Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:59:09.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To classify or not to classify, that is the question?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Caroline Mosley  and
Lee Crowder
Lee Crowder
Affiliation:
Solicitors, Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I recently found myself in the ‘enviable’ position of purchasing a library management system. The whole process gave me the chance to review the current classification scheme. The classification used was a ‘home made’ scheme based on broad legal topics. While the scheme was in itself fine, developments in the law meant that a significant number of areas were no longer sufficient. Coupled with the rapid growth in the firm's specialisms in the past few years, the classification scheme no longer served the needs of the library.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Information Management , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 8 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © The British and Irish Association of Law Librarians 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Jones, Simon “Classification: are we overdoing it?” Update 1(1) 04 2002 p. 24.Google Scholar
2Hunter, Eric “Classification: are underdoing it?” Update 1 (2) 05 2002 p. 33. A. Steven Pollitt “Still the name of the game.” Update 1 (2) May 2002 p. 33.Google Scholar
3Moys, Elizabeth M.. “Moys classification and thesaurus for legal materials.” 4th ed. Bowker-Saur, 2001.Google Scholar