Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T07:46:28.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reclaiming the Power to Punish: Legislating and Administrating the California Supermax, 1982–1989

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Keramet Reiter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how increasingly punitive prison conditions, epitomized by the birth and spread of the supermax prison, developed in the United States. This analysis builds on a growing literature about the “new punitiveness” of U.S. punishment policy and its global proliferation. This article shifts the focus away from the policies that have led to increasing rates of incarceration, however, and toward the policies that have shaped the conditions of incarceration. Drawing on archival research and more than 30 oral history interviews with key informants, I examine the administrative and legislative processes that underwrote the supermax innovation in California in the 1980s. During California's late twentieth-century prison-building spree, prison administrators deployed multiple rhetorics of risk to extend their control over conditions of confinement in state prisons. As the state invested billions of dollars in prison building initiatives, legislators, who were focused primarily on building prisons faster, ceded authority over prison design and conditions to prison administrators. In the end, rather than implementing legislative policy, prison administrators initiated their own policies, institutionalizing a new form of “supermax” confinement, pushing at the limits of constitutionally acceptable practices.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 484 - 518
Copyright
© 2016 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alger, Paula & Molinari, Theresa (1987) The Use of General Obligation Bonds by the State of California. Sacramento, CA: California Debt Advisory Commission, Sept. 9, Available at: www.treasurer.ca.gov/cdiac/reports/go_use.pdf (accessed 25 February 2011).Google Scholar
Alexander, Michelle (2010) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Aman, Alfred C. (2005) “Privatization, Prisons, Democracy, and Human Rights: The Need to Extend the Province of Administrative Law,” 12 Indiana J. of Global Legal Studies 511–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Tom & Simon, Jonathan (2002) Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa (2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Jeffrey (2013) “Op-ed: Hunger strike in California prisons is a gang power play,” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 6, Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2013/aug/06/opinion/la-oe-beard-prison-hunger-strike-20130806 (accessed 10 February 2015).Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty (1998) “Immigration, Law, and Marginalization in a Global Economy: Notes from Spain,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 529–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, Kitty, & Val, Jenness (2014) Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Department of Justice (2009) “Sex Offender Registration and Exclusion Information,” Available at: http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/sexreg.aspx?lang=ENGLISH (accessed 4 March 2011).Google Scholar
Campbell, Michael (2011) “Politics, Prisons, and Law Enforcement: An Examination of the Emergence of ‘Law and Order’ Politics in Texas,” 45 Law and Society Rev. 631–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Michael C., & Schoenfeld, Heather (2013) “The Transformation of America's Penal Order: A Historicized Political Sociology of Punishment,” 118 American J. of Sociology 1375–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Robert (2015) “We Are Not Slaves: Rethinking the Rise of Carceral States through the Lens of the Prisoners’ Rights Movement,” 102 J. of American History 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantini, Cristina, & Rivas, Jorge (2015) “Shadow Prisons,” Fusion, Feb. 4, Available at: http://interactive.fusion.net/shadow-prisons/(accessed 11 February 2015).Google Scholar
Cummins, Eric (1994) The Rise and Fall of California's Radical Prison Movement. Stanford: Stanford Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Dayan, Colin (2008) “Due Process & Lethal Confinement,” 107 South Atlantic Q. 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domanick, Joe (2004) Cruel Justice: Three Strikes and the Politics of Crime in America's Golden State. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1990) “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace,” 95 American J. of Sociology 1401–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., & Simon, Jonathan (1992) “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications,” 30 Criminology 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Ronald (1979) Blood of Spain: An Oral History of the Spanish Civil War. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Garland, David (2001) Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, Ruth Wilson (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Larry (1997) “History from the Inside Out: Prison Life in Nineteenth-Century Massachusetts,” 31 J. of Social History 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie (2009) “The Long Reach of the Carceral State: The Politics of Crime, Mass Imprisonment, and Penal Reform in the United States and Abroad,” 34 Law & Social Inquiry, 439–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Lynn (2010) “Working through Mass Incarceration: Gender and the Politics of Prison Labor from East to West,” 36 Signs 73–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (2005) “Criminogenic Needs and the Transformative Risk Subject,” 7 Punishment & Society 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, John (2005) The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie, & Grattet, Ryken (2005) “The Reconstitution of Law in Local Settings: Agency Discretion, Ambiguity, and a Surplus of Law in the Policing of Hate Crime,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 893–941.