Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

What Is Transnational Law?

  • Roger Cotterrell
Abstract

Is it important to conceptualize transnational law and “map” it as a new legal field? This article suggests that to do so might help both juristic practice and sociolegal scholarship in organizing, linking, and comparing disparate but increasingly significant types of regulation. To explore the idea of transnational law is to raise basic questions about the nature of both “law” and “society” (taken as the realm law regulates). This involves radically rethinking relationships between the public and the private, between law and state, and between different sources of law and legal authority. Taking as its focus Von Daniels's The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective and Calliess and Zumbansen's Rough Consensus and Running Code (both 2010), the article considers what approaches may be most productive, and what key issues need to be addressed, to make sense of broad trends in law's extension beyond the boundaries of nation-states.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Austin, John. 1885. On the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. In Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law, 5th ed., ed. Campbell, Robert, 1071–91. London: John Murray.
Barber, N. W. 2006. Legal Pluralism and the European Union. European Law Journal 12:306–29.
Beck, Ulrich, and Sznaider, Natan. 2006. Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda. British Journal of Sociology 57:122.
Bentley, Sarah. 2011. Ricken Patel is Trying to Bring Governments and Businesses to Heel around the Globe. It's Finger Clicking Good. Times (London), February 9. http://www.scribd.com/doc/48808533/The‐Times‐profile‐of‐Avaaz‐and‐Ricken‐Patel‐Feb‐9‐2011 (accessed April 26, 2011).
Berman, Harold J. 1995. World Law. Fordham International Law Journal 18:1617–22.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2002. The Globalization of Jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151:311546.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2005. From International Law to Law and Globalization. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43:485556.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2006. Book Review Essay—Seeing Beyond the Limits of International Law. Texas Law Review 84:12651306.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2007. Global Legal Pluralism. Southern California Law Review 80:11551237.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2009. The New Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:225–42.
Bernstein, Lisa. 2001. Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation through Rules, Norms, and Institutions. Michigan Law Review 99:1724–90.
Calliess, Gralf‐Peter. 2007. The Making of Transnational Contract Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:469–84.
Calliess, Gralf‐Peter, and Renner, Moritz. 2009. Between Law and Social Norms: The Evolution of Global Governance. Ratio Juris 22:260–80.
Calliess, Gralf‐Peter, and Zumbansen, Peer. 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Colvin, Eric. 1978. The Sociology of Secondary Rules. University of Toronto Law Journal 28:195214.
Commission on European Contract Law. Principles of European Contract Law. http://frontpage.cbs.dk/law/commission_on_european_contract_law/ (accessed May 16, 2011).
Cotterrell, Roger. 1995. Law's Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2006. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2008a. Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2008b. Transnational Communities and the Concept of Law. Ratio Juris 21:118.
Cover, Robert. 1992. Nomos and Narrative. In Narrative, Violence and the Law: The Essays of Robert Cover, ed. Minow, Martha, Ryan, Michael, and Sarat, Austin, 95172. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Culver, Keith C., and Giudice, Michael. 2010. Legality's Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Di Robilant, Anna. 2006. Genealogies of Soft Law. American Journal of Comparative Law 54:499554.
Dingwall, Robert. 1999. Professions and Social Order in a Global Society. International Review of Sociology 9:131–40.
Djelic, Marie‐Laure, and Quack, Sigrid. 2010. Transnational Communities and Their Impact on the Governance of Business and Economic Activity. In Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance, ed. Djelic, Marie‐Laure and Quack, Sigrid, 377413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
European Advertising Standards Alliance. About EASA: What Is EASA? http://www.easa‐alliance.org/About‐EASA/Who‐What‐Why‐/page.aspx/110 (accessed May 16, 2011).
Forest Stewardship Council. About FSC. http://www.fsc.org/about‐fsc.html (accessed May 16, 2011).
Froomkin, A. Michael. 2003. Habermas@Discourse.Net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review 116:749873.
GlobalG.A.P. Welcome to GlobalG.A.P. http://www.globalgap.org/cms/front_content.php?idcat=9 (accessed May 16, 2011).
