myths and Violence Against Street Prostitutes. Deviant Behavior 16:123.Google Scholar
Mulla, Sameena. 2009. Political Terrains of Emergency Contraception: Medical Staff Perceptions of Sexual Assault Victim Credibility. Anthropology News 50:1011.Google Scholar
Murphy, Erin. 2007. The New Forensics: Criminal Justice, False Certainty, and the Second Generation of Scientific Evidence. California Law Review 95:721798.Google Scholar
National Institute of Justice. 1996. Domestic and Sexual Violence Data Collection: A Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
National Institute of Justice. 2012. Summary of Research Questions Identified Through the Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examination Research Forum. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime and the National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Nugent‐Borakove, M. Elaine, David Troutman, Patricia Fanflik, Johnson, Nicole, Burgess, Ann, and Lewis O'Connor, Annie. 2006. Testing the Efficacy of SANE/SART Programs: Do They Make a Difference in Sexual Assault Arrest & Prosecution Outcomes? Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Moira, and Morgan, Pamela. 2010. American Perceptions of Sexual Violence. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute.Google Scholar
Page, Amy. 2007. Behind the Blue Line: Investigating Police Officers' Attitudes Toward Rape. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 22:2232.Google Scholar
Page, Amy. 2008. Gateway to Reform? Policy Implications of Police Officers' Attitudes Toward Rape. American Journal of Criminal Justice 33:4458.Google Scholar
Parnis, Deborah, and Du, Janice Mont. 1999. Rape Laws and Rape Processing: The Contradictory Nature of Corroboration. Canadian Woman Studies 19:7478.Google Scholar
Patterson, Debra, Campbell, Rebecca, and Townsend, Stephanie M. 2006. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Program Goals and Patient Care Practices Journal of Nursing Scholarship 38:180186.Google Scholar
Petersilia, Joan R. 2001. Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28:655694.Google Scholar
Rees, Gethin. 2010. “It Is Not for Me to Say Whether Consent Was Given or Not”: Forensic Medical Examiners' Construction of “Neutral Reports” in Rape Cases. Social & Legal Studies 19:371386.Google Scholar
Rennison, Callie Marie. 2002. Rape and Sexual Assault: Reporting to Police and Medical Attention, 1992–2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Rozee, Patricia D., and Koss, Mary P. 2001. Rape: A Century of Resistance. Psychology of Women Quarterly 25:295311.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart, Olson, Toska, and Pershing, Jana. 1994. Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy, and Republican Criminology: Washington State's Community Protection Act. Law & Society Review 28:729763.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen. 1998. Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Martin D. 2010. Police Investigation of Rape—Roadblocks and Solutions. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Sievers, Valerie, Murphy, Sherri, and Miller, Joseph J. 2003. Sexual Assault Evidence Collection More Accurate When Completed by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners: Colorado's Experience. Journal of Emergency Nursing 29:511514.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, Beichner, Dawn, and Davis‐Frenzel, Erika. 2001. Prosecutorial Justification for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: Guarding the “Gateway of Justice.” Social Problems 48:206235.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, and Horney, Julie. 1992. Rape Law Reform: A Grassroots Revolution and Its Impact. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, and Tellis, Katharine. 2012a. The Criminal Justice System's Response to Sexual Violence. Violence Against Women 18:169192.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, and Tellis, Katharine. 2012b. Policing and Prosecuting Sexual Assault in Los Angeles City and County: A Collaborative Study in Partnership with the Los Angeles Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, and the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. Final Report to the US Department of Justice for Award 2009‐WG‐BX‐0009.Google Scholar
Temkin, Jennifer. 1997. Plus Ça Change—Reporting Rape in the 1990s. British Journal of Criminology 37:507528.Google Scholar
Tjaden, Patricia, and Thoennes, Nancy. 2006. Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Rape Victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Totenberg, Nina. 2011. Morning Edition. National Public Radio, May 18.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2004. A National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations: Adults/Adolescents. Washington, DC: Office on Violence Against Women.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2012. Attorney General Eric Holder Announces Revisions to the Uniform Crime Report's Definition of Rape. Washington, DC, January 6.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel. 2003. The New Paradigm of Police Accountability: The U.S. Justice Department “Pattern or Practice” Suits in Context. St. Louis University Public Law Review 22:352.Google Scholar
Weiss, Karen G. 2011. Neutralizing Sexual Victimization: A Typology of Victims' Non‐Reporting Accounts. Theoretical Criminology 15:445467.Google Scholar
Laura, X. 1999. Accomplishing the Impossible: An Advocate's Notes from the Successful Campaign to Make Marital and Date Rape a Crime in All 50 US States and Other Countries. Violence Against Women 5:10641081.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Reedy v. Evanson . 2010. 615 F.3d 197 (3d Cir.).Google Scholar