Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-30T03:02:51.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enforcement Principles and Environmental Agencies: Principal-Agent Relationships in a Delegated Environmental Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Mark Atlas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines whether states shirked enforcement responsibilities in their principal-agent relationship with the federal government when implementing a delegated environmental program. It evaluates determinants of environmental enforcement stringency, particularly whether penalties were less when imposed by states than by the federal government. It analyzes 6,048 hazardous waste administrative penalties across 32 states and all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regions over 14 years. It finds that state penalties are typically substantially lower than federal penalties, and that penalty amounts are typically also related to the partisan composition of elected officials and the characteristics of enforcement actions, such as the type, seriousness, and number of violations. Factors such as the influence of organized interest groups, agency sensitivity to economic conditions or the economic importance of regulated industries, and environmentalist preferences of elected officials and the public are typically unrelated to enforcement stringency.

Information

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 939 - 980
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The author appreciates the helpful comments of the reviewers, and particularly those of the editor.

References

References

Atlas, Mark K. (2001) “Rush to Judgment: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Equity in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Actions,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 633–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, Mark K. (2002) “Few and Far Between? An Environmental Equity Analysis of the Geographic Distribution of Hazardous Waste Generation,” 83 Social Science Q. 365–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braile, Robert (1999) “EPA finds state regulators lax on environment; Recommends more inspections and larger fines for violators,” Boston Globe, 16 May, p. 1.Google Scholar
Brown, R. Steven, & Green, Valerie (2001) Report to Congress: State Environmental Agency Contributions to Enforcement and Compliance. Washington, DC: Environmental Council of the States.Google Scholar
Cannon, Joseph A. (1983) “Compliance Strategy for Stationary Sources of Air Pollution.” Memorandum from Joseph A. Cannon, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, to Alvin Alm, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Deputy Administrator.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mark A. (1987) “Optimal Enforcement Strategy to Prevent Oil Spills: An Application of a Principal-Agent Model With Moral Hazard,” 30 J. of Law & Economics 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Mark A. (1992) “Legal/Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence on Enforcement of Federal Environmental Statutes, 82 J. of Criminal Law & Criminology 1054–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlan, Timothy (1988) New Federalism: Intergovernmental Reform from Nixon to Reagan. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Crotty, Patricia McGee (1987) “The New Federalism Game: Primacy Implementation of Environmental Policy,” 17 Publius 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, David A. (1998) “The Uncertain Merits of Environmental Enforcement Reform: The Case of Supplemental Environmental Projects,” 1998 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1181–221.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles, & Davis, Sandra K. (1999) “State Enforcement of the Federal Hazardous Waste Program,” 31 Polity 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, Christopher S. (2005) “Do Regulators Respond to Voluntary Pollution Control Efforts? A Count Data Analysis,” 23 Contemporary Economic Policy 180–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deily, Mary E., & Gray, Wayne B. (1991) “Enforcement of Pollution Regulations in a Declining Industry,” 21 J. of Environmental Economics & Management 260–74.Google Scholar
Dwyer, John P. (1997) “The Role of State Law in an Era of Federal Preemption: Lessons from Environmental Regulation,” 60 Law and Contemporary Problems 203–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Randall (2000) “U.S. Probe Aimed at Ohio EPA Complaints Say Enforcement is Lax,” Columbus Dispatch, 31 Jan., p. 1A.Google Scholar
Engel, Kirsten E. (1997) “State Environmental Standard-Setting: Is There a ‘Race’ and Is It ‘To the Bottom’?,” 48 Hastings Law J. 271–376.Google Scholar
Gray, Wayne B., & Deily, Mary E. (1996) “Compliance and Enforcement: Air Pollution Regulation in the U.S. Steel Industry,” 31 J. of Environmental Economics & Management 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James T. (1996) “Going By the (Informal) Book: The EPA's Use of Informal Rules in Enforcing Hazardous Waste Laws,” in Libecap, G., ed., Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Growth, Vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hedge, David M., et al. (1991) “The Principal-Agent Model and Regulatory Federalism,” 44 Western Political Q. 1055–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helland, Eric (1998) “Environmental Protection in the Federalist System: The Political Economy of NPDES Inspections,” 36 Economic Inquiry 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helland, Eric (2001) “Prosecutorial Discretion at the EPA: Some Evidence on Litigation Strategy,” 19 J. of Regulatory Economics 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Peter J. (1967) “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Non-Standard Conditions,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Susan, & Waterman, Richard (1992) “Determining an Agency's Regulatory Style: How Does the EPA Water Office Enforce the Law?,” 45 Western Political Q. 401–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Annysa (2002) “Report accuses DNR of lax pollution control,” Milwaukee J. Sentinel, 29 Jan., p. 3B.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. (1989) “Understanding Regulatory Enforcement,” 11 Law & Policy 89–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleit, Andrew N., et al. (1998) “Environmental Protection, Agency Motivations, and Rent Extraction: The Regulation of Water Pollution in Louisiana,” 13 J. of Regulatory Economics 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Michael E. (2000) “Environmental Policy in Congress: From Consensus to Gridlock,” in Vig, N. & Kraft, M., eds., Environmental Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Robert R. (1996) “The Limits of Devolving Enforcement of Federal Environmental Laws,” 70 Tulane Law Rev. 2373–95.Google Scholar
List, John A., & Gerking, Shelby D. (1996) “Optimal Institutional Arrangements for Pollution Control,” 26 J. of Regional Analysis & Policy 113–33.Google Scholar
List, John A., & Gerking, Shelby D. (2000) “Regulatory Federalism and Environmental Protection in the United States,” 40 J. of Regional Science 453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael J., et al. (2004a) “Slippery Business: Race, Class, and Legal Determinants of Penalties Against Petroleum Refineries,” 34 J. of Black Studies 421–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael J., et al. (2004b) “Determinants of Environmental Law Violation Fines Against Petroleum Refineries: Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Aggregation Effects,” 17 Society & Natural Resources 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, David L. (2000) “The Role of Deterrence-Based Enforcement in a ‘Reinvented’ State/Federal Relationship: The Divide Between Theory and Reality,” 24 Harvard Environmental Law Rev. 1–114.Google Scholar
Marvel, Mary K. (1982) “Implementation and Safety Regulation: Variations in Federal and State Administration Under OSHA,” 14 Administration & Society 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Allan, & Welch, Eric W. (1999) “The geography of American environmentalism,” 2 Environmental Science & Policy 389–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., et al. (1987) “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” 3 J. of Law, Economics, and Organization 243–77.Google Scholar
McKinney, Lucinda K. (1998) “Technical Complexity, Regionalism, and Decision-Making: Case Processing Outcomes in EPA's Toxic Substances Program,” 35 Social Science J. 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millimet, Daniel L. (2003) “Assessing the Empirical Impact of Environmental Federalism,” 43 J. of Regional Science 711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Joel A. (2001) “Scrutinizing Environmental Enforcement: A Comment on a Recent Discussion at the AALS,” 17 J. of Land Use & Environmental Law 127–48.Google Scholar
Mintz, Joel A. (2005) “‘Neither the Best of Times Nor the Worst of Times’: EPA Enforcement During the Clinton Administration,” 35 Environmental Law Reporter 10390–412.Google Scholar
Oljaca, Neda, et al. (1998) “Penalty Functions for Environmental Violations: Evidence from Water Quality Enforcement,” 14 J. of Regulatory Economics 255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polakovic, Gary (2001) “State Analyst Criticizes Air Quality Effort; Pollution: Report Says Poor Oversight And Lax Enforcement Are Hindering Progress Against Smog. Regulatory Officials Say the Study Is Flawed,” Los Angeles Times, 29 Jan., p. 3.Google Scholar
Potoski, Matthew (2001) “Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom?,” 61 Public Administration Rev. 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, Barry G. (2000) “Power to the States: The Promise and Pitfalls of Decentralization,” in Vig, N. & Kraft, M., eds., Environmental Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard L. (1992) “Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the ‘Race-to-the-Bottom’ Rational for Federal Environmental Regulation,” 67 New York University Law Rev. 1210–54.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard L. (1997) “The Race to the Bottom and Federal Environmental Regulation: A Response to Critics,” 82 Minnesota Law Rev. 535–64.Google Scholar
Ringquist, Evan J. (1998) “A Question of Justice: Equity in Environmental Litigation, 1974-1991,” 60 J. of Politics 1148–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan J., & Emmert, Craig E. (1999) “Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case of Environmental Civil Litigation,” 52 Political Research Q. 7–37.Google Scholar
Saleska, Scott R., & Engel, Kirsten H. (1998) “‘Facts are Stubborn Things’: An Empirical Reality Check in the Theoretical Debate Over the Race-to-the-Bottom in State Environmental Standard-Setting,” 8 Cornell J. of Law & Public Policy 55–88.Google Scholar