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gould, Carol C. 2007. Transnational Solidarities. Journal of Social Philosophy 38:148–64.
Graver, Hans Petter. 1990. Administrative Decision‐Making and the Concept of Law. In Postinterventionistisches Recht, ed. Görlitz, Axel and Voight, Rüdiger, 177–94. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus‐Verlagsgesellschaft.
Halliday, Terence C., and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm‐Making and National Law‐Making in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112:11351202.
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law, 2d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity.
Higgins, Rosalyn. 2006. A Babel of Judicial Voices? Ruminations from the Bench. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55:791804.
International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). UNIDROIT: An Overview. http://www.unidroit.org/dynasite.cfm?dsmid=103284 (accessed May 16, 2011).
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Getting Started in the IETF. http://www.ietf.org/newcomers.html (accessed March 31, 2011).
Jessup, Philip C. 2006. Transnational Law (Extracts). In Philip C. Jessup's Transnational Law Revisited—On the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of its Publication, ed. Tietje, Christian, Brouder, Alan, and Nowrot, Karsten, 4555. Halle‐Wittenberg: Martin‐Luther‐Universität. http://www.wirtschaftsrecht.uni‐halle.de/sites/default/files/altbestand/Heft50.pdf (accessed April 18, 2011).
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75:181208.
Llewellyn, Karl N. 2008. Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
MacCormick, Neil. 1993. Beyond the Sovereign State. Modern Law Review 56:118.
Melissaris, Emmanuel. 2009. Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space for Legal Pluralism. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Michaels, Ralf. 2007. The True Lex Mercatoria: Law beyond the State. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:447–68.
Michaels, Ralf. 2009. Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:243–62.
Network Working Group. 2004. IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees (Request for Comments 3777). http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3777 (accessed March 31, 2011).
Payandeh, Mehrdad. 2010. The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H. L. A. Hart. European Journal of International Law 21:967–95.
Pilkington, Ed. 2011. Avaaz: The Online Activist Network That Is Targeting Rupert Murdoch's Bid. Guardian (London), April 25. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/apr/24/avaaz‐activist‐network‐rupert‐murdoch/print?avaaz (accessed April 26, 2011).
Quack, Sigrid. 2007. Legal Professionals and Transnational Law‐Making: A Case of Distributed Agency. Organization 14:643–66.
Rödl, Florian. 2008. Private Law Beyond the Democratic Order? On the Legitimatory Problem of Private Law “Beyond the State.” American Journal of Comparative Law 56:743–67.
Schultz, Thomas. 2011. Internet Disputes, Fairness in Arbitration and Transnationalism: A Reply to Julia Hörnle. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 19:153–63.
Scott, Colin, Cafaggi, Fabrizio, and Senden, Linda. 2011. The Conceptual and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation. Journal of Law and Society 38:119.
Snyder, Francis. 1999. Economic Globalisation: Global Legal Pluralism and European Law. European Law Journal 5:334–74.
Tietje, Christian, and Nowrot, Karsten. 2006. Laying Conceptual Ghosts to Rest: The Rise of Philip C. Jessup's “Transnational Law” in the Regulatory Governance of the International Economic System. In Philip C. Jessup's Transnational Law Revisited—On the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of its Publication, ed. Tietje, Christian, Brouder, Alan, and Nowrot, Karsten, 1743. Halle‐Wittenberg: Martin‐Luther‐Universität. http://www.wirtschaftsrecht.uni‐halle.de/sites/default/files/altbestand/Heft50.pdf (accessed April 18, 2011).
UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). UNCITRAL Texts and Status. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts.html (accessed May 16, 2011).
Urry, John. 2000. Mobile Sociology. British Journal of Sociology 51:185203.
Von Daniels, Detlef. 2010. The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
Wai, Robert. 2008. The Interlegality of Transnational Private Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 71:107–27.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Trans. Ephraim Fischoff et al. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Zumbansen, Peer. 2002. Piercing the Legal Veil: Commercial Arbitration and Transnational Law. European Law Journal 8:400–32.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law & Social Inquiry
  • ISSN: 0897-6546
  • EISSN: 1747-4469
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-social-inquiry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed