Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-66d7dfc8f5-tfp9r Total loading time: 0.378 Render date: 2023-02-08T06:54:28.839Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

CONSUMERS’ UPDATING, POLICY SHOCKS, AND PUBLIC DEBT: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF STATE DEPENDENCIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2021

Martin Geiger*
Affiliation:
Liechtenstein Institute and University of Innsbruck
Marios Zachariadis
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus
*
Address correspondence to: Martin Geiger, Liechtenstein Institute, St. Luziweg 2, 9487 Bendern, Liechtenstein. e-mail: martin.geiger@liechtenstein-institut.li. Phone: +423 375 88 49.

Abstract

We assess the impact of fiscal and monetary policy shocks on US survey-based consumer expectations within states of low and high public debt. Following an unexpected increase in government spending, consumption intentions rise in the low-debt state and fall in the high-debt state. Overall, such a shock has adverse effects on expectations in high-debt states. Similarly, contractionary monetary policy shocks induce pessimistic expectations in the high-debt state but not in the low-debt state. The estimated responses suggest that higher public debt fuels considerations regarding its repayment, giving rise to state dependencies in the updating of expectations in response to both fiscal and monetary policy shocks.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was originally titled “Assessing Expectations as a Joint Monetary-Fiscal and State-Dependent Phenomenon”. The authors are grateful to Nicoletta Pashourtidou and Johann Scharler for comments and suggestions. The authors have no competing interests to declare. This work was supported by the Austrian National Bank [grant number 18142].

References

Alpanda, S. and Zubairy, S. (2019) Household debt overhang and transmission of monetary policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 51(5), 12651307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, P. and Le Bihan, H. (2013) Inattentive professional forecasters. Journal of Monetary Economics 60(8), 967982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012) Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4(2), 127.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2013) Fiscal multipliers in recession and expansion. In: Alesina, A. and Giavazzi, F. (eds.), Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis, pp. 6398. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachmann, R., Berg, T. O. and Sims, E. R. (2015) Inflation expectations and readiness to spend: Cross-sectional evidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7(1), 135.Google Scholar
Bernardini, M. and Peersman, G. (2018) Private debt overhang and the government spending multiplier: Evidence for the United States. Journal of Applied Econometrics 33(4), 485508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertola, G. and Drazen, A. (1993) Trigger points and budget cuts: Explaining the effects of fiscal austerity. American Economic Review 83(1), 1126.Google Scholar
Bianchi, F. and Ilut, C. (2017) Monetary/fiscal policy mix and agents’ beliefs. Review of Economic Dynamics 26, 113139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. (1990) Comment. In: Blanchard, O. and Fischer, S. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, pp. 111116. Cambridge and MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R. (2002) An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4), 13291368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, B., Müller, G. J. and Pfeifer, J. (2020) Does austerity pay off? Review of Economics and Statistics 102(2), 323338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenlechner, M. and Scharler, J. (2020) Private sector debt, financial constraints, and the effects of monetary policy: Evidence from the us. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 82(4), 889915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, C. and Nechio, F. (2014) Do people understand monetary policy? Journal of Monetary Economics 66, 108123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coibion, O. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012) What can survey forecasts tell us about information rigidities? Journal of Political Economy 120(1), 116159.Google Scholar
Coibion, O. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2015a) Information rigidity and the expectations formation process: A simple framework and new facts. American Economic Review 105(8), 26442678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coibion, O. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2015b) Is the Phillips curve alive and well after all? inflation expectations and the missing disinflation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7(1), 197232.Google Scholar
Corsetti, G., Meier, A. and Müller, G. J. (2012) What determines government spending multipliers? Economic Policy 27(72), 521565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dräger, L., Lamla, M. J. and Pfajfar, D. (2016) Are survey expectations theory-consistent? The role of central bank communication and news. European Economic Review 85, 84111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. and Krugman, P. (2012) Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(3), 14691513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. and Woodford, M. (2003) The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 34(1), 139235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eusepi, S. and Preston, B. (2018) Fiscal foundations of inflation: Imperfect knowledge. American Economic Review 108(9), 25512589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, M., Luhan, W. J. and Scharler, J. (2016) When do fiscal consolidations lead to consumption booms? lessons from a laboratory experiment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 69, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, M. and Zachariadis, M. (2021) Consumers’ updating, policy shocks and public debt: An empirical assessment of state dependencies. Working Papers Liechtenstein Institute No. 69.Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. and Teräsvirta, T. (1993) Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships . Advanced Texts in Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G. and Végh, C. A. (2013) How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics 60(2), 239254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordà, Ò. (2005) Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review 95(1), 161182.Google Scholar
Jordà, Ò., Schularick, M. and Taylor, A. M. (2013) When credit bites back. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippner, L. (2015) Zero Lower Bound Term Structure Modeling: A Practitioner’s Guide . Applied Quantitative Finance Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1998) It’s Baaack: Japan’s slump and the return of the liquidity trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 29(2), 137206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamla, M. and Vinogradov, D. (2019) Central bank announcements: Big news for little people? Journal of Monetary Economics 108, 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, E. M. (1991) Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ monetary and fiscal policies. Journal of Monetary Economics 27(1), 129147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, E. M. and Leith, C. (2016) Understanding inflation as a joint Monetary–Fiscal phenomenon. In: Taylor, J. B. and Uhlig, H. (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, pp. 2305–2415. Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mackowiak, B. and Wiederholt, M. (2009) Optimal sticky prices under rational inattention. American Economic Review 99(3), 769803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N. G. and Reis, R. (2002) Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the new keynesian phillips curve. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4), 12951328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N. G. and Reis, R. (2010) Imperfect information and aggregate supply. In: Friedman, B. M. and Woodford, M. (eds.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 183229. San Diego and Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Perotti, R. (1999) Fiscal policy in good times and bad. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4), 13991436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, V. A. (2011) Identifying government spending shocks: It’s all in the timing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(1), 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, V. A. and Zubairy, S. (2018) Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: Evidence from US historical data. Journal of Political Economy 126(2), 850901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (2004) A new measure of monetary shocks: Derivation and implications. American Economic Review 94(4), 10551084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. (2003) Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics 50(3), 665690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. (2010) Rational inattention and monetary economics. In: Friedman, B. M. and Woodford, M. (eds.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 155181. San Diego and Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sims, C. A. (2011) Stepping on a rake: The role of fiscal policy in the inflation of the 1970s. European Economic Review 55(1), 4856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, A. (1997) Fiscal crises and aggregate demand: Can high public debt reverse the effects of fiscal policy? Journal of Public Economics 65(2), 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenreyro, S. and Thwaites, G. (2016) Pushing on a string: US monetary policy is less powerful in recessions. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 8(4), 4374.Google Scholar
Wong, B. (2015) Do inflation expectations propagate the inflationary impact of real oil price shocks? Evidence from the Michigan survey. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 47(8), 16731689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. C. and Xia, F. D. (2016) Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 48(2–3), 253291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yellen, L. J. (2016) Macroeconomic research after the crisis. In: 60th Annual Economic Conference Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, October 14th Speech. Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Geiger and Zachariadis supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Geiger and Zachariadis supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 743 KB
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

CONSUMERS’ UPDATING, POLICY SHOCKS, AND PUBLIC DEBT: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF STATE DEPENDENCIES
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

CONSUMERS’ UPDATING, POLICY SHOCKS, AND PUBLIC DEBT: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF STATE DEPENDENCIES
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

CONSUMERS’ UPDATING, POLICY SHOCKS, AND PUBLIC DEBT: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF STATE DEPENDENCIES
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *