1 Essays by M. Milanovic, H. Ruiz Fabri, P. M. Dupuy et al., (2012) 23 EJIL, at 1029–173; See Casini, L., (2012) 10Journal of International Criminal Justice1452.
2Ibid., See Casini for a summary of the contributions.
3Ben-Naftali, O., ‘Sentiment, Sense, and Sensibility in the Genesis of Utopian Traditions’, (2012) 23EJIL1133, at 1133.
4 The creative role of publicists in teaching international law is explicitly recognized in Art. 38(1)(d) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
5 I argue here that, while lawyers have the expertise to contribute to international law reforms, they do not necessarily have the sole expertise.
6 R. Marius, Thomas More: A Biography (1999), 153–4.
7Marin, L., ‘Thesis on Ideology and Utopia’, (1976) 6Minnesota Review71, at 71.
8Jameson, F., ‘The Politics of Utopia’, (2004) 25New Left Review35; K. Kumar, Utopianism (1991).
9 I tried to make this point concerning proposals for an international legal protection of climate-induced migration. The question was why these migrants in particular should be protected. The legal debate, in this area, is at odds with empirical evidence, for instance on the impossibility of identifying individual ‘climate migrants’; See Mayer, B., ‘Fraternity, Responsibility, and Sustainability: The International Legal Protection of Climate (or Environmental) Migrants at the Crossroads’, (2012) 56Supreme Court Law Review [Canada] 723; Mayer, B. ‘Climate Change and International Law in the Grim Days’, (2013) 24EJIL947, at 962–4.
10Feichtner, I., ‘Realizing Utopia through the Practice of International Law’, (2012) 23EJIL1143, at 1155.
11Milanovic, M., ‘On Realistic Utopias and Other Oxymorons: An Essay on Antonio Cassese's Last Book’, (2012) 23EJIL1033, at 1038.
12 On the mainstream idea that ‘more international law is always better’, see Chimni, B. S., ‘An Outline of a Marxist Course on Public International Law’, (2004) 17LJIL1, at 2
13 David Hume argued that claims about what ought to be cannot be deduced solely from claims about what is. International lawyers are experts in what is, but this may only be of little help when arguing about what ought to be.
14 M. Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (2005), at 513.
17 See Fabri, H. Ruiz, ‘Enhancing the Rhetoric of Jus Cogens’, (2012) 23EJIL1047, at 1053. Fabri notes ‘Cassese's act of faith lying in his belief that law can bring about change in the world’; See supranote 12 for the outline of a critical perspective on international law's liberalism.
19 See, e.g., Schachter, O., ‘Invisible College of International Lawyers’, (1977) 72Northwestern University Law Review217; Orford, A. (ed.) International Law and its Others (2006); Singh, P. and Mayer, B. (eds.) Critical International Law: Post-Realism, Post-Colonialism and Transnationalism (forthcoming).
20 See, e.g., R. Granfield, Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond (1992); P. C. Kissam, The Discipline of Law Schools: The Making of Modern Lawyers (2003).
21 See, e.g., Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C. and Wright, S., ‘Feminist Approaches to International Law’, (1991) 85AJIL613.
22 See, e.g., Symposium: Critical Race Theory and International Law, (2000) 45 Vill. L. Rev. 827 (contributions by R. Gordon, M. Mutua, P. E. Andrews et al.); Muthua, A. D., ‘The Rise, Development, and Future Directions of Critical Race Theory and Related Scholarship’, (2006) 84Denver University Law Review329.
23 See for instance Chimni, B. S., ‘Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto’, (2006) 8International Community Law Review3; A. Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (2007); Kennedy, D., ‘Spring Break’, (1984) 63Texas Law Review1377.
35 See, e.g., Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K., ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, (1998) 52International Organization887; I. Johnstone, The Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics, and Organizations (2011); Crawford, N. C., ‘Homo Politicus and Argument (Nearly) All the Way Down: Persuasion in Politics’, (2009) 7Perspectives on Politics103, at 109. See also, more generally, Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (2013).
36 See Bodansky, D., ‘Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations’ for a discussion on the legitimacy of scholars to argue for political change in Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M.A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (2013) 321, at 325.
37 See K. W. Abbott and D. Snidal, ‘Law, Legalization, and Politics’, ibid., 33, at 40.
* PhD candidate, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law; LLM (McGill); MA Pol. Sci. (Sciences Po) [firstname.lastname@example.org]. I would like to thank LJIL's two anonymous peer-reviewers for insightful comments. All mistakes remain mine.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.