Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T13:35:27.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Taxpaying Behavior: A Conceptual Framework with Implications for Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Kent W. Smith  and
Karyl A. Kinsey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taxpaying is a primary nexus between individual and state, and tax laws are exemplar of purposive administrative law. Our framework for research on taxpaying emphasizes that compliance is as problematic as noncompliance, that individuals have different opportunities for both compliance and noncompliance, and that taxpaying does not necessarily involve deliberate decisions. Both the process of decision making and the content of decisions must be studied. Four clusters of factors affecting the content of compliance decisions are material consequences, normative expectations, sociolegal attitudes and beliefs, and expressive factors. How individuals subjectively “frame” the factors depends upon their social situations. The framework has several implications for research on tax noncompliance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , 1987 , pp. 639 - 663
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This paper is part of the research program of the American Bar Foundation's Taxpayer Compliance Project. The project is funded through contributions of tax practitioners, law firms, corporations, foundations, and associations, including major grants by the American Bar Association's Section of Taxation; the Gibbs Brothers, Starr, and Joyce Foundations; and General Motors. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. The analyses, conclusions, and opinions expressed are those of the authors and not of the American Bar Foundation, its officers, or directors.

References

ABELSON, R. P. (1981) “Psychological Status of the Script Concept,” 36 American Psychologist 715.Google Scholar
ABELSON, R. P., et al. (1982) “Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception,” 42 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 619.Google Scholar
AJZEN, leek, and Morris, FISHBEIN (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
BALES, John (1984) “Behavioral Studies Alter Economic Theory,” 15 American Psychological Association Monitor 3.Google Scholar
BARDACH, Eugene, and Robert A., KAGAN (1982) Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
BEACH, Lee Ray (1982) “Decision Making: Diagnosis, Action, Selection and Implementation,” in McAlister, L. (ed.), Research in Marketing, Supp. 1, Choice Models for Buyer Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
BRADBURN, Norman (1969) The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
CAMIC, Charles (1986) “The Matter of Habit,” 91 American Journal of Sociology 1039.Google Scholar
CLOTFELTER, Charles T. (1983) “Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns,” 65 Review of Economics and Statistics 363.Google Scholar
COX, Dennis (1984) “Raising Revenue in the Underground Economy,” 37 National Tax Journal 283.Google Scholar
DAVIDSON, A. R., and Diane M., MORRISON (1982) “Social Psychological Models of Decision Making,” in McAlister, L. (ed.), Research in Marketing, Supp. 1, Choice Models for Buyer Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
EINHORN, H., and Robin M., HOGARTH (1981) “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice,” 32 Annual Review of Psychology 53.Google Scholar
EKSTRAND, Laurie E. (1980) “Factors Affecting Compliance: Focus Group and Survey Results,” in Bowers, S. J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Conference on Taxation. Columbus: National Tax Association—Tax Institute of America.Google Scholar
FRATANDUONO, Richard J. (1986) “Trends in Voluntary Compliance of Taxpayers Filing Individual Tax Returns,” in IRS Research Division (ed.), Trend Analyses and Related Statistics: 1986 Update (Document 6011). Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
GREEN, Donald E. (1986) “Measures of Illegal Behavior in Individual-Level Deterrence Research.” Presented at the Midwest Sociological Society Meetings, Des Moines, March 27.Google Scholar
GROSS, Elizabeth L. (1986) “Individual Income Tax Returns for 1985: Selected Characteristics for the Taxpayer Usage Study,” 6 Statistics of Income Bulletin 1.Google Scholar
HERZBERG, Frederick (1968) “One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?” 46 Harvard Business Review 53.Google Scholar
HERZBERG, Frederick (1966) Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Publishing.Google Scholar
IRS: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1986) “Selected Statistical Series, 1970–1986,” 6 Statistics of Income Bulletin 95.Google Scholar
IRS: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE RESEARCH DIVISION (1983) Income Tax Compliance Research: Estimates for 1973–1981. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
JACKSON, Betty R., and Valerie C., MILLIRON (1986) “Tax Compliance Research: Problems and Prospects,” 5 Journal of Accounting Literature 125.Google Scholar
JANIS, Irving L., and Leon, MANN (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A. (1986) “On the Visibility of Income Tax Law Violations.” Presented at the Symposium on Taxpayer Compliance Research sponsored by the Panel on Taxpayer Compliance Research, National Academy of Sciences, South Padre Island, TX (January 15).Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A., and John T., SCHOLZ (1984) “The ‘Criminology’ of the Corporation and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies,” in Hawkins, K. and Thomas, J. M. (eds.), Enforcing Regulation. Hingham, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
KAHNEMAN, Daniel, and Amos, TVERSKY (1984) “Choices, Values, and Frames,” 39 American Psychologist 341.Google Scholar
Amos, TVERSKY (1979) “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” 47 Econometrica 263.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert, and McEWEN, Craig (1986) “Tax-Paying Behavior in Social Context: A Tentative Typology of Tax Compliance and Noncompliance.” Presented at the Symposium on Taxpayer Compliance Research sponsored by the Panel on Taxpayer Compliance Research, the National Academy of Sciences, South Padre Island, TX (January 16).Google Scholar
KINSEY, Karyl A. (1986) “Theories and Models of Tax Cheating,” 18 Criminal Justice Abstracts 403.Google Scholar
