34. See eg Carter and Harland, above n 7, pp 78–84, and S N Ball ‘Work Camed out in Pursuance of Letters of Intent - Contract or Restitution?’ (1983) 99 LQR 572, 584, who has described this as the ‘realistic ability to construct a reasonable contract from the bare bones of agreement’. Carter and Furmston, above n 13, p 12, consider that a ‘generous approach of the courts [to implying terms] is essential today’. Note, however, the unwillingness of the House of Lords in Walford v Miles [1992] 2 AC128, to ‘fill in’ the incomplete ‘lockout’ agreement in that case, and instead to treat it as uncertain; for criticisms, see eg Paterson, above n 21, and R P Buckley ‘Walford v Miles: False Certainty About Uncertainty - An Australian Perspective’ (1993) 6 JCL 58. We are concerned here with contracts other than for the sale of goods, in relation to which a term as to reasonable price, in the absence of agreement, is implied by various Sale of Goods legislation.