Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-vw7zd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-13T18:21:49.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Marc Galanter*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law and Jurisprudence State University of New York at Buffalo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This essay attempts to discern some of the general features of a legal system like the American by drawing on (and rearranging) commonplaces and less than systematic gleanings from the literature. The speculative and tentative nature of the assertions here will be apparent and is acknowledged here wholesale to spare myself and the reader repeated disclaimers.

I would like to try to put forward some conjectures about the way in which the basic architecture of the legal system creates and limits the possibilities of using the system ;as a means of redistributive (that is, systemically equalizing) change. Our question, specifically, is, under what conditions can Iitigation be redistributive, taking litigation in the broadest sense of the presentation of claims to be decided by courts (or court-like agencies) and the whole penumbra of threats, feints, and so forth, surrounding such presentation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 The Law and Society Association