Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-09T12:46:00.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sentence Bargaining of Upperworld and Underworld Crime in Ten Federal District Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1979

John Hagan  and
Ilene Nagel Bernstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the use of different types of sentence bargaining tactics in ten federal district courts. We distinguish between proactive and reactive prosecutorial orientation, and hypothesize that proactive prosecution of upperworld crime is associated with more explicit sentence bargaining than is the reactive prosecution of underworld crime. We present evidence for and explanations of this relationship.

Information

Type
Current Empirical Research
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Winter 1979 , pp. 467 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health. The article represents our own views and not necessarily those of NIMH. The findings reported in this paper are exploratory and will be pursued further in a monograph in preparation by the authors. A further discussion of the distinction between proactive and reactive prosecutor's offices can be found in Bernstein and Hagan (1978).

References

BERNSTEIN, Ilene and John, HAGAN (1978) “Process and Outcome in the Study of Social Problems: Multiple Methods and Theoretical Transformations.” Presented at the Second National Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Minneapolis (May 18-20).Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, Ilene, Edward, KICK, Jan, LEUNG and Barbara, SCHULZ (1977) “Charge Reduction: An Intermediary Stage in the Process of Labelling Criminal Defendants,” 56 Social Forces 362.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1973) “The Mobilization of Law,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 125.Google Scholar
BLUMBERG, Abraham (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John (1975) “Parameters of Criminal Prosecution: An Application of Path Analysis to a Problem of Criminal Justice,” 65 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 536.Google Scholar
KLEIN, John (1976) Let's Make a Deal. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
REISS, Albert J. (1971) The Police and the Public. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome (1966) Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
SUDNOW, David (1965) “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender's Office,” 12 Social Problems 255.Google Scholar