Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-8mwbx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-15T13:36:25.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AUTOMATION, STAGNATION, AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF A ROBOT TAX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Emanuel Gasteiger*
Affiliation:
TU Wien and Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)
Klaus Prettner
Affiliation:
University of Hohenheim
*
Address correspondence to: Emanuel Gasteiger, TU Wien, Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10, 1040 Wien, Austria. e-mail: emanuel.gasteiger@tuwien.ac.at. Phone: (+43) 15880110533.

Abstract

We assess the long-run growth effects of automation in the overlapping generations framework. Although automation implies constant returns to capital and, thus, an AK production side of the economy, positive long-run growth does not emerge. The reason is that automation suppresses wage income, which is the only source of investment in the overlapping generations model. Our result stands in sharp contrast to the representative agent setting with automation, where sustained long-run growth is possible even without technological progress. Our analysis therefore provides a cautionary tale that the underlying modeling structure of saving/investment decisions matters for the derived economic impact of automation. In addition, we show that a robot tax has the potential to raise per capita output and welfare at the steady state. However, it cannot induce a takeoff toward positive long-run growth.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable