Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:11:28.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after Critique? Revisiting Gordon's “Critical Legal Histories”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Christopher Tomlins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For more than twenty-five years, Robert Gordon's “Critical Legal Histories” has been savored by legal historians as one of the most incisive explanations available of what legal history can and should be. Gordon's essay, however, is of significance to the course of sociolegal studies in general. This commentary offers an appreciation, and a critique, of “Critical Legal Histories.” It explores Gordon's articulation of the central themes of critical legal studies, in particular his corrosion of functionalism and embrace of the indeterminacy thesis, and assesses the consequences for sociolegal and legal-historical analysis of the resultant stress on the contingency and complexity of social life.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Winter 2012 , pp. 155 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, Louis. 1969. For Marx. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Balbus, Isaac D. 1977. Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the “Relative Autonomy” of the Law. Law and Society Review 11 (3): 571–88.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1999a. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1999b. Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century: Exposé[of 1939]. In The Arcades Project, 14–26. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blanqui, Auguste. 1872. L'Eternité par les Astres: Hypothèse Astronomique. Paris: Librairie Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul. 1984. Of Law and the River. Journal of Legal Education 34 (2): 222–29.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 2002. Legitimating the New Legal Orthodoxy. In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G., 306–34. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Laura F. 2009. The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post‐Revolutionary South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fischl, Richard Michael. 1992. The Question that Killed Critical Legal Studies. Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4): 779–820.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Sterling, Joyce. 1998. From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State. Law and Society Review 32 (2): 409–71.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1975. Introduction: J. Willard Hurst and the Common Law Tradition in American Legal Historiography. Law and Society Review 10 (1): 9–55.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1976. Recent Trends in Legal Historiography. Law Library Journal 69 (4): 462–68.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1981. Historicism in Legal Scholarship. Yale Law Journal 90 (5): 1017–56.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1982. New Developments in Legal Theory. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, ed. Kairys, David, 281–93. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 57–125.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1985. “Of Law and the River,” and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom. Journal of Legal Education 35 (1): 1–9, 13–16.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1996a. The Past as Authority and as Social Critic: Stabilizing and Destabilizing Functions of History in Legal Argument. In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, ed. McDonald, Terrence J., 339–78. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1996b. The Struggle for the Past. Cleveland State Law Review 44 (1): 123–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1997. Foreword: The Arrival of Critical Historicism. Stanford Law Review 49 (5): 1023–29.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W., and Nelson, William. 1988. An Exchange on Critical Legal Studies between Robert W. Gordon and William Nelson. Law and History Review 6 (1): 139–86.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1985. Pigs and Positivism. Wisconsin Law Review 1985 (4): 899–935.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1973. The Conservative Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. American Journal of Legal History 17 (3): 275–94.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1977. The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1973 1996. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1980. On Recent Marxist Theories of Law, the State, and Juridico‐Political Ideology. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 8:339–68.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1979. The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries. Buffalo Law Review 28 (2): 205–382.Google Scholar
Kingson, Jennifer A. 1987. Harvard Tenure Battle Puts “Critical Legal Studies” on Trial. New York Times August 30. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/30/weekinreview/harvard‐tenure‐battle‐puts‐critical‐legal‐studies‐on‐trial.html (accessed October 23, 2010.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice. 1990. His and Her Story: The Life and Future of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18 (1): 69–90.Google Scholar
Martin, Peter W. 1985. “Of Law and the River,” and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom. Journal of Legal Education 35 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry. 1984. Notes Toward an Intimate, Opinionated, and Affectionate History of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 391–411.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry. 2007. CLS Wasn't Killed by a Question. Alabama Law Review 58 (5): 967–77.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Louis B. 1984. With Gun and Camera through Darkest CLS‐Land. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 413–64.Google Scholar
Strathern Marilyn. 1991 2004. Partial Connections. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1965. The Peculiarities of the English. Socialist Register 2:311–63.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1978. The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Timmons, Brian. 1990. That's No Okie, That's My Torts Professor. Wall Street Journal April 3, A20.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 2000. Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical Narrative. Law and Society Review 34 (4): 911–72.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 2007. How Autonomous Is Law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:45–68.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1984. Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 575–622.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1990. Back to the Future: The Short Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18 (1): 1–56.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., and Esser, John. 1989. “Critical Empiricism” in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box? Law & Social Inquiry 14 (1): 3–52.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1987. Social Theory: Its Situation and Task. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodiwiss, Anthony. 1990. Rights versus Conspiracy: A Sociological Essay on the History of Labor Law in the United States. New York/Oxford/Munich: Berg.Google Scholar