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert (1978) Regulatory Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Koehler, Johann (2015) “Development and fracture of a discipline: Legacies of the School of Criminology at Berkeley,” 53 Criminology 513–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laub, John H. (1984) “Talking About Crime: Oral History in Criminology and Criminal Justice,” 12 Oral History Rev. 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebling, Alison (2011) “Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain,” 13 Punishment & Society 530–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Ian Haney (2014) Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona (2010) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona (2002) “Selling ‘securityware’: Transformations in prison commodities advertising, 1949-99,” 4 Punishment & Society 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona (1998) “Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 839–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattera, Phillip, ed. (2004) “Public Finance and Public Debt,” Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First, Available at: http://www.publicbonds.org/prison_fin/prison_fin.htm (accessed 13 December 2010).Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven, Musheno, Michael, & Palumbo, Dennis (1990) “Street-Wise Social Policy: Resolving the Dilemma of Street-Level Influence and Successful Implementation,” 43 Western Political Q. 833–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorkel, Jill (2013) Breaking Women: Gender, Race, and the New Politics of Imprisonment. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McLennan, Rebecca (2003) “Punishment's ‘Square Deal’: Prisoners and their Keepers in 1920s New York,” 29 J. of Urban History 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, Rebecca (2008) The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776-1941. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoughlin, Daniel (2013) “The Fiction of Sovereignty and the Real State of Exception: Giorgio Agamben's Critique of Carl Schmitt,” 1 Law, Culture and the Humanities 1–20.Google Scholar
McPherson, Chad M., & Sauder, Michael (2013) “Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court,” 58 Administrative Science Q. 165–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messinger, Sheldon L. (1984) “Introduction,” in The Art of Corrections Management, California 1967-1974, Government History Documentation Project, Ronald Reagan Gubernatorial Era. Berkeley: Regional Oral History Office.Google Scholar
Messinger, Sheldon L., & Johnson, Philip E. (1987) “California's Determinate Sentencing Statute: History and Issues,” in Zimring, Franklin E. & Frase, Richard S., eds., The Criminal Justice System: Materials on the Administrations and Reform of the Criminal Law, Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 950–87.Google Scholar
Mills, Alan (2013) “Refusing to Disappear: Prisoners at Tamms and their Families Conducted a Sustained Advocacy Campaign to Shut this ‘Supermax’ Down,” ACLU Blog, Jan 4, Available at: https://www.aclu.org/blog/refusing-disappear-prisoners-tamms-and-their-families-conducted-sustained-advocacy-campaign (accessed 7 September 2015).Google Scholar
Naday, Alexandra, Freilich, Joshua D. & Mellow, Jeff (2008) “The Elusive Data on Supermax Confinement,” 88 The Prison J. 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Joshua (2011) The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officer's Union in California. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Michelle (2011) “Rehabilitation in the Punitive Era: The Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality in U.S. Prison Programs,” 45 Law & Society Rev. 33–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierson, Paul (2002) “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” 94.2 The American Political Science Rev. 251–67.Google Scholar
Pranis, Kevin (2007) “Doing Borrowed Time: The High Cost of Backdoor Prison Finance,” in Herivel, Tara & Wright, Paul, eds., Prison Profiteers: Who Makes Money from Mass Incarceration. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet (2012a) “The Most Restrictive Alternative: A Litigation History of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons, 1960-2006,” 57 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 69–123.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet (2012b) “Parole, Snitch, or Die: California's Supermax Prisons and Prisoners, 1987-2007,” 14.5 Punishment & Society 530–63.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet (2014a) “The Pelican Bay Hunger Strike: Resistance within the Structural Constraints of a U.S. Supermax Prison,” 113.3 South Atlantic Q. 579–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Keramet (2014b) “Punitive Contrasts: United States vs. Denmark – A Socio-Legal Comparison of Two Prison Systems,” The Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Annual: Global Perspectives, Sullivan, Larry, ed., Vol. 6.1, New York: AMS Press, Inc. 139–76.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet (2015) “Supermax Administration and the Eighth Amendment: Discretion, Deference, and Double-Bunking, 1986-2010,” 5.1 University of California Irvine Law Rev. 89–152.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet & Koenig, Alexa (2015) Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration, and Solitary Confinement. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riveland, Chase (1999) Supermax Prisons: Overview and General Considerations. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections, January, Available at http://www.nicic.org/pubs/1999/014937.pdf (accessed 13 February 2012).Google Scholar
Ross, Jeffrey Ian (2013) The Globalization of Supermax Prisons. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nicholas, O'Malley, Pat & Valverde, Mariana (2006) “Governmentality,” 2 Annual Rev. of Law & Social Science 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Ashley (2015) “A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion,” 49 Law & Society Rev. 365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schept, Judah (2013) “‘A lockdown facility … with the feel of a small, private college’: Liberal politics, jail expansion, and the carceral habitus,” 17 Theoretical Criminology 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, Rueul (2007) “The Era of Deference: Courts, Expertise, and the Emergence of New Deal Administrative Law,” 106 Michigan Law Rev. 399–442.Google Scholar
Schinkel, Marguerite (2014) “Punishment as moral communication: The experiences of long-term prisoners,” 16 Punishment & Society 578–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlanger, Margo (2006) “Civil Rights Injunctions over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders,” 81 New York University Law Rev. 550–630.Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, Heather (2010) “Mass Incarceration and the Paradox of Prison Conditions Litigation,” 44 Law and Society Rev. 732–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1985/1922) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. George Schwab, Trans. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, Lori (2015) “Penal subjectivities: Developing a theoretical framework for penal consciousness,” 17 Punishment & Society 114–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, Sharon (2009) Supermax: Controlling Risk through Isolation. Portland: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (2014) Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan & Feeley, Malcolm M. (2003) “The Form and Limits of the New Penology,” in Punishment and Social Control, Blomberg, Thomas G., & Cohen, Stanley, eds., New York: Aldine D. Gruyter.Google Scholar
Small, Julie (2011) “Under Scrutiny, Pelican Bay Prison Officials Say They Target Only Gang Leaders,” 89.3 KPCC Southern California Public Radio, Aug. 23.Google Scholar
St. John, Paige (2013) “Prison hunger strike leaders are in solitary but not alone,” Los Angeles Times, Jul. 28, Available at: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ff-ashker-20130729,0,1059923.story?page=1 (accessed 1 August 2013).Google Scholar
Stryker, Robin (1996) “Beyond History vs. Theory: Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation,” 24 Sociological Methods and Research 304–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tartaglia, Mike (2014) “Private Prisons, Private Records,” 94 Boston U. Law Rev. 1689–744.Google Scholar
Thompson, Heather Ann (2010) “Why Mass Incarceration Matters: Rethinking Crisis, Decline, and Transformation in Postwar American History,” 97.3 The J. of American History 703–34.Google Scholar
UN News Centre (2011) “Solitary confinement should be banned in most cases, UN expert says,” Oct. 18, Available at: https://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=40097 (accessed 22 October 2013).Google Scholar
Violence at Folsom Prison: Causes, Possible Solutions, Hearing Held by the Joint Legislative Committee on Prison Construction and Operations, Jun. 19, 1985, transcript available in the California State Archives.Google Scholar
Vuolo, Mike & Kruttschnitt, Candace (2008) “Prisoners’ Adjustment, Correctional Officers, and Context: The Foreground and Background of Punishment in Late Modernity,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 307–36.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc (2006) The Place of the Prison in the New Government. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Waldo, Dwight (1948) The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Weatherly, Richard & Lipsky, Michael (1977) “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special-Education Reform,” 17 Harvard Educational Rev. 171–97.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Daniel M. (1990) “Deukmejian Defends Buildup of Prison System,” Los Angeles Times, Jun. 15: A-3.Google Scholar
West, Heather C. & Sabol, William J. (2008) Prisoners in 2007, NCJ 224280. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Available at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/p07.pdf (accessed 17 February 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. (1983) “Sentencing Reform in the States: Lessons from the 1970s,” in Tonry, Michael & Zimring, Franklin, eds., Reform and Punishment: Essays on Criminal Sentencing. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E., & Hawkins, Gordon E. (1991) The Scale of Imprisonment. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E., & Hawkins, Gordon E. (1992) Prison Population and Criminal Justice Policy in California. Berkeley: Institute of Government Studies Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E., Hawkins, Gordon, & Kamin, Sam (2001) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Cases

Ashker v. Brown, Case No. 09-5796 CW (N.D. Cal. 2013). Order Denying Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 160, filed April 9. Document on file with author.Google Scholar
Ashker v. Brown, Case No. 09-5796 CW (N.D. Cal. 2013). Settlement Agreement filed Sept. 1, 2015. Document on file with author.Google Scholar
Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995).Google Scholar
Toussaint v. McCarthy, 597 F. Supp. 1388 (N.D. Cal. 1984), aff'd 801 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1986).Google Scholar

Legislation

Assembly Bill 277 (Stirling, California). As amended Aug. 25 (1986) (enacted).Google Scholar
Senate Bill 253 (Presley, California). Read Sept. 13. Microfilm text. (1985).Google Scholar
Senate Bill 1685 (Keene, California). Read Jun. 20. Microfilm text. (1988).Google Scholar
Senate Bill 1222 (Keene, California). Leg. Gen. Sess. (1986) (enacted).Google Scholar