Scheberle, Denise (1997) Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, John T., & Wang, Cheng-Lung (2006) “Cooptation or Transformation? Local Policy Networks and Federal Regulatory Enforcement,” 50 American J. of Political Science 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, John T., & Wei, Feng Heng (1986) “Regulatory Enforcement in a Federalist System,” 80 American Political Science Rev. 1249–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scicchitano, Michael J., & Hedge, David M. (1993) “From Coercion to Partnership in Federal Partial Preemption: SMCRA, RCRA, and OSH Act,” 23 Publius 107–21.Google Scholar
Steinzor, Rena I. (2000) “Devolution and the Public Health,” 24 Harvard Environmental Law Rev. 351–463.Google Scholar
Thompson, Frank J., & Scicchitano, Michael J. (1985a) “State Implementation Effort and Federal Regulatory Policy: The Case of Occupational Safety and Health,” 47 J. of Politics 686–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Frank J., & Scicchitano, Michael J. (1985b) “State Enforcement of Federal Regulatory Policy: The Lessons of OSHA,” 13 Policy Studies J. 591–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (2001) 1997 Economic Census, Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services, Miscellaneous Subject. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1980) “Consolidated Permit Regulations: RCRA Hazardous Waste; SDWA Underground Injection Control; CWA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; CWA Section 404 Dredge or Fill Programs; and CAA Prevention of Significant Deterioration,” 45 Federal Register 33290–513.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1982) “Permit Regulations; Revision in Accordance with Settlement,” 48 Federal Register 39611–23.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984a) Civil Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984b) Final RCRA Civil Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984c) Implementing the State/Federal Partnership in Enforcement: State/Federal Enforcement “Agreements.” Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986) Policy Framework for State/EPA Enforcement Agreements. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987) Enforcement Response Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989a) Consolidated Report on Review of EPA's Controls Over Administrative Penalties Under the RCRA Enforcement Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989b) “Requirements for the Preparation, Adoption and Submittal of Implementation Plans; Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans,” 54 Federal Register 27274–86.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990a) RCRA Civil Penalty Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1990b) The Nation's Hazardous Waste Management Program at a Crossroads: The RCRA Implementation Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991a) Policy on the Use of Supplemental Environmental Projects in EPA Settlements. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991b) Enforcement Accomplishments Report: FY 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991c) Region 8's Administration of State Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Enforcement Activities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992) FY 1991 Enforcement Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993a) Oversight of State and Local Penalty Assessments: Revisions to the Policy Framework for State/EPA Enforcement Agreements. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993b) Enforcement Accomplishments Report: FY 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Enforcement Accomplishments Report: FY 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995a) Interim Revised Supplemental Environmental Projects Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995b) Revised Interim Clean Water Act Settlement Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995c) Policy on Flexible State Enforcement Responses to Small Community Violations. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1995d) FY 1994 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996a) Hazardous Waste Civil Enforcement Response Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996b) FY 1995 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997a) Further Improvements Needed in the Administration of RCRA Civil Penalties. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997b) FY 1996 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998a) Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) Data Element Dictionary (v.7.0.0). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998b) “Final EPA Supplemental Projects Policy Issued,” 63 Federal Register 24796–804.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998c) EPA Office of Compliance Sector Notebook Project: Sector Notebook Data Refresh–1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998d) “Announcement and Publication of the Policy for Municipality and Municipal Solid Waste; CERCLA Settlements at NPL Co-Disposal Sites,” 63 Federal Register 8197–201.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998e) Consolidated Report on OECA's Oversight of Regional and State Air Enforcement Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998f) Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report: FY 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998g) Revised RCRA Inspection Manual (November 1998 Revision). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999a) Identification and Enforcement of RCRA Significant Non-Compliers by EPA Region III and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999b) RCRA Significant Non-Complier Identification and Enforcement by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999c) RCRA Enforcement: Region 2's Enforcement of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999d) Enforcement and Compliance Assurance: FY98 Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000a) Resource Conservation and Recovery Information (RCRIS). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000b) Annual Report on Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments in 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2001) Appropriate Violator Classifications and Timely Initial Enforcement Actions Would Strengthen Montana's RCRA Enforcement Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) “Agency Policy and Guidance: Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy,” 69 Federal Register 31277–86.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1985a) Assessment of EPA's Hazardous Waste Enforcement Strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1985b) Air Pollution: Environmental Protection Agency's Inspections of Stationary Sources. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1986) Hazardous Waste: Adequacy of EPA Attorney Resource Levels. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1987) Hazardous Waste: Facility Inspections Are Not Thorough and Complete. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1988) Hazardous Waste: Many Enforcement Actions Do Not Meet EPA Standards. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1990) Air Pollution: Improvements Needed in Detecting and Preventing Violations. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1991a) Environmental Enforcement: Penalties May Not Recover Economic Benefits Gained by Violators. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1991b) Observations on EPA and State Enforcement Under the Clean Water Act. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1992) Hazardous Waste: Impediments Delay Timely Closing and Cleanup of Facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1993) Environmental Enforcement: EPA Cannot Ensure the Accuracy of Self-Reported Compliance Monitoring. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1995) EPA and the States: Environmental Challenges Require a Better Working Relationship. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1996) Water Pollution: Many Violations Have Not Received Appropriate Enforcement Attention. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1998) Environmental Protection: EPA's and States' Efforts to Focus State Enforcement Programs on Results. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (2000) Environmental Protection: More Consistency Needed Among EPA Regions in Approach to Enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
Welborn, David M. (1988) “Conjoint Federalism and Environmental Regulation in the United States,” 18 Publius 27–43.Google Scholar
Wikle, Thomas A. (1995) “Geographical Patterns of Membership in U.S. Environmental Organizations,” 47 Professional Geographer 41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. Dan (1992) “Modeling Federal Implementation as a System: The Clean Air Case,” 36 American J. of Political Science 40–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Joseph F. (2005) Congressional Preemption: Regulatory Federalism. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, Matthew D. (2002) “Policing Environmental Regulatory Enforcement: Cooperation, Capture, and Citizen Suits,” 21 Stanford Environmental Law J. 81–174.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Harmon Industries, Inc. v. Browner, 191 F. 3d 894-904 (8th Cir. 1999).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Power Engineering Company, 303 F. 3d 1232-35 (10th Cir. 2002).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

42 U.S.C. §6928 (2000) (concerning federal enforcement of hazardous waste management laws).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 6928(a) (2000) (concerning federal compliance orders for hazardous waste management).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 6928(a)(3) (2000) (concerning maximum penalty under federal compliance orders for hazardous waste management).Google Scholar
“Agency Policy and Guidance: Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy,” 69 Federal Register 31277–86.Google Scholar
“Announcement and Publication of the Policy for Municipality and Municipal Solid Waste; CERCLA Settlements at NPL Co-Disposal Sites,” 63 Federal Register 8197–201 (1998).Google Scholar
Biennial report, 40 C.F.R. § 262.41 (2005).Google Scholar
“Consolidated Permit Regulations: RCRA Hazardous Waste; SDWA Underground Injection Control; CWA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; CWA Section 404 Dredge or Fill Programs; and CAA Prevention of Significant Deterioration,” 45 Federal Register 33290–513 (1980).Google Scholar
“Final EPA Supplemental Projects Policy Issued,” 63 Federal Register 24796–804 (1998)Google Scholar
Memorandum of Agreement with the Regional Administrator, 40 C.F.R. § 271.8 (2005).Google Scholar
“Permit Regulations; Revision in Accordance with Settlement,” 48 Federal Register 39611–23 (1983).Google Scholar
Requirements for enforcement authority, initial RCRA state authorization regulations, 40 C.F.R. § 123.9(c) (1981).Google Scholar
Requirements for enforcement authority, 40 C.F.R. § 271.16(a)(3)(i) (2005).Google Scholar
“Requirements for the Preparation, Adoption and Submittal of Implementation Plans; Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans,” 54 Federal Register 27274–86 (1989).Google Scholar
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992k (2000).Google Scholar