KINSEY, Karyl A. (1984) “Survey Studies of Tax Noncompliance: A Compendium and Review.” Working Paper 84-1, Tax Compliance Project, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.Google Scholar
KINSEY, Karyl A., and Kent W., SMITH (1987) “Income Tax Cheating: Opportunities and Preferences.” Working Paper 87-1, Tax Compliance Project, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.Google Scholar
KLEPPER, Steven, and Daniel, NAGIN (1986) “The Criminal Deterrence Literature: Implications for Research on Taxpayer Compliance.” Presented at the Symposium on Taxpayer Compliance Research sponsored by the Panel on Taxpayer Compliance Research, National Academy of Sciences, South Padre Island, TX (January 15).Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard (1982) “Organizing for Deterrence: Lessons from a Study of Child Support,” 16 Law & Society Review 513.Google Scholar
LEWIN, Kurt (1938) The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEWIS, Alan (1982) The Psychology of Taxation. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
LOFTUS, Elizabeth F. (1985) “To File, Perchance to Cheat,” 19(4) Psychology Today 34.Google Scholar
LONG, Susan B., and Judyth A., SWINGEN (1986) “An Examination of Income Tax Reporting Errors for Middle-Income Wage Earners.” Unpublished. Center for Tax Studies, School of Management, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
MASON, Robert (in press) “A Communication Model of Taxpayer Honesty,” Law and Policy.Google Scholar
MASON, Robert, and Lyle D., CALVIN (1984) “Public Confidence and Admitted Tax Evasion,” 37 National Tax Journal 489.Google Scholar
Lyle D., CALVIN (1978) “A Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion,” 13 Law & Society Review 73.Google Scholar
MILLIRON, Valerie C. (1984) “Taxpayer Perceptions of Complexity and the Effect of Complexity on Reporting Positions.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Business Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
MINOR, W. William (1978) “Deterrence Research: Problems of Theory and Method,” in Cramer, J. A. (ed.), Preventing Crime. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
NONET, Philippe, and Philip, SELZNICK (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Towards Responsive Law. New York: Octagon.Google Scholar
PAYNE, John W. (1982) “Contingent Decision Behavior,” 92 Psychological Bulletin 382.Google Scholar
SCHOLZ, John T. (1985a) “Coping with Complexity: A Bounded Rationality Perspective on Taxpayer Compliance,” in Bowers, S. J. and Staton, J. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the 78th Annual Conference on Taxation. Columbus: National Tax Association—Tax Institute of America.Google Scholar
Staton, J. L. (1985b) “Deterrence, Duty and Diligence: Notes Toward a More Adequate Theory of Compliance.” Presented as a discussion paper for the Roundtable on Deterrence, Duty and Diligence, Law & Society Meetings, San Diego (June 8).Google Scholar
Staton, J. L. (1984) “Cooperation, Deterrence, and the Ecology of Regulatory Enforcement,” 18 Law & Society Review 179.Google Scholar
SHIMP, Terence A., and Alican, KAVAS (1984) “The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage,” 11 Journal of Consumer Research 795.Google Scholar
SIMON, Herbert A. (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
SIMON, Herbert A., and James G., MARCH (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
SLEMROD, Joel, and Nikki, SORUM (1984). “The Compliance Cost of the U.S. Individual Income Tax System,” 37 National Tax Journal 461.Google Scholar
SLOVIC, P., B., FISCHHOFF, and Sarah, LICHTENSTEIN (1982) “Response Mode, Framing, and Information Processing Effects in Risk Assessment,” in Hogarth, R. (ed.), New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: The Framing of Questions and the Consistency of Response. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
SPICER, Michael W. (1974) “A Behavioral Model of Income Tax Evasion.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Division of Public Administration, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
SPICER, Michael W., and Lee A., BECKER (1980) “Fiscal Inequity and Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach,” 33 National Tax Journal 171.Google Scholar
SPICER, Michael W., and S. B., LUNDSTEDT (1976) “Understanding Tax Evasion,” 31 Public Finance 295.Google Scholar
THALER, R. (1980) “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” 1 Journal of Economic and Behavioral Organizations 39.Google Scholar
THIBAUT, John W., and Harold H., KELLEY (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
THURMAN, Quint C., JOHN, Craig ST., and Lisa, RIGGS (1984) “Neutralization and Tax Evasion: How Effective Would a Moral Appeal Be in Improving Compliance to Tax Laws?” 6 Law and Policy 309.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles R. (1980) Sanctions and Social Deviance: The Question of Deterrence. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
TRIANDIS, H. C. (1977) Interpersonal Behavior. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
TVERSKY, Amos, and Daniel, KAHNEMAN (1981) “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” 211 Science 453.Google Scholar
VOGEL, Joachim (1974) “Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Survey Data,” 27 National Tax Journal 499.Google Scholar
WEBLEY, Paul, and Steve, HALSTED (1985) “Tax Evasion on the Micro: Significant Simulations or Expedient Experiments?” 1 Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 87.Google Scholar
WESTAT, INC. (1980) Self-Reported Tax Compliance: A Pilot Survey Report. [Prepared for and available from the Internal Revenue Service.] Rockville MD: Westat Inc.Google Scholar
WITTE, Ann D., and Diane F., WOODBURY (1985) “The Effect of Tax Laws and Tax Administration on Tax Compliance: The Case of the U.S. Individual Income Tax,” 38 National Tax Journal 1.Google Scholar
Diane F., WOODBURY (1983) “What We Know about the Factors Affecting Compliance with the Tax Laws,” in Sawicki, P. (ed.), Income Tax Compliance: A Report of the ABA Section of Taxation Invitational Conference on Income Tax Compliance. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
YANKELOVICH, SKELLY AND WHITE, INC. (1984) Taxpayer Attitudes Study: Final Report. [Prepared for and available from the Internal Revenue Service.] New York: Yankelovich, Skelly and White, Inc.Google Scholar