Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority


This contribution presents international judicial institutions as multifunctional actors against the background of a traditional understanding, which sees just one function: settling disputes. The traditional, one-dimensional understanding eclipses other important functions that many international courts do actually perform in contexts of global governance and it underrates problems in their legitimation. In order to appreciate international adjudications’ manifold contributions to social interaction, the paper first identifies three more functions beyond dispute settlement: the stabilization of normative expectations, law-making, and the control as well as legitimation of authority exercised by others. It then places these functions within broader basic understandings of international courts, which respectively picture them as instruments of the parties in a state-centred world order, as organs of a value-based international community, and as institutions of specific legal regimes. The distinct problems that each of these basic understanding faces lead to the contours of a new paradigm for the study of international courts as actors exercising public authority. The present functional analysis ultimately helps to refine both the phenomenon and normative questions.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Y. Shany , ‘No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary’, (2009) 20 EJIL 73

K. Alter , ‘The Evolving International Judiciary’, (2011) 7 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 387

A. von Bogdandy and I. Venzke , ‘In Whose Name? International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification’, (2012) 23 EJIL 7

L. Helfer and A.-M. Slaughter , ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, (1997) 107 Yale Law Journal 273

J. Alvarez , International Organizations as Law-Makers (2006)

A. Stone Sweet , ‘Judicialization and the Construction of Governance’, (1999) 32 Comparative Political Studies 147.

J. Alvarez , ‘Rush to Closure: Lessons of the Tadić Judgment’, (1998) 96 Michigan Law Review 2061

E. Benvenisti and G. W. Downs , ‘National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law’, (2009) 20 EJIL 59

A.T. Guzman , How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (2008), 71

A. Höland , ‘Wie wirkt Rechtsprechung?’, (2009) 30 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 23

I. Venzke , How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (2012).

R. M. Cover , ‘Violence and the Word’, (1986) 95 Yale Law Journal 1601.

F. Schauer , ‘Precedent’, (1987) 39 Stanford Law Review 571

C. J. Carrubba , ‘Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes’, (2005) 67 Journal of Politics 669

H. Keller and A. Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (2008)

J. Saurer , ‘Die Globalisierung des Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatzes’, (2012) 51 Der Staat 3

S. Issacharoff , ‘Democracy and Collective Decision Making’, (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 231.

D. W. Bowett , ‘The Court's Role in Relation to International Organizations’, in V. Lowe and M. Fitzmaurice (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (1996), 181

L. F. Damrosch , ‘Retaliation or Arbitration – Or Both? The 1978 United States–France Aviation Dispute’, (1980) 74 AJIL 785

D. D. Caron , ‘War and International Adjudication: Reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference’, (2000) 94 AJIL 4

E. Valencia-Ospina , ‘Non-Governmental Organizations and the International Court of Justice’, in T. Treves et al. (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (2005), 227.

R. Howse , ‘Membership and Its Privileges: The WTO, Civil Society, and the Amicus Brief Controversy’, (2003) 9 European Law Journal 496

D. M. McRae , ‘What Is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?’, (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law 2.

T. L. Stein , ‘Jurisprudence and Jurists’ Prudence: The Iranian-Forum Clause Decisions of the Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal’, (1984) 78 AJIL 1

G. H. Aldrich , The Jurisprudence of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal (1996)

M. Payandeh , Internationales Gemeinschaftsrecht (2010), 131

A. A. Cançado Trindade , International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (2010).

E. Bates , The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights (2010).

T. Kleinlein , ‘Between Myths and Norms: Constructivist Constitutionalism and the Potential of Constitutional Principles in International Law’, (2012) 81 Nordic Journal of International Law 79

R. Howse , ‘From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime’, (2002) 96 AJIL 94

R. B. Stewart and M. R. Sanchez-Badin , ‘The World Trade Organization and Global Administrative Law’, in C. Joerges and E. U. Petersmann , Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law (2011)

C. Schreuer , ‘From ICSID Annulment to Appeal: Half Way Down the Slippery Slope’, (2011) 10 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 211

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Leiden Journal of International Law
  • ISSN: 0922-1565
  • EISSN: 1478-9698
  • URL: /core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 252 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 484 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.