Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-plp5r Total loading time: 4.453 Render date: 2021-04-14T06:38:21.476Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

DO HETEROGENEOUS EXPECTATIONS CONSTITUTE A CHALLENGE FOR POLICY INTERACTION?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

Emanuel Gasteiger
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin and Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
Corresponding

Abstract

Yes, indeed; at least for macroeconomic policy interaction. We examine a Neo-Classical economy and provide the conditions for policy arrangements to successfully stabilize the economy when agents have either rational or adaptive expectations. For a contemporaneous-data monetary policy rule, the monetarist solution is unique and stationary under a passive fiscal/active monetary policy regime if monetary policy appropriately incorporates expectational heterogeneity. In contrast, the active fiscal/passive monetary policy regime's fiscalist solution is prone to explosiveness due to empirically plausible expectational heterogeneity. Nevertheless, this can be a well-defined, rather orthodox equilibrium. For operational monetary policy rules, only the results for the fiscalist solution prevail. Moreover, our results are plausible from an adaptive learning viewpoint.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

We are indebted to the associate editor, two anonymous referees, Seppo Honkapohja and the participants of the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Austrian Economic Association, the 13th International Meeting of the Association for Public Economic Theory, the 7th Meeting of the Portuguese Economic Journal, the 28th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association/67th European Meeting of the Econometric Society, and the Workshop on Macroeconomic Policy and Expectations at the University of St Andrews for many helpful comments. We thank the Economic Institute of the Narodowy Bank Polski for outstanding hospitality during the time as visiting researcher while working on this project. Financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PEst-OE/EGE/UI 0315/2011) is gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are the responsibility of the author.

References

Anufriev, Mikhail, Assenza, Tiziana, Hommes, Cars H., and Massaro, Domenico (2013) Interest rate rules and macroeconomic stability under heterogeneous expectations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 15741604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arifovic, Jasmina, Bullard, James, and Kostyshyna, Olena (2013) Social learning and monetary policy rules. Economic Journal 123, 3876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assenza, Tiziana, Heemeijer, Peter, Hommes, Cars H., and Massaro, Domenico (2013) Individual Expectations and Aggregate Macro Behavior. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 16.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Jess, Evans, George W., and Honkapohja, Seppo (2014) Liquidity traps and expectation dynamics: Fiscal stimulus or fiscal austerity? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 45, 220238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardi, Michele (2009) Monetary policy with heterogeneous and misspecified expectations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41, 79100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier Jean and Kahn, Charles M. (1980) The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica 48, 13051311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovi, Maurizio (2013) Are the representative agent's beliefs based on efficient econometric models? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 633648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A. (2004) The theory of rationally heterogeneous expectations: Evidence from survey data on inflation expectations. Economic Journal 114, 592621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A. (2007) Sticky information and model uncertainty in survey data on inflation expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 245276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A., Davig, Troy, and McGough, Bruce (2008) Monetary-fiscal policy interactions under implementable monetary policy rules. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40, 10951102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A. and Evans, George W. (2006) Intrinsic heterogeneity in expectation formation. Journal of Economic Theory 127, 264295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, William A. and Hommes, Cars H. (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65, 10591095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A. and McGough, Bruce (2004) Multiple equilibria in heterogeneous expectations models. Contributions to Macroeconomics 4, 116.Google Scholar
Branch, William A. and McGough, Bruce (2009) A New Keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33, 10361051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A. and McGough, Bruce (2010) Dynamic predictor selection in a New Keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 14921508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, William A. and McGough, Bruce (2011) Business cycle amplification with heterogeneous expectations. Economic Theory 47, 395421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, James B. and Mitra, Kaushik (2002) Learning about monetary policy rules. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 11051129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Christopher D. (2003) Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 269298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, John H. (2011) Determinacy and identification with Taylor rules. Journal of Political Economy 119, 565615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornea, Adriana, Hommes, Cars H., and Massaro, Domenico (2013) Behavioral Heterogeneity in U.S. Inflation Dynamics. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 15.Google Scholar
Davig, Troy and Leeper, Eric M. (2006) Fluctuating macro policies and the fiscal theory. In Acemoğlu, Daron, Rogoff, Kenneth S., and Woodford, Michael (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, vol. 21, pp. 247316. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davig, Troy and Leeper, Eric M. (2011) Monetary-fiscal policy interactions and fiscal stimulus. European Economic Review 55, 211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grauwe, Paul (2010) The scientific foundation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. Public Choice 144, 413443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eusepi, Stefano and Preston, Bruce (2012) Debt, policy uncertainty and expectations stabilization. Journal of the European Economic Association 10, 860886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, George W., Guse, Eran, and Honkapohja, Seppo (2008) Liquidity traps, learning and stagnation. European Economic Review 52, 14381463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, George W. and Honkapohja, Seppo (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, George W. and Honkapohja, Seppo (2005) Policy interaction, expectations and the liquidity trap. Review of Economic Dynamics 8, 303323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, George W. and Honkapohja, Seppo (2007) Policy interaction, learning, and the fiscal theory of prices. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 665690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, George W. and Honkapohja, Seppo (2013) Learning as a rational foundation for macroeconomics and finance. In Frydman, Roman and Phelps, Edmund S. (eds.), Rethinking Expectations: The Way Forward for Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gasteiger, Emanuel (2014) Heterogeneous expectations, optimal monetary policy, and the merit of policy inertia. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 46, 15351554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommes, Cars H. (2011) The heterogeneous expectations hypothesis: Some evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommes, Cars H. and Lustenhouwer, Joep (2015) Inflation Targeting and Liquidity Traps under Endogenous Credibility. CeNDEF working paper 15-03.Google Scholar
Honkapohja, Seppo and Mitra, Kaushik (2006) Learning stability in economies with heterogeneous agents. Review of Economic Dynamics 9, 284309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, Ronald S. (2004) Integers, Polynomials, and Rings: A Course in Algebra. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kirsanova, Tatiana, Leith, Campbell, and Wren-Lewis, Simon (2009) Monetary and fiscal policy interaction: The current consensus assignment in the light of recent developments. Economic Journal 119, F482F496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Paul (2000) Using the generalized Schur form to solve a multivariate linear rational expectations model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24, 14051423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, Mordecai, Piccillo, Giulia, and Wu, Howei (2013) Modeling diverse expectations in an aggregated New Keynesian model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 14031433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, Eric M. (1991) Equilibria under active and passive monetary and fiscal policies. Journal of Monetary Economics 27, 129147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, Eric M. and Zhou, Xuan (2013) Inflation's Role in Optimal Monetary-Fiscal Policy. NBER working paper 19686.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory, Ricardo Reis, and Wolfers, Justin (2003) Disagreement about inflation expectations. In Gertler, Mark and Rogoff, Kenneth S. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, vol. 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Massaro, Domenico (2013) Heterogeneous expectations in monetary DSGE models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 680692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. (1999) Issues in the design of monetary policy rules. In Taylor, John B. and Woodford, Michael (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics. Handbooks in Economics, vol. 1A, pp. 14831530. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. (2001) Indeterminacy, bubbles, and the fiscal theory of price level determination. Journal of Monetary Economics 47, 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. (2003) Multiple-solution indeterminacies in monetary policy analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 11531175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. and Nelson, Edward (2005) Monetary and fiscal theories of the price level: The irreconcilable differences. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 21, 565583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios and Williams, John C. (2005a) Imperfect knowledge, inflation expectations, and monetary policy. In Bernanke, Ben S. and Woodford, Michael (eds.), The Inflation-Targeting Debate. Studies in Business Cycles, vol. 32, pp. 201234. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios and Williams, John C. (2005b) Inflation scares and forecast-based monetary policy. Review of Economic Dynamics 8, 498527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios and Williams, John C. (2007a) Inflation targeting under imperfect knowledge. In Mishkin, Frederic S. and Schmidt-Hebbel, Klaus (eds.), Monetary Policy Under Inflation Targeting. Series on Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies, vol. XI, pp. 77123. Santiago, Chile: Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios and Williams, John C. (2007b) Robust monetary policy with imperfect knowledge. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 14061435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfajfar, Damjan and Žakelj, Blaž (2016) Inflation expectations and monetary policy design: Evidence from the laboratory. Macroeconomic Dynamics. doi:10.1017/S1365100516000560.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie and Uribe, Martín (2007) Optimal simple and implementable monetary and fiscal rules. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 17021725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Christopher A. (2013) Paper money. American Economic Review 103, 563584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John B. (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John B. (1999) A historical analysis of monetary policy rules. In Taylor, John B. (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules. Studies in Business Cycles, vol. 31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, Michael (2003) Comment on: “Multiple-solution indeterminacies in monetary policy analysis” by Bennett T. McCallum. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 11771188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, Michael (2013) Macroeconomic analysis without the rational expectations hypothesis. Annual Review of Economics 5, 303346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Mingjun (2007) Monetary policy under misspecified expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 12781299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 177 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th September 2017 - 14th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

DO HETEROGENEOUS EXPECTATIONS CONSTITUTE A CHALLENGE FOR POLICY INTERACTION?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

DO HETEROGENEOUS EXPECTATIONS CONSTITUTE A CHALLENGE FOR POLICY INTERACTION?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

DO HETEROGENEOUS EXPECTATIONS CONSTITUTE A CHALLENGE FOR POLICY INTERACTION?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *